Raul Brancaccio and Charles Broom will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Ilkley Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 7:30 pm on CENTRE COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Charles Broom who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Charles Broom is the pick to win this match.
Charles Broom -> 1.84
Raul Brancaccio -> 1.89
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Raul Brancaccio vs. Charles Broom
There is no head to head record between Raul Brancaccio and Charles Broom since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Raul Brancaccio
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 12-16 | 6-5 | 6-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 28-32 | 14-7 | 11-19 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 39-26 | 7-6 | 31-18 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 47-26 | 2-1 | 43-21 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-12 | 1-1 | 3-4 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 138, Brancaccio reached the 2nd round after defeating Johannus Monday 6-3 6-3.
In the 1st round, Brancaccio had a good straight sets win against Monday (6-3 6-3). During the match, Brancaccio scored 61 points vs Monday’s 39. The Italian was very aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Regarding the service games, Brancaccio couldn’t to score even 1 ace in the match and he committed only 2 double faults. Raul Brancaccio was pretty effective on serve to win 85% (23/27) of his 1st serve and 76% (13/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Raul broke Monday 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Brancaccio has a winning match record in the last 8 years having won 59% of his matches (284-197). 1-0 on grass in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Brancaccio has an aggregate1-0 match record in the last 8 years on grass.
His best result of the year was winning the title the Noumea Challenger where he beat Laurent Lokoli in the final 4-6 7-5 6-2.
Brancaccio has an aggregate 17-16 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Ilkley Challenger
The Italian has never competed in this tournament before.
Charles Broom
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 30-19 | 15-7 | 0-0 | 7-6 | 8-6 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-34 | 8-7 | 0-4 | 20-15 | 11-6 | 2-2 |
| 2022 | 44-30 | 28-17 | 0-0 | 10-7 | 6-6 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 35-10 | 20-6 | 8-3 | 7-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-3 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 435, Broom got to the 2nd round after beating Franco Agamenone 6-2 3-0 ret., Dennis Novak 7-61 6-75 7-66 and Gijs Brouwer 7-65 6-2.
In the 1st round, Broom had a good straight sets win against Brouwer (7-65 6-2). During the match Broom scored 73 points vs Brouwer’s 62. The Brit was quite aggressive to blast 38 winners.
About the serving games, Broom made 10 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Charles Broom was extremely efficient on serve to win 83% (38/46) of his 1st serve and 57% (12/21) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Charles broke Brouwer twice after converting 29% of his break points (2/7).
The Brit’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Sheffield.
Charles has a composed 15-17 win-loss record in 2023, 3-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Ilkley Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Brancaccio | Broom |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 71 |
| Pts | 61-39 | 253-219 |
| Total Points | 100 | 472 |
| Winners | 23 | 113 |
| %Winners | 38% | 45% |
Brancaccio played 1 match while Broom competed in 3 matches. Broom started his run from the qualifications while Brancaccio had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Charles Broom dropped 1 set while Raul Brancaccio hasn’t conceded a set so far. Brancaccio has played 6 set(s) less than Broom (2 vs 8). Therefore, Brancaccio played 53 games less than Broom. Brancaccio scored 23 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, The Brit struck 113 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Brancaccio | Broom |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 21 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 7 |
| 1st in | 27/44 | 152/234 |
| %1st in | 61% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 23/27 | 113/152 |
| %1st pts | 85% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 13/17 | 41/82 |
| %2nd pts | 76% | 50% |
Brancaccio didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Broom made 21 aces (7 per match). Brancaccio won 85% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 76% of the points. On the other side, Broom won 74% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Brancaccio | Broom |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 10 |
| Converted | 3/9 | 10/24 |
| % Converted | 33% | 42% |
| Conceded | 0 | 13 |
| Saved | 0 | 8 |
| % Saved | 0% | 62% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 5 |
The Italian broke his opponent 3 times with a 33% conversion rate. Raul had a solid display on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 0 break points. Charles broke his opponents 10 times with a 42% conversion rate. The Brit conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 62% of the break points that he conceded.
| Brancaccio | |||
| R1 Monday |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 61-39 | 61-39 | |
| Total points | 100 | 100 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 27/44 | 27/44 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 23/27 | 23/27 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/17 | 13/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 76% | 76% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 3/9 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Broom | |||||
| Q1 Agamenone |
Q3 Novak |
R1 Brouwer |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 3-0 ret. | 7-61 6-75 7-66 | 7-65 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 11 | 39 | 21 | 71 | |
| pts | 39-23 | 141-134 | 73-62 | 253-219 | |
| Total points | 62 | 275 | 135 | 472 | |
| Winners | 16 | 59 | 38 | 113 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 42% | 52% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 1 | 10 | 10 | 21 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 8 | 4 | 15 | |
| 1st in | 23/35 | 83/132 | 46/67 | 152/234 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 63% | 69% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 16/23 | 59/83 | 38/46 | 113/152 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 71% | 83% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/12 | 23/49 | 12/21 | 41/82 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 47% | 57% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 2 | 10 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/12 | 2/7 | 10/24 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 33% | 29% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 8 | 4 | 13 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 4/8 | 4/4 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 50% | 100% | 150% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 | 0 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLLWWLLW
LLLWLWLWWW Tennis Scores in Ilkley Challenger
- Charles BroomBroom – Gijs BrouwerBrouwer (7-65 6-2) – See score progression
- Denis KudlaKudla – Hamad MedjedovicMedjedovic (6-3 7-65) – See score progression
- Otto VirtanenVirtanen – Norbert GombosGombos (7-62 7-5) – See score progression
- Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio – Johannus MondayMonday (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Alex BoltBolt – Toby SamuelSamuel (2-6 7-66 7-5) – See score progression
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Laurent LokoliLokoli (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (6-79 6-3 7-67) – See score progression
- Zizou BergsBergs – Jurij RodionovRodionov (7-61 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Emilio GomezGomez – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- David GoffinGoffin – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler – Alexander RitschardRitschard (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nuno BorgesBorges – Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio – Charles BroomBroom (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zizou BergsBergs – Denis KudlaKudla (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Harry WendelkenWendelken (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Alex BoltBolt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Otto VirtanenVirtanen – Sebastian OfnerOfner (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
