John Hallquist Lithen and Nick Chappell will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Palmas del Mar Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 11:00 am on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Nick Chappell who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Nick Chappell is the pick to win this match.
Nick Chappell -> 1.18
John Hallquist Lithen -> 4.45
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head John Hallquist Lithen vs. Nick Chappell
There is no head to head record between John Hallquist Lithen and Nick Chappell since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
John Hallquist Lithen
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13-3 | 0-0 | 13-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 9-6 | 3-2 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, John reached the qualifications after defeating Mateus Alves 0-6 6-3 4-1 ret..
In the qualifications against Alves, the Swede had a free pass after Alves retired on a 0-6 6-3 4-1 . scoreline.
Hallquist Lithen has won exactly 50% of his matches (6-6) in the last 3 years. 1-0 on hard in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Hallquist Lithen has a compiled1-0 win-loss record in the last 3 years on hard.
The Swede has an aggregate 1-0 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Palmas del Mar Challenger
Hallquist Lithen has never competed in this tournament before.
Nick Chappell
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 12-18 | 9-11 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 44-36 | 38-25 | 2-4 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-33 | 14-16 | 7-8 | 2-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-35 | 14-16 | 4-12 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 22-16 | 19-11 | 0-0 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 381, Nick got to the qualifications after beating Tristan Boyer 7-63 6-2.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Boyer (7-63 6-2). During the match Chappell scored 72 points vs Boyer’s 55. Chappell was very aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about serving, Chappell recorded 6 aces and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Nick Chappell conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 67% of his first serves in, win 67% (30/45) of the points behind his 1st serve and 82% (18/22) on the 2nd serve. Chappell broke Boyer twice after converting 67% of his break points (2/3).
Chappell has an aggregate 16-14 win-loss record in 2023, 12-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Hallquist Lithen | Chappell |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 21 |
| Pts | 55-57 | 72-55 |
| Total Points | 112 | 127 |
| Winners | 22 | 30 |
| %Winners | 40% | 42% |
Both Hallquist Lithen and Chappell played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, John Hallquist Lithen conceded 1 set while Nick Chappell hasn’t conceded a set so far. Hallquist Lithen has played 2 sets more than Chappell (4 vs 2). However, it’s interesting to notice that Hallquist Lithen played 1 game less than Chappell. John scored 22 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, The American blasted 30 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Hallquist Lithen | Chappell |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 6 |
| 1st in | 32/58 | 45/67 |
| %1st in | 55% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 22/32 | 30/45 |
| %1st pts | 69% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 11/26 | 18/22 |
| %2nd pts | 42% | 82% |
Hallquist Lithen recorded 2 aces . Chappell fired 6 aces . Hallquist Lithen won 69% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 42% of the points. On the other side, Chappell won 67% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 82% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Hallquist Lithen | Chappell |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 2 |
| Converted | 4/6 | 2/3 |
| % Converted | 67% | 67% |
| Conceded | 12 | 0 |
| Saved | 8 | 0 |
| % Saved | 67% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 0 |
The Swede broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. Hallquist Lithen conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Nick broke his opponent twice with a 67% conversion rate. Nick was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Hallquist Lithen | |||
| Q1 Alves |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 0-6 6-3 4-1 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 55-57 | 55-57 | |
| Total points | 112 | 112 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 32/58 | 32/58 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 22/32 | 22/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/26 | 11/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 42% | 42% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 12 | 12 | |
| Saved | 8/12 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Chappell | |||
| Q1 Boyer |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 72-55 | 72-55 | |
| Total points | 127 | 127 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 45/67 | 45/67 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 30/45 | 30/45 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/22 | 18/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 82% | 82% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/3 | 2/3 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWWWWWL
LLLLWWLWLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marius CopilCopil – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernard TomicTomic – Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Daniel MasurMasur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Peter GojowczykGojowczyk (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick ChappellChappell – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Liam DraxlDraxl (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kaito UesugiUesugi – Colin SinclairSinclair (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian LangmoLangmo – Kei NishikoriNishikori (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan ZhuZhu – Alex RybakovRybakov (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adam WaltonWalton – Marc PolmansPolmans (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dane SweenySweeny – Skander MansouriMansouri (0-1) – H2H and prediction
