![Prediction And Head To Head Rudolf Molleker Vs. Daniel Michalski 2pujxz7fwf Prediction and head to head Rudolf Molleker vs. Daniel Michalski](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Rudolf-Molleker-vs.-Daniel-Michalski-2PUJXZ7FWf.jpg)
Rudolf Molleker and Daniel Michalski will play each other in the 2nd round of the Poznan Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 12:00 pm on CENTRE COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Rudolf Molleker who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Rudolf Molleker is the pick to win this match.
Rudolf Molleker -> 1.53
Daniel Michalski -> 2.38
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Rudolf Molleker vs. Daniel Michalski
There is no head to head record between Rudolf Molleker and Daniel Michalski since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Rudolf Molleker
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 18-18 | 4-4 | 5-8 | 7-4 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
2023 | 53-35 | 2-3 | 42-25 | 6-5 | 0-1 | 3-1 |
2022 | 47-28 | 2-1 | 45-24 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 8-23 | 0-1 | 6-16 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
2020 | 0-7 | 0-1 | 0-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 264, the German reached the 2nd round after beating Oskar Grzegorzewski 6-1 6-2, Kai Wehnelt 6-4 6-4 and Tomas Machac 7-5 7-61.
In the 1st round, Molleker had a good straight sets win against Machac (7-5 7-61). During the match, Molleker scored 87 points vs Machac’s 73. Rudolf was very aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about the service games, Molleker bagged 8 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Rudolf Molleker was extremely efficient on serve to win 72% (31/43) of his 1st serve and 53% (20/38) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 3 times. Rudolf broke Machac 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Molleker has a winning win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 54% of his matches (183-154). 25-11 on clay in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Molleker has a composed138-92 record in the last 7 years on clay.
Molleker’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Oberhaching,M25 Palmanova and M25 Bodrum.
The German has a compiled 33-17 win-loss record in 2023, 25-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Poznan Challenger
Daniel Michalski
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 18-17 | 1-6 | 15-10 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 40-25 | 4-6 | 36-18 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 51-24 | 0-0 | 51-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 47-25 | 0-3 | 47-20 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 13-10 | 7-3 | 4-5 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 272, Michalski got to the 2nd round after defeating Mate Valkusz 5-7 6-4 6-1.
In the 1st round against Valkusz, The Pole recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 6-4 6-1). During the match Michalski scored 108 points vs Valkusz’s 93. The Pole was very aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Talking about serving, Michalski made 3 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Daniel Michalski lost the serve 4 times and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Michalski put 58% of his first serves in, winning 68% (39/57) of the points behind his 1st serve and 46% (19/41) on the 2nd serve. Daniel broke Valkusz 6 times after converting 55% of his break points (6/11).
The Pole’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M25 Santa Margherita di Pula.
Michalski has a compiled 23-13 win-loss record in 2023, 19-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Poznan Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2019, 2021 and 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Molleker | Michalski |
---|---|---|
Match played | 3 | 1 |
Tot Set | 6 | 3 |
Tot Games | 60 | 29 |
Pts | 207-155 | 108-93 |
Total Points | 362 | 201 |
Winners | 77 | 39 |
%Winners | 37% | 36% |
Molleker played 3 matches while Michalski competed in 1 match. Molleker started his run from the qualifications while Michalski had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Daniel Michalski surrendered 1 set while Rudolf Molleker hasn’t conceded a set so far. Molleker has played 3 sets more than Michalski (6 vs 3). Therefore, Molleker played 31 games more than Michalski. Molleker scored 77 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Michalski scored 39 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Molleker | Michalski |
---|---|---|
Aces | 23 | 3 |
Avg per match | 7.7 | 3 |
1st in | 97/174 | 57/98 |
%1st in | 56% | 58% |
1st pts | 77/97 | 39/57 |
%1st pts | 79% | 68% |
2nd pts | 48/77 | 19/41 |
%2nd pts | 62% | 46% |
Molleker made 23 aces (7.7 per match). Michalski managed to score 3 aces . Molleker won 79% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Michalski won 68% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 46% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Molleker | Michalski |
---|---|---|
Won | 10 | 6 |
Converted | 10/18 | 6/11 |
% Converted | 56% | 55% |
Conceded | 9 | 11 |
Saved | 6 | 7 |
% Saved | 67% | 64% |
Times Broken | 3 | 4 |
Rudolf broke his opponents 10 times with a 56% conversion rate. Molleker conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Michalski broke his opponent 6 times with a 55% conversion rate. Daniel conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 64% of the break points that he conceded.
Molleker | |||||
Q1 Grzegorzewski |
Q3 Wehnelt |
R1 Machac |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 6-2 | 6-4 6-4 | 7-5 7-61 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
Tot Games | 15 | 20 | 25 | 60 | |
pts | 58-34 | 62-48 | 87-73 | 207-155 | |
Total points | 92 | 110 | 160 | 362 | |
Winners | 20 | 26 | 31 | 77 | |
%Winners | 34% | 42% | 36% | 37% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 5 | 10 | 8 | 23 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
1st in | 26/39 | 28/54 | 43/81 | 97/174 | |
% 1st in | 67% | 52% | 53% | 56% | |
1st pts | 20/26 | 26/28 | 31/43 | 77/97 | |
% 1st pts | 77% | 93% | 72% | 79% | |
2nd pts | 12/13 | 16/26 | 20/38 | 48/77 | |
% 2nd pts | 92% | 62% | 53% | 62% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 4 | 2 | 4 | 10 | |
Converted | 4/9 | 2/3 | 4/6 | 10/18 | |
Converted % | 44% | 67% | 67% | 56% | |
Conceded | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 0/0 | 6/9 | 6 | |
Saved % | – | – | 67% | 22% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Michalski | |||||
R1 Valkusz |
Total | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 5-7 6-4 6-1 | ||||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |||
Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |||
pts | 108-93 | 108-93 | |||
Total points | 201 | 201 | |||
Winners | 39 | 39 | |||
%Winners | 36% | 36% | |||
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |||
Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |||
1st in | 57/98 | 57/98 | |||
% 1st in | 58% | 58% | |||
1st pts | 39/57 | 39/57 | |||
% 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |||
2nd pts | 19/41 | 19/41 | |||
% 2nd pts | 46% | 46% | |||
Breaks | |||||
Won | 6 | 6 | |||
Converted | 6/11 | 6/11 | |||
Converted % | 55% | 55% | |||
Conceded | 11 | 11 | |||
Saved | 7/11 | 7 | |||
Saved % | 64% | 21% | |||
Times Broken | 4 | 4 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Poznan Challenger
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – Kacper ZukZuk (6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (3-6 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Pol Martin TiffonMartin Tiffon – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (7-5 7-64) – See score progression
- Ulises BlanchBlanch – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (7-65 ret.) – See score progression
- Timo StodderStodder – David Jorda SanchisJorda Sanchis (7-62 6-3) – See score progression
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Tomas MachacMachac (7-5 7-61) – See score progression
- Sumit NagalNagal – Leo BorgBorg (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Tomas Barrios VeraBarrios Vera – Max HoukesHoukes (6-1 7-62) – See score progression
- Jerome KymKym – Neil OberleitnerOberleitner (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Mariano NavoneNavone – Federico CoriaCoria (3-6 6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (6-2 4-3 ret.) – See score progression
- Dali BlanchBlanch – Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Giovanni Mpetshi PerricardMpetshi Perricard – Jakub MensikMensik (7-68 3-6 7-611) – See score progression
- Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (6-1 2-6 7-64) – See score progression
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – Mate ValkuszValkusz (5-7 6-4 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – Zdenek KolarKolar (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pol Martin TiffonMartin Tiffon – Timo StodderStodder (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – Sumit NagalNagal (1-0) – H2H and prediction