Caty McNally and Celine Naef will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Libema Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 4:30 pm on Court 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Caty McNally who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Caty McNally is the pick to win this match.
Caty McNally -> 1.27
Celine Naef -> 3.76
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Caty McNally vs. Celine Naef
There is no head to head record between Caty McNally and Celine Naef since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Caty McNally
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 16-13 | 5-6 | 9-4 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-23 | 7-9 | 1-6 | 17-5 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 22-20 | 10-11 | 4-5 | 3-1 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 13-14 | 9-9 | 1-3 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 62, Caty reached the 2nd round after beating Katie Volynets 6-2 6-1.
In the 1st round, McNally had a good straight sets win against Volynets (6-2 6-1). During the match, McNally scored 56 points vs Volynets’s 34. The American was very aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Regarding the service games, McNally scored 3 aces and she was very steady in conceding no double faults. Caty McNally was pretty effective on serve to win 75% (24/32) of her 1st serve and 63% (5/8) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. McNally broke Volynets 5 times after converting 83% of her break points (5/6).
McNally has a winning record in the last 8 years having won 58% of her matches (142-101). 1-0 on grass in 2023. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this event, McNally has a composed22-9 match record in the last 8 years on grass.
McNally’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in the Paris.
McNally has an overall 15-10 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in ‘s-Hertogenbosch
Celine Naef
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18-18 | 3-2 | 3-4 | 10-7 | 1-4 | 1-1 |
| 2023 | 41-19 | 5-3 | 12-6 | 19-8 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-6 | 7-1 | 2-3 | 14-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 202, the Swiss reached the 2nd round after defeating Venus Williams 3-6 7-63 6-2.
In the 1st round against Williams, Naef recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 7-63 6-2). During the match Naef scored 94 points vs Williams’s 89. Celine was quite aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about serving, Naef managed to score 5 aces and she committed only 3 double faults. Celine Naef lost the serve 3 times and she saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Naef put 63% of her first serves in, winning 69% (38/55) of the points behind her 1st serve and 58% (19/33) on the 2nd serve. Naef broke Williams 4 times after converting 40% of her break points (4/10).
Her best result of the season was winning the title the W25 Loughborough where she overcame Eliz Maloney in the final 6-0 6-4 and the W40 Porto where she defeated Lucrezia Stefanini in the final 6-2 6-4.
The Swiss has an overall 29-7 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in ‘s-Hertogenbosch
Naef has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | McNally | Naef |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 30 |
| Pts | 56-34 | 94-89 |
| Total Points | 90 | 183 |
| Winners | 24 | 38 |
| %Winners | 43% | 40% |
Both McNally and Naef played 1 match. At the moment, Celine Naef dropped 1 set while Caty McNally hasn’t lost a set so far. McNally has played 1 set(s) less than Naef (2 vs 3). Therefore, McNally played 15 games less than Naef. The American scored 24 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Naef struck 38 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | McNally | Naef |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 5 |
| 1st in | 32/40 | 55/88 |
| %1st in | 80% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 24/32 | 38/55 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 5/8 | 19/33 |
| %2nd pts | 63% | 58% |
McNally fired 3 aces . Naef recorded 5 aces . McNally won 75% points on her first serve. She was rock solid on her second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Naef won 69% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | McNally | Naef |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 4 |
| Converted | 5/6 | 4/10 |
| % Converted | 83% | 40% |
| Conceded | 0 | 6 |
| Saved | 0 | 3 |
| % Saved | 0% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
The American broke her opponent 5 times with a 83% conversion rate. McNally pretty effective on her serve as she has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points. Naef broke her opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. Celine conceded her serve 3 times and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded.
| McNally | |||
| R1 Volynets |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 56-34 | 56-34 | |
| Total points | 90 | 90 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 32/40 | 32/40 | |
| % 1st in | 80% | 80% | |
| 1st pts | 24/32 | 24/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/6 | 5/6 | |
| Converted % | 83% | 83% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Naef | |||
| R1 Williams |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 7-63 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 94-89 | 94-89 | |
| Total points | 183 | 183 | |
| Winners | 38 | 38 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 55/88 | 55/88 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 38/55 | 38/55 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/33 | 19/33 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 3/6 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLL
LLLWLLLLLW Tennis Scores in ‘s Hertogenbosch
- Liudmila SamsonovaSamsonova – Polina KudermetovaKudermetova (6-4 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Veronika KudermetovaKudermetova – Carol ZhaoZhao (6-1 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Ashlyn KruegerKrueger – Victoria AzarenkaAzarenka (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich – Greetje MinnenMinnen (6-2 4-6 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Elmar EjupovicEjupovic – Luka PavlovicPavlovic (3-6 6-3 7-60) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Corentin DenollyDenolly – Ivan SabanovSabanov (7-63 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Samuel BensoussanBensoussan – Rrezart CunguCungu (7-5 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Domagoj BiljeskoBiljesko – Milan DrinicDrinic (6-0 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Pavle DaljevDaljev (6-1 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Daniel AppelgrenAppelgren – Stefan MicovMicov (7-5 6-75 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Viktoria KuzmovaKuzmova – Bianca Vanessa AndreescuVanessa Andreescu (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Sachia VickeryVickery – Emina BektasBektas (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kimberly BirrellBirrell – Ekaterina AlexandrovaAlexandrova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich – Ludmilla SamsonovaSamsonova (0-1) – H2H and prediction
