
Yibing Wu and Marton Fucsovics will face off in the 2nd round of the Boss Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 11:00 am on Center Court. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Marton Fucsovics who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Marton Fucsovics is the pick to win this match.
Marton Fucsovics -> 1.38
Yibing Wu -> 3.04
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Yibing Wu vs. Marton Fucsovics
There is no head to head record between Yibing Wu and Marton Fucsovics since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Yibing Wu
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 9-5 | 7-4 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 18-17 | 5-7 | 3-5 | 9-1 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
2022 | 40-7 | 20-5 | 10-2 | 10-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 64, the Chinese got to the 2nd round after defeating Nick Kyrgios 7-5 6-3.
In the 1st round, Wu had a good straight sets win against Kyrgios (7-5 6-3). During the match, Wu scored 70 points vs Kyrgios’s 56. Wu was pretty aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about the service games, Wu scored 5 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Yibing Wu was pretty effective on serve to win 77% (33/43) of his 1st serve and 64% (16/25) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Yibing broke Kyrgios twice after converting 67% of his break points (2/3).
Wu has a solid record in the last 6 years having won 65% of his matches (109-59). 1-0 on grass in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Wu has a composed1-0 match record in the last 6 years on grass.
His best result of the current season was conquering the title in Dallas where he defeated John Isner in the final 6-7(4) 7-6(3) 7-6(12).
The Chinese has an aggregate 16-10 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Stuttgart
Wu has never competed in this tournament before.
Marton Fucsovics
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 13-4 | 10-3 | 0-0 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 22-19 | 6-8 | 9-5 | 7-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 35-25 | 17-11 | 6-6 | 5-6 | 7-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 30-26 | 7-12 | 6-5 | 15-6 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
2021 | 28-24 | 10-9 | 3-5 | 10-7 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 86, Fucsovics got to the 2nd round after beating Louis Wessels 6-3 6-1, Altug Celikbilek 6-4 6-4 and Denis Shapovalov 3-6 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round against Shapovalov, Marton recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-3 6-4). During the match Fucsovics scored 86 points vs Shapovalov’s 73. The Hungarian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 38 winners.
About the serving games, Fucsovics recorded 7 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Marton Fucsovics was exceptionally effective on serve to win 78% (38/49) of his 1st serve and 60% (15/25) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Fucsovics broke Shapovalov 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
His best result of the year was conquering the title the Canberra Challenger where he defeated Leandro Riedi in the final 7-5 6-4.
The Hungarian has an aggregate 21-14 win-loss record in 2023, 3-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Stuttgart
Previously, his best result was reaching the quarter in 2019 and 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Wu | Fucsovics |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 3 |
Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
Tot Games | 21 | 64 |
Pts | 70-56 | 207-160 |
Total Points | 126 | 367 |
Winners | 33 | 97 |
%Winners | 47% | 47% |
Wu played 1 match while Fucsovics competed in 3 matches. Fucsovics started his run from the qualifications while Wu had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Marton Fucsovics surrendered 1 set while Yibing Wu hasn’t lost a set so far. Wu has played 5 set(s) less than Fucsovics (2 vs 7). Therefore, Wu played 43 games less than Fucsovics. Yibing scored 33 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, Marton struck 97 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Wu | Fucsovics |
---|---|---|
Aces | 5 | 15 |
Avg per match | 5 | 5 |
1st in | 43/68 | 119/180 |
%1st in | 63% | 66% |
1st pts | 33/43 | 97/119 |
%1st pts | 77% | 82% |
2nd pts | 16/25 | 32/61 |
%2nd pts | 64% | 52% |
Wu bagged 5 aces . Fucsovics struck 15 aces (5 per match). Wu won 77% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 64% of the points. On the other side, Fucsovics won 82% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Wu | Fucsovics |
---|---|---|
Won | 2 | 10 |
Converted | 2/3 | 10/19 |
% Converted | 67% | 53% |
Conceded | 2 | 6 |
Saved | 2 | 3 |
% Saved | 100% | 50% |
Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
Yibing broke his opponent twice with a 67% conversion rate. Wu very solid his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 2 break points. The Hungarian broke his opponents 10 times with a 53% conversion rate. Marton conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
Wu | |||
R1 Kyrgios |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-5 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
pts | 70-56 | 70-56 | |
Total points | 126 | 126 | |
Winners | 33 | 33 | |
%Winners | 47% | 47% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 5 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 43/68 | 43/68 | |
% 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
1st pts | 33/43 | 33/43 | |
% 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
2nd pts | 16/25 | 16/25 | |
% 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 2 | 2 | |
Converted | 2/3 | 2/3 | |
Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Fucsovics | |||||
Q1 Wessels |
Q3 Celikbilek |
R1 Shapovalov |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-1 | 6-4 6-4 | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 20 | 28 | 64 | |
pts | 62-41 | 59-46 | 86-73 | 207-160 | |
Total points | 103 | 105 | 159 | 367 | |
Winners | 30 | 29 | 38 | 97 | |
%Winners | 48% | 49% | 44% | 47% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 5 | 3 | 7 | 15 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 4 | 3 | 9 | |
1st in | 33/50 | 37/56 | 49/74 | 119/180 | |
% 1st in | 66% | 66% | 66% | 66% | |
1st pts | 30/33 | 29/37 | 38/49 | 97/119 | |
% 1st pts | 91% | 78% | 78% | 82% | |
2nd pts | 7/17 | 10/19 | 15/25 | 32/61 | |
% 2nd pts | 41% | 53% | 60% | 52% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 4 | 3 | 3 | 10 | |
Converted | 4/7 | 3/3 | 3/9 | 10/19 | |
Converted % | 57% | 100% | 33% | 53% | |
Conceded | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | |
Saved | 3/3 | 0/1 | 0/2 | 3 | |
Saved % | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Head 2 Head



Tennis Scores in Stuttgart
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Jiri LeheckaLehecka (7-62 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Hubert HurkaczHurkacz – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (4-6 7-65 7-65) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Lorenzo SonegoSonego (7-65 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Lorenzo MusettiMusetti – Gregoire BarrereBarrere (6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jan-Lennard StruffStruff – Tommy PaulPaul (0-4) – H2H and prediction
- Aslan KaratsevKaratsev – Taylor Harry FritzHarry Fritz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hubert HurkaczHurkacz – Christopher O ConnellO Connell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas – Richard GasquetGasquet (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yibing WuWu – Marton FucsovicsFucsovics (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo MusettiMusetti – Frances TiafoeTiafoe (3-2) – H2H and prediction