Nerman Fatic and Matteo Martineau will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Perugia Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT 3. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Nerman Fatic who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Nerman Fatic is the pick to win this match.
Nerman Fatic -> 1.58
Matteo Martineau -> 2.27
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Nerman Fatic vs. Matteo Martineau
This will be the 2nd time that Nerman Fatic and Matteo Martineau fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Martineau (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on clay.
The last time that they squared off, Martineau won 6-7(5) 1-0 ret. in the quarter in M15 Piombino back in 2019.
Nerman Fatic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13-17 | 3-3 | 9-13 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-28 | 0-1 | 35-25 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 34-27 | 0-1 | 31-19 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 37-26 | 1-1 | 30-22 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-3 | 0-0 | 9-1 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 278, the Bosnian reached the qualifications after beating Pietro Genovese 6-2 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Bosnian had a good straight sets win against Genovese (6-2 6-1). During the match, Fatic scored 60 points vs Genovese’s 33. The Bosnian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Regarding the service games, Fatic recorded 6 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Nerman Fatic was very effective on serve to win 88% (21/24) of his 1st serve and 67% (8/12) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Fatic broke Genovese 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Fatic has a winning match record in the last 9 years having won 59% of his matches (286-200). 10-10 on clay in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Fatic has a composed236-151 win-loss record in the last 9 years on clay.
The Bosnian has an overall 10-10 win-loss record in 2023, 10-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Perugia Challenger
Matteo Martineau
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 22-20 | 0-1 | 7-10 | 12-6 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 50-36 | 0-1 | 23-17 | 18-15 | 0-0 | 9-3 |
| 2022 | 36-31 | 2-1 | 23-20 | 11-9 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 41-26 | 4-4 | 27-15 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 3-1 |
| 2020 | 19-14 | 4-3 | 7-6 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 6-3 |
Ranked no. 364, the French player got to the qualifications after defeating Lorenzo Rottoli 6-2 7-63.
In the qualifications, The French player had a good straight sets win against Rottoli (6-2 7-63). During the match Martineau scored 86 points vs Rottoli’s 66. Matteo was quite aggressive to blast 35 winners.
About the serving games, Martineau fired 6 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Matteo Martineau lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Martineau put 64% of his first serves in, winning 73% (35/48) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (13/27) on the 2nd serve. The French player broke Rottoli 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Martineau’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M25 Nussloch.
The French player has an overall 21-17 win-loss record in 2023, 7-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Perugia Challenger
The French player has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Fatic | Martineau |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 21 |
| Pts | 60-33 | 86-66 |
| Total Points | 93 | 152 |
| Winners | 21 | 35 |
| %Winners | 35% | 41% |
Both Fatic and Martineau played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Fatic and Martineau have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Fatic played 6 games less than Martineau. Fatic scored 21 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, The French player blasted 35 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Fatic | Martineau |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 6 |
| 1st in | 24/36 | 48/75 |
| %1st in | 67% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 21/24 | 35/48 |
| %1st pts | 88% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 8/12 | 13/27 |
| %2nd pts | 67% | 48% |
Fatic bagged 6 aces . Martineau bagged 6 aces . Fatic won 88% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 67% of the points. On the other side, Martineau won 73% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Fatic | Martineau |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 4 |
| Converted | 5/7 | 4/10 |
| % Converted | 71% | 40% |
| Conceded | 0 | 5 |
| Saved | 0 | 3 |
| % Saved | 0% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
The Bosnian broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. The Bosnian had a solid display on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 0 break points. The French player broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. Matteo conceded his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Fatic | |||
| Q1 Genovese |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 60-33 | 60-33 | |
| Total points | 93 | 93 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 24/36 | 24/36 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 21/24 | 21/24 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 88% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/12 | 8/12 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Martineau | |||
| Q1 Rottoli |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 86-66 | 86-66 | |
| Total points | 152 | 152 | |
| Winners | 35 | 35 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 48/75 | 48/75 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 35/48 | 35/48 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/27 | 13/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLLLWLW
LLWLWWLLLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Federico GaioGaio – Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Fabian MarozsanMarozsan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla – Francesco FortiForti (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano – Remy BertolaBertola (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dominic ThiemThiem – Flavio CobolliCobolli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nerman FaticFatic – Matteo MartineauMartineau (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro CachinCachin – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexandre MullerMuller – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Dmitry PopkoPopko (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Francesco PassaroPassaro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alvaro Lopez San MartinLopez San Martin – Alexander WeisWeis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pol Martin TiffonMartin Tiffon – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel – Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio (0-0) – H2H and prediction
