Bernard Tomic and Gustavo Heide will clash against each other in the quarter of the Palmas del Mar Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 4:30 pm on STADIUM COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Bernard Tomic who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Bernard Tomic is the pick to win this match.
Bernard Tomic -> 1.7
Gustavo Heide -> 2.09
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Bernard Tomic vs. Gustavo Heide
There is no head to head record between Bernard Tomic and Gustavo Heide since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Bernard Tomic
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 48-27 | 33-18 | 12-5 | 3-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 41-27 | 35-19 | 4-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 26-12 | 24-7 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2021 | 9-12 | 4-4 | 2-4 | 2-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2020 | 3-6 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 378, the Australian got to the quarter after beating Donald Young 6-4 6-2, Strong Kirchheimer 7-5 3-6 6-3, Alex Bolt 7-67 6-4 and Dane Sweeny 6-4 7-63.
In the 2nd round, Tomic had a good straight sets win against Sweeny (6-4 7-63). During the match, Tomic scored 70 points vs Sweeny’s 66. Bernard was extremely aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Regarding the service games, Tomic struck 4 aces and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults. Overall, Bernard Tomic was very effective on serve to win 75% (33/44) of his 1st serve and 58% (15/26) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Tomic broke Sweeny twice after converting 29% of his break points (2/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Tomic started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has dropped 1 set in this event to conquer 53% of the points he played.
Tomic has good win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 55% of his matches (210-173). 17-7 on hard in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Tomic has an overall 135-81 match record in the last years on hard.
Bernard’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Doha.
Bernard has an overall 19-10 win-loss record in 2023, 17-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Palmas del Mar Challenger
Bernard has never competed in this tournament before.
Gustavo Heide
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 30-23 | 0-1 | 30-20 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 33-22 | 9-5 | 24-17 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 27-13 | 3-2 | 24-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 31-14 | 4-5 | 27-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 423, the Brazilian reached the quarter after defeating Ji Sung Nam 6-4 6-4, Marius Copil 6-3 6-4, Tristan Schoolkate 7-63 6-3 and Alex Rybakov 6-3 6-4.
In the 2nd round, The Brazilian had a good straight sets win against Rybakov (6-3 6-4). During the match Heide scored 60 points vs Rybakov’s 44. Gustavo was quite aggressive to blast 24 winners.
About the serving games, Heide bagged 4 aces and he was extremely solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Gustavo Heide was exceptionally effective on serve to win 75% (24/32) of his 1st serve and 70% (14/20) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Heide broke Rybakov 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Heide started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t conceded yet a set in this event to conquer 56% of the points he played.
Heide has an overall 12-9 win-loss record in 2023, 6-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Tomic | Heide |
---|---|---|
Match played | 4 | 4 |
Tot Set | 9 | 8 |
Tot Games | 94 | 80 |
Pts | 304-269 | 255-198 |
Total Points | 573 | 453 |
Winners | 136 | 111 |
%Winners | 45% | 44% |
Both Tomic and Heide played 4 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Bernard Tomic surrendered 1 set while Gustavo Heide hasn’t lost a set so far. Tomic has played 1 set more than Heide (9 vs 8). Therefore, Tomic played 14 games more than Heide. Bernard scored 136 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, Gustavo blasted 111 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Tomic | Heide |
---|---|---|
Aces | 26 | 29 |
Avg per match | 6.5 | 7.3 |
1st in | 175/266 | 140/225 |
%1st in | 66% | 62% |
1st pts | 136/175 | 111/140 |
%1st pts | 78% | 79% |
2nd pts | 53/91 | 56/85 |
%2nd pts | 58% | 66% |
Tomic bagged 26 aces (6.5 per match). Heide fired 29 aces (7.3 per match). Tomic won 78% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points. On the other side, Heide won 79% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 66% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Tomic | Heide |
---|---|---|
Won | 11 | 10 |
Converted | 11/30 | 10/15 |
% Converted | 37% | 67% |
Conceded | 12 | 4 |
Saved | 7 | 2 |
% Saved | 58% | 50% |
Times Broken | 5 | 2 |
The Australian broke his opponents 11 times with a 37% conversion rate. The Australian dropped his serve 5 times and he saved 58% of the break points that he conceded. Gustavo broke his opponents 10 times with a 67% conversion rate. Gustavo conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
Tomic | ||||||
Q1 Young |
Q3 Kirchheimer |
R1 Bolt |
R2 Sweeny |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-2 | 7-5 3-6 6-3 | 7-67 6-4 | 6-4 7-63 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 9 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 30 | 23 | 23 | 94 | |
pts | 63-46 | 101-100 | 70-57 | 70-66 | 304-269 | |
Total points | 109 | 201 | 127 | 136 | 573 | |
Winners | 23 | 37 | 43 | 33 | 136 | |
%Winners | 37% | 37% | 61% | 47% | 45% | |
SERVE | ||||||
Aces | 9 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 26 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
1st in | 30/53 | 52/84 | 49/59 | 44/70 | 175/266 | |
% 1st in | 57% | 62% | 83% | 63% | 66% | |
1st pts | 23/30 | 37/52 | 43/49 | 33/44 | 136/175 | |
% 1st pts | 77% | 71% | 88% | 75% | 78% | |
2nd pts | 15/23 | 15/32 | 8/10 | 15/26 | 53/91 | |
% 2nd pts | 65% | 47% | 80% | 58% | 58% | |
Breaks | ||||||
Won | 3 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 11 | |
Converted | 3/4 | 5/17 | 1/2 | 2/7 | 11/30 | |
Converted % | 75% | 29% | 50% | 29% | 37% | |
Conceded | 0 | 8 | 0 | 4 | 12 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 4/8 | 0/0 | 3/4 | 7 | |
Saved % | – | 50% | – | 75% | 31% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
Heide | ||||||
Q1 Sung Nam |
Q3 Copil |
R1 Schoolkate |
R2 Rybakov |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-4 | 6-3 6-4 | 7-63 6-3 | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
Tot Games | 20 | 19 | 22 | 19 | 80 | |
pts | 61-49 | 58-44 | 76-61 | 60-44 | 255-198 | |
Total points | 110 | 102 | 137 | 104 | 453 | |
Winners | 26 | 25 | 36 | 24 | 111 | |
%Winners | 43% | 43% | 47% | 40% | 44% | |
SERVE | ||||||
Aces | 8 | 4 | 13 | 4 | 29 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 7 | |
1st in | 33/50 | 30/49 | 45/74 | 32/52 | 140/225 | |
% 1st in | 66% | 61% | 61% | 62% | 62% | |
1st pts | 26/33 | 25/30 | 36/45 | 24/32 | 111/140 | |
% 1st pts | 79% | 83% | 80% | 75% | 79% | |
2nd pts | 14/17 | 12/19 | 16/29 | 14/20 | 56/85 | |
% 2nd pts | 82% | 63% | 55% | 70% | 66% | |
Breaks | ||||||
Won | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 10 | |
Converted | 2/4 | 3/3 | 2/3 | 3/5 | 10/15 | |
Converted % | 50% | 100% | 67% | 60% | 67% | |
Conceded | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 0/0 | 2/3 | 0/1 | 2 | |
Saved % | – | – | 67% | 0% | 17% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Kei NishikoriNishikori – Adam WaltonWalton (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernard TomicTomic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Liam DraxlDraxl – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (0-0) – H2H and prediction