David Jorda Sanchis and Sebastian Gima will play each other in the qualifications of the Poznan Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 11:00 am on COURT 2. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is David Jorda Sanchis who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, David Jorda Sanchis is the pick to win this match.
David Jorda Sanchis -> 1.74
Sebastian Gima -> 2.01
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head David Jorda Sanchis vs. Sebastian Gima
There is no head to head record between David Jorda Sanchis and Sebastian Gima since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
David Jorda Sanchis
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13-21 | 4-3 | 8-12 | 1-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-35 | 8-7 | 25-19 | 3-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 35-19 | 14-4 | 20-14 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 5-8 | 0-1 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-9 | 2-2 | 6-5 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 442 (career-high), David reached the qualifications after beating Aleksander Blus 6-2 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Spaniard had a good straight sets win against Blus (6-2 6-2). During the match, Jorda Sanchis scored 65 points vs Blus’s 44. The Spaniard was exceptionally aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Talking about the service games, Jorda Sanchis scored just 1 ace during the match and he committed only 5 double faults. David Jorda Sanchis lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Jorda Sanchis put 53% of his first serves in, winning 76% (19/25) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (10/22) on the 2nd serve. Jorda Sanchis broke Blus 6 times after converting 40% of his break points (6/15).
Jorda Sanchis has a winning match record in the last 8 years having won 58% of his matches (205-146). 13-9 on clay in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Jorda Sanchis has a compiled120-81 record in the last 8 years on clay.
The Spaniard’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Gurb.
The Spaniard has an overall 21-18 win-loss record in 2023, 13-9 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Poznan Challenger
The Spaniard has never competed in this tournament before.
Sebastian Gima
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23-20 | 0-2 | 23-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 57-35 | 15-8 | 41-25 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 48-30 | 25-11 | 23-18 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 31-24 | 1-3 | 28-20 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-9 | 7-5 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 501, Gima reached the qualifications after defeating Robert Strombachs 6-3 7-5.
In the qualifications, Sebastian had a good straight sets win against Strombachs (6-3 7-5). During the match Gima scored 69 points vs Strombachs’s 57. Gima was extremely aggressive to blast 20 winners.
About the serving games, Gima fired 2 aces and he was quite consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Sebastian Gima lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Gima put 41% of his first serves in, winning 83% (20/24) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (17/34) on the 2nd serve. Sebastian broke Strombachs 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
The Romanian’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M15 Heraklion and M25 Kursumlijska Banja.
Gima has a compiled 32-16 win-loss record in 2023, 24-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Jorda Sanchis | Gima |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 21 |
| Pts | 65-44 | 69-57 |
| Total Points | 109 | 126 |
| Winners | 19 | 20 |
| %Winners | 29% | 29% |
Both Jorda Sanchis and Gima played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Jorda Sanchis and Gima have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Jorda Sanchis played 5 games less than Gima. David scored 19 winners (29% of the total points). On the other side, The Romanian bagged 20 winners (29%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Jorda Sanchis | Gima |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 2 |
| 1st in | 25/47 | 24/58 |
| %1st in | 53% | 41% |
| 1st pts | 19/25 | 20/24 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 83% |
| 2nd pts | 10/22 | 17/34 |
| %2nd pts | 45% | 50% |
Jorda Sanchis struck 1 ace . Gima also fired 2 aces . Jorda Sanchis won 76% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 45% of the points. On the other side, Gima won 83% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Jorda Sanchis | Gima |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 5 |
| Converted | 6/15 | 5/7 |
| % Converted | 40% | 71% |
| Conceded | 4 | 6 |
| Saved | 2 | 4 |
| % Saved | 50% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
David broke his opponent 6 times with a 40% conversion rate. David lost his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The Romanian broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. Sebastian conceded his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Jorda Sanchis | |||
| Q1 Blus |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 65-44 | 65-44 | |
| Total points | 109 | 109 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 29% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 25/47 | 25/47 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 19/25 | 19/25 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/22 | 10/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/15 | 6/15 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Gima | |||
| Q1 Strombachs |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 69-57 | 69-57 | |
| Total points | 126 | 126 | |
| Winners | 20 | 20 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 29% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 24/58 | 24/58 | |
| % 1st in | 41% | 41% | |
| 1st pts | 20/24 | 20/24 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/34 | 17/34 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWLWLWLL
LWLWLLWWLL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Nerman FaticFatic – Tomas MachacMachac (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sumit NagalNagal – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano – Manuel GuinardGuinard (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos Sanchez JoverSanchez Jover – Ulises BlanchBlanch (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Kai WehneltWehnelt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Neil OberleitnerOberleitner – Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio NavaNava – David PichlerPichler (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – Mate ValkuszValkusz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Pol Martin TiffonMartin Tiffon (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian GimaGima – David Jorda SanchisJorda Sanchis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mariano NavoneNavone – Federico CoriaCoria (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Max HoukesHoukes – Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
