Petra Martic and Ana Bogdan will play each other in the qualifications of the Rothesay International for the 5th time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 2:30 pm on Court 4. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Petra Martic who should win in 3 sets.
Petra Martic -> 1.48
Ana Bogdan -> 2.51
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Petra Martic vs. Ana Bogdan
This will be the 5th time that Petra Martic and Ana Bogdan fight against each other. The head to head is 4-0 for Martic (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on grass.
The last time that they squared off, Martic won 6-2 6-4 in the 2nd round in New York back in 2019.
Highlights Petra Martic vs Ana Bogdan – New York 29-August-2019
Petra Martic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 10-14 | 4-6 | 5-5 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-22 | 8-13 | 6-4 | 5-2 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 33-21 | 11-10 | 18-6 | 1-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 15-21 | 7-12 | 6-5 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 14-11 | 8-6 | 6-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 30, the Croatian reached the qualifications after defeating Rebecca Marino 6-4 3-6 7-5.
In the qualifications, Petra defeated Marino (6-4 3-6 7-5).During the match, Martic scored less points (5) than Marino. In fact, the world no. 30 won 91 points vs Marino’s. That means that Martic was more focused during the important points. Martic was exceptionally aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about the service games, Martic scored 11 aces and she committed only 7 double faults. Petra Martic lost the serve 5 times and she saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Martic put 58% of her first serves in, winning 64% (32/50) of the points behind her 1st serve and 47% (17/36) on the 2nd serve. Petra broke Marino 6 times after converting 38% of her break points (6/16).
Martic has good match record in the last 10 years having won 59% of her matches (244-168). 1-0 on grass in 2023. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this competition, Martic has an aggregate 22-19 record in the last years on grass.
Petra’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in Linz.
The Croatian has an aggregate 15-12 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Eastbourne
Ana Bogdan
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 11-15 | 2-6 | 5-7 | 4-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-21 | 5-9 | 17-7 | 2-2 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-17 | 4-3 | 20-8 | 11-4 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 20-19 | 7-7 | 7-6 | 6-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-8 | 4-3 | 2-2 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 61, Ana reached the qualifications after beating Panna Udvardy 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications, Bogdan had a good straight sets win against Udvardy (6-4 6-4). During the match Bogdan scored 73 points vs Udvardy’s 59. The Romanian was quite aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about serving, Bogdan blasted 3 aces and she committed only 3 double faults. Ana Bogdan lost the serve 3 times and she saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Bogdan put 52% of her first serves in, winning 74% (23/31) of the points behind her 1st serve and 45% (13/29) on the 2nd serve. The Romanian broke Udvardy 5 times after converting 33% of her break points (5/15).
The Romanian has an overall 12-13 win-loss record in 2023, 3-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Eastbourne
Ana has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Martic | Bogdan |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 31 | 20 |
| Pts | 91-96 | 73-59 |
| Total Points | 187 | 132 |
| Winners | 32 | 23 |
| %Winners | 35% | 32% |
Both Martic and Bogdan played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Petra Martic dropped 1 set while Ana Bogdan hasn’t lost a set so far. Martic has played 1 set more than Bogdan (3 vs 2). Therefore, Martic played 11 games more than Bogdan. The Croatian scored 32 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, Ana bagged 23 winners (32%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Martic | Bogdan |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 11 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 11 | 3 |
| 1st in | 50/86 | 31/60 |
| %1st in | 58% | 52% |
| 1st pts | 32/50 | 23/31 |
| %1st pts | 64% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 17/36 | 13/29 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 45% |
Martic managed to score 11 aces . Bogdan made 3 aces . Martic won 64% points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Bogdan won 74% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Martic | Bogdan |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 5 |
| Converted | 6/16 | 5/15 |
| % Converted | 38% | 33% |
| Conceded | 9 | 6 |
| Saved | 4 | 3 |
| % Saved | 44% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 3 |
Petra broke her opponent 6 times with a 38% conversion rate. Petra dropped her serve 5 times and she saved 44% of the break points that she conceded. Ana broke her opponent 5 times with a 33% conversion rate. Bogdan conceded her serve 3 times and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded.
| Martic | |||
| Q1 Marino | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 3-6 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 91-96 | 91-96 | |
| Total points | 187 | 187 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 11 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 50/86 | 50/86 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 32/50 | 32/50 | |
| % 1st pts | 64% | 64% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/36 | 17/36 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/16 | 6/16 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 4/9 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 44% | 44% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
| Bogdan | |||
| Q1 Udvardy | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 73-59 | 73-59 | |
| Total points | 132 | 132 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 31/60 | 31/60 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 23/31 | 23/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/29 | 13/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/15 | 5/15 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 3/6 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Tennis Scores in Eastbourne
- Daniele SpinnatoSpinnato – Lewie ParkerParker (6-1 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Petra MarticMartic – Ana BogdanBogdan (4-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jasmine PaoliniPaolini – Jodie Anna BurrageAnna Burrage (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Madison BrengleBrengle – Barbora StrycovaStrycova (1-4) – H2H and prediction
- Lauren DavisDavis – Tereza MartincovaMartincova (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Heather WatsonWatson – Maria Camila Osorio SerranoCamila Osorio Serrano (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Barbora KrejcikovaKrejcikova – Katie BoulterBoulter (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marie BouzkovaBouzkova – Beatriz Haddad MaiaHaddad Maia (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jessica PegulaPegula – Qinwen ZhengZheng (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernarda PeraPera – Cori GauffGauff (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Petra KvitovaKvitova – Jelena OstapenkoOstapenko (6-4) – H2H and prediction
- Shuai ZhangZhang – Harriet DartDart (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Camila GiorgiGiorgi – Anastasia PotapovaPotapova (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marketa VondrousovaVondrousova – Ons JabeurJabeur (3-3) – H2H and prediction
- Maria SakkariSakkari – Anhelina KalininaKalinina (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Karolina PliskovaPliskova – Elise MertensMertens (2-1) – H2H and prediction