Jerome Kym and Neil Oberleitner will fight against each other in the 1st round of the Poznan Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 1:00 pm on COURT 2. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jerome Kym who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jerome Kym is the pick to win this match.
Jerome Kym -> 1.25
Neil Oberleitner -> 3.65
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jerome Kym vs. Neil Oberleitner
There is no head to head record between Jerome Kym and Neil Oberleitner since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Jerome Kym
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 35-9 | 6-1 | 27-6 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 23-9 | 0-0 | 18-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 5-0 |
| 2022 | 41-22 | 17-5 | 12-9 | 9-5 | 0-0 | 3-3 |
| 2021 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2020 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 367 (career-high), the Swiss got to the 1st round after beating Petr Nouza 7-5 7-610 and Emilio Nava 6-3 7-62.
In the qualifications, The Swiss had a good straight sets win against Nouza (7-5 7-610). During the match, Kym scored 86 points vs Nouza’s 80. Jerome was extremely aggressive to blast 43 winners.
Regarding the service games, Kym recorded 7 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Jerome Kym was pretty effective on serve to win 77% (43/56) of his 1st serve and 53% (18/34) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Jerome was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Nouza once.
Kym has a solid win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 64% of his matches (68-39). 14-7 on clay in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Kym has an overall30-21 match record in the last 5 years on clay.
The Swiss’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Trento.
The Swiss has an aggregate 19-7 win-loss record in 2023, 14-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Poznan Challenger
Jerome has never competed in this tournament before.
Neil Oberleitner
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 26-16 | 0-0 | 19-8 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| 2023 | 37-30 | 10-8 | 15-15 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 8-2 |
| 2022 | 30-31 | 14-15 | 16-16 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 30-25 | 17-12 | 10-11 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-14 | 6-11 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 566 (career-high), the Austrian got to the 1st round after defeating Saba Purtseladze 6-4 6-0 and Carlos Taberner 6-1 7-5.
In the qualifications, Oberleitner had a good straight sets win against Purtseladze (6-4 6-0). During the match Oberleitner scored 80 points vs Purtseladze’s 57. The Austrian was extremely aggressive to blast 22 winners.
About the serving games, Oberleitner fired 4 aces and he was quite consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Neil Oberleitner was quite effective on serve to win 73% (22/30) of his 1st serve and 64% (18/28) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Oberleitner broke Purtseladze 4 times after converting 29% of his break points (4/14).
Oberleitner’s best result of the year was reaching the final in Foncenex and M15 Osijek.
Neil has an overall 23-9 win-loss record in 2023, 8-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kym | Oberleitner |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 47 | 35 |
| Pts | 166-141 | 152-109 |
| Total Points | 307 | 261 |
| Winners | 79 | 51 |
| %Winners | 48% | 34% |
Both Kym and Oberleitner played 2 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Kym and Oberleitner have played the same amount of sets 4. However, Kym played 12 games more than Oberleitner. The Swiss scored 79 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, The Austrian made 51 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kym | Oberleitner |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 16 | 11 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 5.5 |
| 1st in | 101/161 | 65/121 |
| %1st in | 63% | 54% |
| 1st pts | 79/101 | 51/65 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 34/60 | 29/56 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 52% |
Kym managed to score 16 aces (8 per match). Oberleitner fired 11 aces (5.5 per match). Kym won 78% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Oberleitner won 78% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kym | Oberleitner |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 9 |
| Converted | 3/8 | 9/24 |
| % Converted | 38% | 38% |
| Conceded | 14 | 11 |
| Saved | 13 | 9 |
| % Saved | 93% | 82% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
Kym broke his opponents 3 times with a 38% conversion rate. Kym lost his serve once and he saved 93% of the break points that he conceded. The Austrian broke his opponents 9 times with a 38% conversion rate. Neil conceded his serve twice and he saved 82% of the break points that he conceded.
| Kym | |||
| Q1 Nouza |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 7-610 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
| pts | 86-80 | 86-80 | |
| Total points | 166 | 166 | |
| Winners | 43 | 43 | |
| %Winners | 50% | 50% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 56/90 | 56/90 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 43/56 | 43/56 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/34 | 18/34 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 1 | 1 | |
| Converted | 1/1 | 1/1 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 6/6 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Oberleitner | |||
| Q1 Purtseladze |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 80-57 | 80-57 | |
| Total points | 137 | 137 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 28% | 28% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 30/58 | 30/58 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 22/30 | 22/30 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/28 | 18/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/14 | 4/14 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 29% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 5/5 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWWWWWW
WWLWLWWLWW Tennis Scores in Poznan Challenger
- Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (6-1 2-6 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Dali BlanchBlanch – Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (6-2 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Giovanni Mpetshi PerricardGiovanni – Jakub MensikJakub (7-6(8) 3-6 7-6(11)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- David Jorda SanchisJorda Sanchis – Timo StodderStodder (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sumit NagalNagal – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – Kacper ZukZuk (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ulises BlanchBlanch – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Manuel GuinardGuinard (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Tomas MachacMachac (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – Mate ValkuszValkusz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Pol Martin TiffonMartin Tiffon (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mariano NavoneNavone – Federico CoriaCoria (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Max HoukesHoukes – Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
