![Prediction And Head To Head Facundo Diaz Acosta Vs. Sumit Nagal Orupfuuwbj Prediction and head to head Facundo Diaz Acosta vs. Sumit Nagal](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Facundo-Diaz-Acosta-vs.-Sumit-Nagal-oRUPFuUWBJ.jpg)
Facundo Diaz Acosta and Sumit Nagal will square off in the 2nd round of the Poznan Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 12:30 pm on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Facundo Diaz Acosta who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Facundo Diaz Acosta is the pick to win this match.
Facundo Diaz Acosta -> 1.55
Sumit Nagal -> 2.34
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Facundo Diaz Acosta vs. Sumit Nagal
This will be the 2nd time that Facundo Diaz Acosta and Sumit Nagal fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Diaz Acosta (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they competed against each other, Diaz Acosta won 6-4 2-6 6-3 in the qualifications in Cordoba back in 2021.
Facundo Diaz Acosta
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 15-12 | 2-4 | 13-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 50-25 | 4-4 | 46-20 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 31-21 | 0-1 | 31-19 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2021 | 43-30 | 7-4 | 36-26 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 22-12 | 10-7 | 12-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 117, Facundo got to the 2nd round after beating Lorenzo Giustino 3-6 6-2 6-4.
In the 1st round against Giustino, Diaz Acosta recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-2 6-4). During the match, Diaz Acosta scored 94 points vs Giustino’s 84. The Argentine was very aggressive to blast 46 winners.
Regarding the service games, Diaz Acosta recorded 3 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Facundo Diaz Acosta lost the serve 3 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Diaz Acosta put 66% of his first serves in, winning 71% (46/65) of the points behind his 1st serve and 41% (14/34) on the 2nd serve. Facundo was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Giustino 4 times.
Diaz Acosta has a solid win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 62% of his matches (168-101). 26-12 on clay in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Diaz Acosta has an overall148-86 record in the last 7 years on clay.
His best result of the season was winning the title the Savannah Challenger where he beat Tristan Boyer in the final 6-3 6-1 and the Oeiras 4 Challenger where he beat Aleksandar Vukic in the final 6-4 6-3.
Diaz Acosta has a composed 29-14 win-loss record in 2023, 26-12 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Poznan Challenger
Facundo has never competed in this tournament before.
Sumit Nagal
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 28-14 | 15-8 | 13-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 46-29 | 9-8 | 32-17 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 17-18 | 0-1 | 16-17 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 23-26 | 1-4 | 22-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 8-14 | 2-4 | 5-5 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 226, the Indian got to the 2nd round after beating Leo Borg 6-2 6-3.
In the 1st round, Sumit had a good straight sets win against Borg (6-2 6-3). During the match Nagal scored 59 points vs Borg’s 34. Sumit was quite aggressive to blast 22 winners.
About the serving games, Nagal made 2 aces and he was pretty consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Sumit Nagal was extremely effective on serve to win 81% (22/27) of his 1st serve and 85% (11/13) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Nagal broke Borg 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
His best result of the season was conquering the title the Rome Challenger where he overcame Jesper De Jong in the final 6-3 6-2.
Sumit has an overall 26-15 win-loss record in 2023, 18-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Diaz Acosta | Nagal |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
Tot Games | 27 | 17 |
Pts | 94-84 | 59-34 |
Total Points | 178 | 93 |
Winners | 46 | 22 |
%Winners | 49% | 37% |
Both Diaz Acosta and Nagal played 1 match. At the moment, Facundo Diaz Acosta dropped 1 set while Sumit Nagal hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Diaz Acosta has played 1 set more than Nagal (3 vs 2). Therefore, Diaz Acosta played 10 games more than Nagal. Diaz Acosta scored 46 winners (49% of the total points). On the other side, Sumit scored 22 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Diaz Acosta | Nagal |
---|---|---|
Aces | 3 | 2 |
Avg per match | 3 | 2 |
1st in | 65/99 | 27/40 |
%1st in | 66% | 68% |
1st pts | 46/65 | 22/27 |
%1st pts | 71% | 81% |
2nd pts | 14/34 | 11/13 |
%2nd pts | 41% | 85% |
Diaz Acosta blasted 3 aces . Nagal managed to score 2 aces . Diaz Acosta won 71% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 41% of the points. On the other side, Nagal won 81% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 85% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Diaz Acosta | Nagal |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 4 |
Converted | 4/4 | 4/11 |
% Converted | 100% | 36% |
Conceded | 6 | 3 |
Saved | 3 | 3 |
% Saved | 50% | 100% |
Times Broken | 3 | 0 |
The Argentine broke his opponent 4 times with a 100% conversion rate. The Argentine surrendered his serve 3 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Sumit broke his opponent 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. Nagal was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points.
Diaz Acosta | |||
R1 Giustino |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 3-6 6-2 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
pts | 94-84 | 94-84 | |
Total points | 178 | 178 | |
Winners | 46 | 46 | |
%Winners | 49% | 49% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
1st in | 65/99 | 65/99 | |
% 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
1st pts | 46/65 | 46/65 | |
% 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
2nd pts | 14/34 | 14/34 | |
% 2nd pts | 41% | 41% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/4 | 4/4 | |
Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
Saved | 3/6 | 3 | |
Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Nagal | |||
R1 Borg |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
pts | 59-34 | 59-34 | |
Total points | 93 | 93 | |
Winners | 22 | 22 | |
%Winners | 37% | 37% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 2 | 2 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 27/40 | 27/40 | |
% 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
1st pts | 22/27 | 22/27 | |
% 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
2nd pts | 11/13 | 11/13 | |
% 2nd pts | 85% | 85% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/11 | 4/11 | |
Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Poznan Challenger
- Jerome KymKym – Neil OberleitnerOberleitner (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Mariano NavoneNavone – Federico CoriaCoria (3-6 6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (6-2 4-3 ret.) – See score progression
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – Kacper ZukZuk (6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (3-6 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Pol Martin TiffonMartin Tiffon – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (7-5 7-64) – See score progression
- Ulises BlanchBlanch – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (7-65 ret.) – See score progression
- Timo StodderStodder – David Jorda SanchisJorda Sanchis (7-62 6-3) – See score progression
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Tomas MachacMachac (7-5 7-61) – See score progression
- Sumit NagalNagal – Leo BorgBorg (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Tomas Barrios VeraBarrios Vera – Max HoukesHoukes (6-1 7-62) – See score progression
- Giovanni Mpetshi PerricardMpetshi Perricard – Jakub MensikMensik (7-68 3-6 7-611) – See score progression
- Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (6-1 2-6 7-64) – See score progression
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – Mate ValkuszValkusz (5-7 6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Dali BlanchBlanch – Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – Zdenek KolarKolar (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pol Martin TiffonMartin Tiffon – Timo StodderStodder (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – Sumit NagalNagal (1-0) – H2H and prediction