Renzo Olivo and Stefano Napolitano will play each other in the qualifications of the Perugia Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 11:30 am on GRAND STAND. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Stefano Napolitano who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Stefano Napolitano is the pick to win this match.
Stefano Napolitano -> 1.615
Renzo Olivo -> 2.2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Renzo Olivo vs. Stefano Napolitano
There is no head to head record between Renzo Olivo and Stefano Napolitano since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Renzo Olivo
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13-18 | 0-0 | 13-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-34 | 2-6 | 27-28 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 34-31 | 3-6 | 29-24 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-32 | 4-6 | 19-25 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 19-17 | 2-2 | 17-14 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 261, the Argentine got to the qualifications after defeating Robert Strombachs 6-4 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Argentine had a good straight sets win against Strombachs (6-4 6-1). During the match, Olivo scored 55 points vs Strombachs’s 33. The Argentine was extremely aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Regarding the service games, Olivo bagged 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Renzo Olivo was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 91% (21/23) of his 1st serve and 73% (11/15) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Olivo broke Strombachs 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Olivo has a negative record in the last 10 years having won only 49% of his matches (256-269). 11-13 on clay in 2023. . Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Olivo has an overall 216-209 record in the last years on clay.
Olivo’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in the Piracicaba Challenger.
Renzo has a compiled 12-17 win-loss record in 2023, 11-13 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Perugia Challenger
Stefano Napolitano
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23-11 | 9-3 | 11-6 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-23 | 9-6 | 38-13 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 25-24 | 1-1 | 20-15 | 4-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 2-17 | 1-2 | 1-9 | 0-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 5-8 | 0-1 | 1-4 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 419, Napolitano got to the qualifications after beating Remy Bertola 4-6 7-64 6-4.
In the qualifications against Bertola, The Italian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-64 6-4). During the match Napolitano scored 100 points vs Bertola’s 88. The Italian was quite aggressive to blast 46 winners.
About the serving games, Napolitano made 6 aces and he was quite steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Stefano Napolitano was very efficient on serve to win 81% (46/57) of his 1st serve and 62% (18/29) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 3 times. Napolitano broke Bertola 3 times after converting 25% of his break points (3/12).
Stefano’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Frascati.
The Italian has a compiled 23-11 win-loss record in 2023, 17-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Olivo | Napolitano |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 33 |
| Pts | 55-33 | 100-88 |
| Total Points | 88 | 188 |
| Winners | 21 | 46 |
| %Winners | 38% | 46% |
Both Olivo and Napolitano played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Stefano Napolitano lost 1 set while Renzo Olivo hasn’t lost a set so far. Olivo has played 1 set(s) less than Napolitano (2 vs 3). Therefore, Olivo played 16 games less than Napolitano. Olivo scored 21 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Napolitano bagged 46 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Olivo | Napolitano |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 6 |
| 1st in | 23/38 | 57/86 |
| %1st in | 61% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 21/23 | 46/57 |
| %1st pts | 91% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 11/15 | 18/29 |
| %2nd pts | 73% | 62% |
Olivo managed to score 2 aces . Napolitano managed to score 6 aces . Olivo won 91% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 73% of the points. On the other side, Napolitano won 81% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Olivo | Napolitano |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 3 |
| Converted | 4/6 | 3/12 |
| % Converted | 67% | 25% |
| Conceded | 0 | 6 |
| Saved | 0 | 3 |
| % Saved | 0% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
Renzo broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. Renzo extremely effective on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 0 break points. Stefano broke his opponent 3 times with a 25% conversion rate. Napolitano conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Olivo | |||
| Q1 Strombachs |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 55-33 | 55-33 | |
| Total points | 88 | 88 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 23/38 | 23/38 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 21/23 | 21/23 | |
| % 1st pts | 91% | 91% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/15 | 11/15 | |
| % 2nd pts | 73% | 73% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Napolitano | |||
| Q1 Bertola |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 7-64 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 33 | 33 | |
| pts | 100-88 | 100-88 | |
| Total points | 188 | 188 | |
| Winners | 46 | 46 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 57/86 | 57/86 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 46/57 | 46/57 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/29 | 18/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/12 | 3/12 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 3/6 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLLLLWLL
LWLWWLWLWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Renzo OlivoOlivo – Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico GaioGaio – Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Fabian MarozsanMarozsan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla – Francesco FortiForti (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dominic ThiemThiem – Flavio CobolliCobolli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nerman FaticFatic – Matteo MartineauMartineau (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro CachinCachin – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexandre MullerMuller – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Dmitry PopkoPopko (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Francesco PassaroPassaro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alvaro Lopez San MartinLopez San Martin – Alexander WeisWeis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pol Martin TiffonMartin Tiffon – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel – Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio (0-0) – H2H and prediction
