Rudolf Molleker and Kai Wehnelt will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Poznan Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 11:00 am on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Rudolf Molleker who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Rudolf Molleker is the pick to win this match.
Rudolf Molleker -> 1.24
Kai Wehnelt -> 3.74
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Rudolf Molleker vs. Kai Wehnelt
There is no head to head record between Rudolf Molleker and Kai Wehnelt since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Rudolf Molleker
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 17-16 | 4-4 | 5-7 | 7-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-35 | 2-3 | 42-25 | 6-5 | 0-1 | 3-1 |
| 2022 | 47-28 | 2-1 | 45-24 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 8-23 | 0-1 | 6-16 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-7 | 0-1 | 0-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 262, the German reached the qualifications after beating Oskar Grzegorzewski 6-1 6-2.
In the qualifications, The German had a good straight sets win against Grzegorzewski (6-1 6-2). During the match, Molleker scored 58 points vs Grzegorzewski’s 34. Rudolf was pretty aggressive to blast 20 winners.
Talking about the service games, Molleker struck 5 aces and he was exceptionally solid in conceding no double faults. Rudolf Molleker was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 77% (20/26) of his 1st serve and 92% (12/13) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Molleker broke Grzegorzewski 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Molleker has a winning match record in the last 7 years having won 54% of his matches (181-154). 23-11 on clay in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Molleker has an aggregate136-92 match record in the last 7 years on clay.
Molleker’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Oberhaching,M25 Palmanova and M25 Bodrum.
Molleker has an overall 31-17 win-loss record in 2023, 23-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Poznan Challenger
Kai Wehnelt
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 7-8 | 1-2 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-2 |
| 2023 | 36-33 | 16-8 | 20-21 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 29-31 | 4-6 | 19-20 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2021 | 29-26 | 16-9 | 12-14 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-5 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
Ranked no. 603, Kai got to the qualifications after defeating Kalin Ivanovski 6-3 3-6 6-3.
In the qualifications, Wehnelt defeated Ivanovski (6-3 3-6 6-3). During the match Wehnelt scored 97 points vs Ivanovski’s 93. The German was pretty aggressive to blast 50 winners.
About the serving games, Wehnelt managed to score 3 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Kai Wehnelt lost the serve twice and he saved 9 break points. Furthermore, Wehnelt put 63% of his first serves in, winning 69% (50/72) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (19/43) on the 2nd serve. Kai broke Ivanovski 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Wehnelt has a composed 12-13 win-loss record in 2023, 9-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Poznan Challenger
Kai has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Molleker | Wehnelt |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 27 |
| Pts | 58-34 | 97-93 |
| Total Points | 92 | 190 |
| Winners | 20 | 50 |
| %Winners | 34% | 52% |
Both Molleker and Wehnelt played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Kai Wehnelt dropped 1 set while Rudolf Molleker hasn’t conceded a set so far. Molleker has played 1 set(s) less than Wehnelt (2 vs 3). Therefore, Molleker played 12 games less than Wehnelt. Molleker scored 20 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, Wehnelt managed to score 50 winners (52%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Molleker | Wehnelt |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 3 |
| 1st in | 26/39 | 72/115 |
| %1st in | 67% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 20/26 | 50/72 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 12/13 | 19/43 |
| %2nd pts | 92% | 44% |
Molleker struck 5 aces . Wehnelt struck 3 aces . Molleker won 77% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 92% of the points. On the other side, Wehnelt won 69% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 44% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Molleker | Wehnelt |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 3 |
| Converted | 4/9 | 3/7 |
| % Converted | 44% | 43% |
| Conceded | 0 | 11 |
| Saved | 0 | 9 |
| % Saved | 0% | 82% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Molleker broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Rudolf had a solid display on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points. The German broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. Wehnelt conceded his serve twice and he saved 82% of the break points that he conceded.
| Molleker | |||
| Q1 Grzegorzewski |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 58-34 | 58-34 | |
| Total points | 92 | 92 | |
| Winners | 20 | 20 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 26/39 | 26/39 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 20/26 | 20/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/13 | 12/13 | |
| % 2nd pts | 92% | 92% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Wehnelt | |||
| Q1 Ivanovski |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | 97-93 | 97-93 | |
| Total points | 190 | 190 | |
| Winners | 50 | 50 | |
| %Winners | 52% | 52% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 72/115 | 72/115 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 50/72 | 50/72 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/43 | 19/43 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
| Saved | 9/11 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 82% | 82% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLLWWLWL
LWWLWLWWLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Nerman FaticFatic – Tomas MachacMachac (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sumit NagalNagal – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano – Manuel GuinardGuinard (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos Sanchez JoverSanchez Jover – Ulises BlanchBlanch (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Kai WehneltWehnelt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Neil OberleitnerOberleitner – Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio NavaNava – David PichlerPichler (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – Mate ValkuszValkusz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Pol Martin TiffonMartin Tiffon (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian GimaGima – David Jorda SanchisJorda Sanchis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mariano NavoneNavone – Federico CoriaCoria (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Max HoukesHoukes – Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
