Emilio Nava and Jerome Kym will square off in the qualifications of the Poznan Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Emilio Nava who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Emilio Nava is the pick to win this match.
Emilio Nava -> 1.68
Jerome Kym -> 2.09
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Emilio Nava vs. Jerome Kym
There is no head to head record between Emilio Nava and Jerome Kym since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Emilio Nava
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21-20 | 11-8 | 4-6 | 4-2 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-31 | 24-14 | 12-8 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-27 | 15-15 | 14-6 | 12-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 40-16 | 9-6 | 27-7 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-12 | 10-7 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 210, the American reached the qualifications after defeating David Pichler 7-63 4-6 6-2.
In the qualifications, Nava defeated Pichler (7-63 4-6 6-2). During the match, Nava scored 104 points vs Pichler’s 96. Nava was pretty aggressive to blast 54 winners.
Talking about the service games, Nava made 8 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Emilio Nava lost the serve once and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Nava put 66% of his first serves in, winning 81% (54/67) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (16/34) on the 2nd serve. Emilio broke Pichler twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Nava has a solid match record in the last 6 years having won 60% of his matches (128-86). 7-7 on clay in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Nava has an aggregate56-27 match record in the last 6 years on clay.
Emilio has an overall 15-17 win-loss record in 2023, 7-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Poznan Challenger
Nava has never competed in this tournament before.
Jerome Kym
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 35-10 | 6-1 | 27-7 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 23-9 | 0-0 | 18-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 5-0 |
| 2022 | 41-22 | 17-5 | 12-9 | 9-5 | 0-0 | 3-3 |
| 2021 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2020 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 367 (career-high), Jerome reached the qualifications after defeating Petr Nouza 7-5 7-610.
In the qualifications, Jerome had a good straight sets win against Nouza (7-5 7-610). During the match Kym scored 86 points vs Nouza’s 80. Kym was very aggressive to blast 43 winners.
About the serving games, Kym recorded 7 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Jerome Kym was extremely efficient on serve to win 77% (43/56) of his 1st serve and 53% (18/34) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Jerome was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Nouza once.
The Swiss’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Trento.
Jerome has an overall 19-7 win-loss record in 2023, 14-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Nava | Kym |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 31 | 25 |
| Pts | 104-96 | 86-80 |
| Total Points | 200 | 166 |
| Winners | 54 | 43 |
| %Winners | 52% | 50% |
Both Nava and Kym played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Emilio Nava lost 1 set while Jerome Kym hasn’t lost a set so far. Nava has played 1 set more than Kym (3 vs 2). Therefore, Nava played 6 games more than Kym. The American scored 54 winners (52% of the total points). On the other side, Kym struck 43 winners (50%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Nava | Kym |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 7 |
| 1st in | 67/101 | 56/90 |
| %1st in | 66% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 54/67 | 43/56 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 16/34 | 18/34 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 53% |
Nava fired 8 aces . Kym made 7 aces . Nava won 81% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Kym won 77% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Nava | Kym |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 1 |
| Converted | 2/5 | 1/1 |
| % Converted | 40% | 100% |
| Conceded | 7 | 6 |
| Saved | 6 | 6 |
| % Saved | 86% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
Emilio broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. Nava dropped his serve once and he saved 86% of the break points that he conceded. Kym broke his opponent once with a 100% conversion rate. Kym was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 6 break points.
| Nava | |||
| Q1 Pichler |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 4-6 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 104-96 | 104-96 | |
| Total points | 200 | 200 | |
| Winners | 54 | 54 | |
| %Winners | 52% | 52% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 67/101 | 67/101 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 54/67 | 54/67 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/34 | 16/34 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/5 | 2/5 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 6/7 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 86% | 86% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Kym | |||
| Q1 Nouza |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 7-610 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
| pts | 86-80 | 86-80 | |
| Total points | 166 | 166 | |
| Winners | 43 | 43 | |
| %Winners | 50% | 50% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 56/90 | 56/90 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 43/56 | 43/56 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/34 | 18/34 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 1 | 1 | |
| Converted | 1/1 | 1/1 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 6/6 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLLWLLLW
LLWWWWWWWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Nerman FaticFatic – Tomas MachacMachac (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sumit NagalNagal – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – Neil OberleitnerOberleitner (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano – Manuel GuinardGuinard (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos Sanchez JoverSanchez Jover – Ulises BlanchBlanch (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Kai WehneltWehnelt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio NavaNava – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – Mate ValkuszValkusz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Pol Martin TiffonMartin Tiffon (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian GimaGima – David Jorda SanchisJorda Sanchis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mariano NavoneNavone – Federico CoriaCoria (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Max HoukesHoukes – Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
