Emiliana Arango and Emily Appleton will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Rothesay Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 1:00 pm on Court 3. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Emiliana Arango who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Emiliana Arango is the pick to win this match.
Emiliana Arango -> 1.58
Emily Appleton -> 2.27
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Emiliana Arango vs. Emily Appleton
There is no head to head record between Emiliana Arango and Emily Appleton since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Emiliana Arango
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 11-19 | 4-6 | 5-7 | 2-3 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 48-27 | 10-8 | 28-13 | 2-2 | 8-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 12-20 | 7-7 | 5-12 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 38-20 | 19-9 | 19-10 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-6 | 8-5 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 208, Emiliana reached the qualifications after defeating Dayana Yastremska 6-2 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Colombian had a good straight sets win against Yastremska (6-2 6-4). During the match, Arango scored 65 points vs Yastremska’s 49. Emiliana was pretty aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Regarding the service games, Arango scored just 1 ace during the match and she committed only 4 double faults. Emiliana Arango lost the serve twice and she saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Arango put 62% of her first serves in, winning 66% (25/38) of the points behind her 1st serve and 57% (13/23) on the 2nd serve. The Colombian broke Yastremska 5 times after converting 56% of her break points (5/9).
Arango has a solid win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 60% of her matches (165-111). 2-1 on grass in 2023. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Arango has a compiled2-2 record in the last 8 years on grass.
The Colombian’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the W25 Mosquera.
Emiliana has an aggregate 29-15 win-loss record in 2023, 2-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Nottingham
Emiliana has never competed in this tournament before.
Emily Appleton
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24-18 | 0-0 | 6-5 | 11-8 | 6-4 | 1-1 |
| 2023 | 29-31 | 6-3 | 9-14 | 9-9 | 3-4 | 2-1 |
| 2022 | 20-22 | 4-4 | 3-9 | 13-7 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 6-11 | 6-8 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-8 | 2-3 | 4-4 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 427, Emily reached the qualifications after beating Katrina Scott 4-6 7-64 6-3.
In the qualifications against Scott, Emily recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-64 6-3). During the match Appleton scored 113 points vs Scott’s 104. Appleton was quite aggressive to blast 52 winners.
About the serving games, Appleton fired 12 aces and she committed only 9 double faults. Overall, Emily Appleton was very effective on serve to win 72% (52/72) of her 1st serve and 51% (22/43) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve 3 times. The Brit broke Scott 3 times after converting 43% of her break points (3/7).
The Brit’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in the W25 Nottingham.
The Brit has an aggregate 15-17 win-loss record in 2023, 2-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Arango | Appleton |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 32 |
| Pts | 65-49 | 113-104 |
| Total Points | 114 | 217 |
| Winners | 25 | 52 |
| %Winners | 38% | 46% |
Both Arango and Appleton played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Emily Appleton conceded 1 set while Emiliana Arango hasn’t conceded a set so far. Arango has played 1 set(s) less than Appleton (2 vs 3). Therefore, Arango played 14 games less than Appleton. The Colombian scored 25 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, The Brit made 52 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Arango | Appleton |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 12 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 12 |
| 1st in | 38/61 | 72/115 |
| %1st in | 62% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 25/38 | 52/72 |
| %1st pts | 66% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 13/23 | 22/43 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 51% |
Arango blasted 1 ace . Appleton also recorded 12 aces . Arango won 66% points on her first serve. She pretty solid on her second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Appleton won 72% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Arango | Appleton |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 3 |
| Converted | 5/9 | 3/7 |
| % Converted | 56% | 43% |
| Conceded | 8 | 7 |
| Saved | 6 | 4 |
| % Saved | 75% | 57% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 |
Arango broke her opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Arango lost her serve twice and she saved 75% of the break points that she conceded. The Brit broke her opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. Appleton conceded her serve 3 times and she saved 57% of the break points that she conceded.
| Arango | |||
| Q1 Yastremska |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 65-49 | 65-49 | |
| Total points | 114 | 114 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 38/61 | 38/61 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 25/38 | 25/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/23 | 13/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 6/8 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Appleton | |||
| Q1 Scott |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 7-64 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
| pts | 113-104 | 113-104 | |
| Total points | 217 | 217 | |
| Winners | 52 | 52 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 12 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 9 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 72/115 | 72/115 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 52/72 | 52/72 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/43 | 22/43 | |
| % 2nd pts | 51% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 4/7 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 57% | 57% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLLWLLWL
LLLWWLWWWW Tennis Scores in Nottingham
- Yan BondarevskiyBondarevskiy – Nicolas Vicente Del ValleVicente Del Valle (6-1 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Francois-Arthur VibertVibert – Filippo StramigioliStramigioli (6-1 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Elizabeth MandlikMandlik – Daria SnigurSnigur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arina RodionovaRodionova – Olivia GadeckiGadecki (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Harriet DartDart – Eden SilvaSilva (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Emiliana ArangoArango – Emily AppletonAppleton (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maria SakkariSakkari – Xiyu WangWang (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Katie SwanSwan – Alize CornetCornet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Madison BrengleBrengle – Camila GiorgiGiorgi (3-3) – H2H and prediction
- Tereza MartincovaMartincova – Jodie Anna BurrageAnna Burrage (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alycia ParksParks – Lin ZhuZhu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Shuai ZhangZhang – Tatjana MariaMaria (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jil TeichmannTeichmann – Viktorija GolubicGolubic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Cristina BucsaBucsa – Donna VekicVekic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anhelina KalininaKalinina – Nuria Parrizas-DiazParrizas-Diaz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lesya TsurenkoTsurenko – Beatriz Haddad MaiaHaddad Maia (0-1) – H2H and prediction
