Matteo Gigante and Nerman Fatic will play each other in the 2nd round of the Perugia Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 12:00 pm on Grand Stand. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Nerman Fatic who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Nerman Fatic is the pick to win this match.
Nerman Fatic -> 1.87
Matteo Gigante -> 1.87
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Matteo Gigante vs. Nerman Fatic
There is no head to head record between Matteo Gigante and Nerman Fatic since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Matteo Gigante
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-13 | 18-3 | 9-7 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 32-29 | 10-5 | 19-18 | 1-5 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-20 | 9-1 | 27-15 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-15 | 2-2 | 16-7 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-9 | 1-1 | 2-5 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 251, the Italian got to the 2nd round after defeating Alessandro Giannessi 6-3 1-2 ret..
In the 1st round against Giannessi, Gigante had a free pass after Giannessi retired on a 6-3 1-2 . scoreline.
Gigante has a winning win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 58% of his matches (85-62). 5-8 on clay in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Gigante has an overall56-38 record in the last 5 years on clay.
His best result of the current year was winning the title the Tenerife 3 Challenger where he defeated Stefano Travaglia in the final 6-3 6-2.
The Italian has an overall 16-15 win-loss record in 2023, 5-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Perugia Challenger
Nerman Fatic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 11-16 | 3-3 | 7-12 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-28 | 0-1 | 35-25 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 34-27 | 0-1 | 31-19 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 37-26 | 1-1 | 30-22 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-3 | 0-0 | 9-1 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 271, Nerman reached the 2nd round after beating Pietro Genovese 6-2 6-1, Matteo Martineau 6-2 6-4 and Giulio Zeppieri 7-64 2-6 6-1.
In the 1st round, Fatic defeated Zeppieri (7-64 2-6 6-1). During the match Fatic scored 81 points vs Zeppieri’s 79. Fatic was pretty aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Talking about serving, Fatic blasted 8 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Nerman Fatic was pretty efficient on serve to win 72% (42/58) of his 1st serve and 59% (17/29) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The Bosnian broke Zeppieri twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Nerman has an overall 12-10 win-loss record in 2023, 12-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Perugia Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the quarter in 2021. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gigante | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 12 | 61 |
| Pts | 44-36 | 196-156 |
| Total Points | 80 | 352 |
| Winners | 17 | 94 |
| %Winners | 39% | 48% |
Gigante played 1 match while Fatic competed in 3 matches. Fatic started his run from the qualifications while Gigante had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Matteo Gigante surrendered 1 set, while Nerman Fatic conceded 1 set. Gigante has played 4 set(s) less than Fatic (3 vs 7). Therefore, Gigante played 49 games less than Fatic. The Italian scored 17 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Nerman managed to score 94 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gigante | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 19 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 6.3 |
| 1st in | 22/39 | 120/174 |
| %1st in | 56% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 17/22 | 94/120 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 9/17 | 32/54 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 59% |
Gigante blasted 1 ace . Fatic also bagged 19 aces (6.3 per match). Gigante won 77% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Fatic won 78% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gigante | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 10 |
| Converted | 2/8 | 10/18 |
| % Converted | 25% | 56% |
| Conceded | 5 | 6 |
| Saved | 4 | 4 |
| % Saved | 80% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
The Italian broke his opponent twice with a 25% conversion rate. Matteo lost his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. Nerman broke his opponents 10 times with a 56% conversion rate. The Bosnian conceded his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Gigante | |||
| R1 Giannessi |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 1-2 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 12 | 12 | |
| pts | 44-36 | 44-36 | |
| Total points | 80 | 80 | |
| Winners | 17 | 17 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 22/39 | 22/39 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 17/22 | 17/22 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/17 | 9/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/8 | 2/8 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Fatic | |||||
| Q1 Genovese |
Q3 Martineau |
R1 Zeppieri |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | 6-2 6-4 | 7-64 2-6 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 18 | 28 | 61 | |
| pts | 60-33 | 55-44 | 81-79 | 196-156 | |
| Total points | 93 | 99 | 160 | 352 | |
| Winners | 21 | 31 | 42 | 94 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 56% | 52% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 6 | 5 | 8 | 19 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 24/36 | 38/51 | 58/87 | 120/174 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 75% | 67% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 21/24 | 31/38 | 42/58 | 94/120 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 82% | 72% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/12 | 7/13 | 17/29 | 32/54 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 54% | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 3 | 2 | 10 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 3/6 | 2/5 | 10/18 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 50% | 40% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 1/1 | 3/5 | 4 | |
| Saved % | – | 100% | 60% | 160% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLWWLWL
WLLLWLWWWL Tennis Scores in Perugia Challenger
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Pol Martin TiffonMartin Tiffon (6-3 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio – Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas (5-7 7-64 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Edoardo LavagnoLavagno – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (6-72 7-5 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro CachinCachin – Andrea CollariniCollarini (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alvaro Lopez San MartinLopez San Martin – Fabian MarozsanMarozsan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Edoardo LavagnoLavagno – Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio (0-0) – H2H and prediction
