Tallon Griekspoor and Jordan Thompson will face off in the final of the Libema Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 2:30 pm on CENTRE COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tallon Griekspoor who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tallon Griekspoor is the pick to win this match.
Tallon Griekspoor -> 1.49
Jordan Thompson -> 2.62
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Tallon Griekspoor vs. Jordan Thompson
This will be the 2nd time that Tallon Griekspoor and Jordan Thompson fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Thompson (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on grass.
The last time that they competed against each other, Thompson won 4-6 7-5 6-3 in the Rubber 1 in 0 back in 2022.
Tallon Griekspoor
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33-30 | 10-11 | 8-8 | 11-8 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-24 | 14-10 | 3-5 | 12-7 | 7-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 28-27 | 5-6 | 12-6 | 4-11 | 7-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 59-17 | 11-3 | 36-10 | 9-3 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 18-9 | 3-1 | 12-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 38, the Dutch reached the final after defeating Mikael Ymer 6-2 3-6 6-3, Alexei Popyrin 6-3 6-2, Alex De Minaur 4-6 6-3 6-4 and Emil Ruusuvuori 6-4 7-5.
In the semifinal, Tallon had a good straight sets win against Ruusuvuori (6-4 7-5). During the match, Griekspoor scored 65 points vs Ruusuvuori’s 59. Griekspoor was pretty aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about the service games, Griekspoor managed to score 9 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Tallon Griekspoor was quite effective on serve to win 87% (33/38) of his 1st serve and 58% (15/26) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Tallon broke Ruusuvuori twice after converting 33% of his break points (2/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Griekspoor has surrendered 2 set in this tournament to conquer 54% of the points he played.
Griekspoor has a solid match record in the last 9 years having won 64% of his matches (323-179). 4-0 on grass in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Griekspoor has a compiled15-7 match record in the last 9 years on grass.
His best result of the year was conquering the title in Pune where he defeated Benjamin Bonzi in the final 4-6 7-5 6-3.
The Dutch has an overall 20-10 win-loss record in 2023, 4-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in ‘s-Hertogenbosch
Jordan Thompson
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 35-24 | 23-13 | 3-5 | 5-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-28 | 22-15 | 0-3 | 7-4 | 12-6 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-26 | 18-14 | 2-6 | 8-1 | 12-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-25 | 10-11 | 2-6 | 0-1 | 9-5 | 2-2 |
| 2020 | 12-13 | 6-6 | 1-2 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 103, Jordan got to the final after beating Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard 6-4 7-63, Milos Raonic 7-64 6-1, Adrian Mannarino 5-7 7-62 6-2 and Rinky Hijikata 7-65 6-3.
In the semifinal, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Hijikata (7-65 6-3). During the match Thompson scored 78 points vs Hijikata’s 66. Thompson was pretty aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about serving, Thompson bagged 4 aces and he was pretty consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Jordan Thompson was pretty effective on serve to win 79% (31/39) of his 1st serve and 72% (21/29) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Thompson broke Hijikata once after converting 50% of his break points (1/2).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Australian has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 55% of the points he played.
His best result of the year was winning the title the Rome Challenger where he overcame Alex Michelsen in the final 6-4 6-2 and the Gwangju Challenger where he beat Max Purcell in the final 6-3 6-2.
The Australian has a composed 26-13 win-loss record in 2023, 7-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in ‘s-Hertogenbosch
Previously, his best result was reaching the final in 2019. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Griekspoor | Thompson |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 10 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 94 | 98 |
| Pts | 296-255 | 333-274 |
| Total Points | 551 | 607 |
| Winners | 145 | 137 |
| %Winners | 49% | 41% |
Both Griekspoor and Thompson played 4 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Tallon Griekspoor lost 2 sets, while Jordan Thompson conceded 1 set. Griekspoor has played 1 set more than Thompson (10 vs 9). However, it’s interesting to notice that Griekspoor played 4 games less than Thompson. The Dutch scored 145 winners (49% of the total points). On the other side, Thompson fired 137 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Griekspoor | Thompson |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 36 | 25 |
| Avg per match | 9 | 6.3 |
| 1st in | 183/283 | 170/281 |
| %1st in | 65% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 145/183 | 137/170 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 59/100 | 78/111 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 70% |
Griekspoor fired 36 aces (9 per match). Thompson fired 25 aces (6.3 per match). Griekspoor won 79% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Thompson won 81% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 70% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Griekspoor | Thompson |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 10 | 7 |
| Converted | 10/22 | 7/19 |
| % Converted | 45% | 37% |
| Conceded | 19 | 7 |
| Saved | 17 | 5 |
| % Saved | 89% | 71% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
The Dutch broke his opponents 10 times with a 45% conversion rate. Griekspoor conceded his serve twice and he saved 89% of the break points that he conceded. The Australian broke his opponents 7 times with a 37% conversion rate. The Australian conceded his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded.
| Griekspoor | ||||||
| R1 Ymer |
R2 Popyrin |
1/4 De Minaur |
1/2 Ruusuvuori |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | 6-3 6-2 | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 10 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 17 | 29 | 22 | 94 | |
| pts | 95-77 | 52-35 | 84-84 | 65-59 | 296-255 | |
| Total points | 172 | 87 | 168 | 124 | 551 | |
| Winners | 39 | 20 | 53 | 33 | 145 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 38% | 63% | 51% | 49% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 8 | 5 | 14 | 9 | 36 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 53/74 | 25/46 | 67/99 | 38/64 | 183/283 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 54% | 68% | 59% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 39/53 | 20/25 | 53/67 | 33/38 | 145/183 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 80% | 79% | 87% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/21 | 16/21 | 14/32 | 15/26 | 59/100 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 76% | 44% | 58% | 59% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 10 | |
| Converted | 3/10 | 3/3 | 2/3 | 2/6 | 10/22 | |
| Converted % | 30% | 100% | 67% | 33% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 0 | 14 | 4 | 19 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0/0 | 13/14 | 4/4 | 17 | |
| Saved % | 0% | – | 93% | 100% | 48% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
| Thompson | ||||||
| R1 Mpetshi |
R2 Raonic |
1/4 Mannarino |
1/2 Hijikata |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-63 | 7-64 6-1 | 5-7 7-62 6-2 | 7-65 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 20 | 33 | 22 | 98 | |
| pts | 74-67 | 75-54 | 106-87 | 78-66 | 333-274 | |
| Total points | 141 | 129 | 193 | 144 | 607 | |
| Winners | 34 | 35 | 37 | 31 | 137 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 47% | 35% | 40% | 41% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 4 | 5 | 12 | 4 | 25 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 42/68 | 41/60 | 48/85 | 39/68 | 170/281 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 68% | 56% | 57% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 34/42 | 35/41 | 37/48 | 31/39 | 137/170 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 85% | 77% | 79% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/26 | 13/19 | 28/37 | 21/29 | 78/111 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 68% | 76% | 72% | 70% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7 | |
| Converted | 1/4 | 2/4 | 3/9 | 1/2 | 7/19 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 50% | 33% | 50% | 37% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 7 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2/2 | 0/2 | 1/1 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLWLLWWW
LWWWLLWLLW Tennis Scores in ‘s Hertogenbosch
- Wesley Koolhof/Neal SkupskiKoolhof/Neal Skupski – Gonzalo Escobar/Aleksandr NedovyesovEscobar/Aleksandr Nedovyesov (7-61 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (1-0) – H2H and prediction
