![Prediction And Head To Head Colin Sinclair Vs. Liam Draxl 5hrhosh4w4 Prediction and head to head Colin Sinclair vs. Liam Draxl](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Colin-Sinclair-vs.-Liam-Draxl-5HrHOSH4W4.jpg)
Colin Sinclair and Liam Draxl will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Palmas del Mar Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 11:00 am on STADIUM COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Liam Draxl who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Liam Draxl is the pick to win this match.
Liam Draxl -> 1.83
Colin Sinclair -> 1.83
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Colin Sinclair vs. Liam Draxl
There is no head to head record between Colin Sinclair and Liam Draxl since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Colin Sinclair
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 3-5 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 39-32 | 31-25 | 8-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 31-22 | 22-14 | 7-5 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 39-21 | 22-8 | 14-9 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 9-12 | 3-7 | 6-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 392 (career-high), Colin reached the 2nd round after defeating Henrik Wiersholm 6-2 6-1, Kaito Uesugi 6-1 7-64 and Alexander Bravo 6-2 6-0.
In the 1st round, Sinclair had a good straight sets win against Bravo (6-2 6-0). During the match, Sinclair scored 63 points vs Bravo’s 39. The Australian was extremely aggressive to blast 20 winners.
Regarding the service games, Sinclair managed to score 8 aces and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults. Colin Sinclair lost the serve once. Furthermore, Sinclair put 68% of his first serves in, winning 80% (20/25) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (5/12) on the 2nd serve. Colin broke Bravo 6 times after converting 32% of his break points (6/19).
Sinclair has a solid win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 62% of his matches (198-123). 15-7 on hard in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Sinclair has a composed105-63 win-loss record in the last 7 years on hard.
The Australian’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Rancho Santa Fe.
The Australian has an aggregate 23-13 win-loss record in 2023, 15-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Palmas del Mar Challenger
Sinclair has never competed in this tournament before.
Liam Draxl
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 15-11 | 6-3 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 36-9 | 23-5 | 0-0 | 13-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 26-16 | 16-10 | 3-1 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 29-14 | 16-9 | 12-3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 3-1 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 617, Liam reached the 2nd round after defeating Tung-Lin Wu 3-6 7-5 7-64.
In the 1st round against Wu, Draxl recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 7-5 7-64).During the match Draxl scored less points (6) than Wu. In fact, the world no. 392 won 110 points vs Wu’s. That means that Draxl was more focused during the important points. Draxl was quite aggressive to blast 47 winners.
About the serving games, Draxl recorded 8 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Liam Draxl lost the serve 4 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Draxl put 65% of his first serves in, winning 71% (47/66) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (15/35) on the 2nd serve. Draxl broke Wu 4 times after converting 31% of his break points (4/13).
Draxl has an aggregate 1-0 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Sinclair | Draxl |
---|---|---|
Match played | 3 | 1 |
Tot Set | 6 | 3 |
Tot Games | 49 | 34 |
Pts | 186-116 | 110-116 |
Total Points | 302 | 226 |
Winners | 69 | 47 |
%Winners | 37% | 43% |
Sinclair played 3 matches while Draxl competed in 1 match. Sinclair started his run from the qualifications while Draxl had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Liam Draxl conceded 1 set while Colin Sinclair hasn’t lost a set so far. Sinclair has played 3 sets more than Draxl (6 vs 3). Therefore, Sinclair played 15 games more than Draxl. The Australian scored 69 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, The Canadian fired 47 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Sinclair | Draxl |
---|---|---|
Aces | 16 | 8 |
Avg per match | 5.3 | 8 |
1st in | 93/147 | 66/101 |
%1st in | 63% | 65% |
1st pts | 69/93 | 47/66 |
%1st pts | 74% | 71% |
2nd pts | 31/54 | 15/35 |
%2nd pts | 57% | 43% |
Sinclair bagged 16 aces (5.3 per match). Draxl managed to score 8 aces . Sinclair won 74% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Draxl won 71% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 43% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Sinclair | Draxl |
---|---|---|
Won | 15 | 4 |
Converted | 15/30 | 4/13 |
% Converted | 50% | 31% |
Conceded | 7 | 8 |
Saved | 3 | 4 |
% Saved | 43% | 50% |
Times Broken | 4 | 4 |
The Australian broke his opponents 15 times with a 50% conversion rate. Colin conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 43% of the break points that he conceded. Draxl broke his opponent 4 times with a 31% conversion rate. Draxl conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
Sinclair | |||||
Q1 Wiersholm |
Q3 Uesugi |
R1 Bravo |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-1 | 6-1 7-64 | 6-2 6-0 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
Tot Games | 15 | 20 | 14 | 49 | |
pts | 56-28 | 67-49 | 63-39 | 186-116 | |
Total points | 84 | 116 | 102 | 302 | |
Winners | 25 | 24 | 20 | 69 | |
%Winners | 45% | 36% | 32% | 37% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 5 | 3 | 8 | 16 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
1st in | 35/47 | 33/63 | 25/37 | 93/147 | |
% 1st in | 74% | 52% | 68% | 63% | |
1st pts | 25/35 | 24/33 | 20/25 | 69/93 | |
% 1st pts | 71% | 73% | 80% | 74% | |
2nd pts | 6/12 | 20/30 | 5/12 | 31/54 | |
% 2nd pts | 50% | 67% | 42% | 57% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 6 | 3 | 6 | 15 | |
Converted | 6/7 | 3/4 | 6/19 | 15/30 | |
Converted % | 86% | 75% | 32% | 50% | |
Conceded | 5 | 1 | 1 | 7 | |
Saved | 3/5 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 3 | |
Saved % | 60% | 0% | 0% | 20% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
Draxl | |||||
R1 Wu |
Total | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 3-6 7-5 7-64 | ||||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |||
Tot Games | 34 | 34 | |||
pts | 110-116 | 110-116 | |||
Total points | 226 | 226 | |||
Winners | 47 | 47 | |||
%Winners | 43% | 43% | |||
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 8 | 8 | |||
Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |||
1st in | 66/101 | 66/101 | |||
% 1st in | 65% | 65% | |||
1st pts | 47/66 | 47/66 | |||
% 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |||
2nd pts | 15/35 | 15/35 | |||
% 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |||
Breaks | |||||
Won | 4 | 4 | |||
Converted | 4/13 | 4/13 | |||
Converted % | 31% | 31% | |||
Conceded | 8 | 8 | |||
Saved | 4/8 | 4 | |||
Saved % | 50% | 17% | |||
Times Broken | 4 | 4 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Palmas Del Mar Challenger
- Jose StathamStatham – Nick ChappellChappell (6-1 6-74 7-5) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Peter GojowczykGojowczyk (4-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Bernard TomicTomic – Alex BoltBolt (7-67 6-4) – See score progression
- Kei NishikoriNishikori – Christian LangmoLangmo (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Gustavo HeideHeide – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (7-63 6-3) – See score progression
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran (7-64 6-3) – See score progression
- Adam WaltonWalton – Marc PolmansPolmans (7-61 6-1) – See score progression
- Colin SinclairSinclair – Alexander BravoBravo (6-2 6-0) – See score progression
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Liam DraxlDraxl – Tung-Lin WuWu (3-6 7-5 7-64) – See score progression
- Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (5-7 6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Kei NishikoriNishikori – Christian LangmoLangmo (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Jose StathamStatham – Nick ChappellChappell (6-1 6-7(4) 7-5) – See score progression
- Bernard TomicTomic – Alex BoltBolt (7-6(7) 6-4) – See score progression
- Gustavo HeideHeide – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (7-6(3) 6-3) – See score progression
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran (7-6(4) 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jose StathamStatham – Adam WaltonWalton (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Steven DiezDiez – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Marius CopilCopil (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Kei NishikoriNishikori (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan ZhuZhu – Viktor DurasovicDurasovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Liam DraxlDraxl – Colin SinclairSinclair (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dane SweenySweeny – Skander MansouriMansouri (0-1) – H2H and prediction