Elizabeth Mandlik and Daria Snigur will square off in the qualifications of the Rothesay Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 1:00 pm on Court 2. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daria Snigur who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Daria Snigur is the pick to win this match.
Daria Snigur -> 1.58
Elizabeth Mandlik -> 2.27
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Elizabeth Mandlik vs. Daria Snigur
There is no head to head record between Elizabeth Mandlik and Daria Snigur since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Elizabeth Mandlik
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6-13 | 0-2 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-33 | 15-17 | 19-12 | 0-1 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 37-24 | 26-12 | 10-9 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 30-22 | 24-13 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-8 | 3-4 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 119, Elizabeth got to the qualifications after beating Iryna Shymanovich 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications, Mandlik had a good straight sets win against Shymanovich (6-4 6-4). During the match, Mandlik scored 66 points vs Shymanovich’s 58. Mandlik was pretty aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about the service games, Mandlik fired 2 aces and she committed only 1 double fault. Elizabeth Mandlik lost the serve twice and she saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Mandlik put 51% of her first serves in, winning 67% (22/33) of the points behind her 1st serve and 56% (18/32) on the 2nd serve. Elizabeth broke Shymanovich 4 times after converting 57% of her break points (4/7).
Mandlik has a winning match record in the last 7 years having won 58% of her matches (120-88). 2-1 on grass in 2023. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this competition, Mandlik has a composed2-1 match record in the last 7 years on grass.
The American’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in the Reus.
Elizabeth has an overall 17-17 win-loss record in 2023, 2-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Nottingham
Mandlik has never competed in this tournament before.
Daria Snigur
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 29-12 | 15-4 | 1-1 | 5-2 | 7-4 | 1-1 |
| 2023 | 39-25 | 11-8 | 3-2 | 14-8 | 6-5 | 5-2 |
| 2022 | 39-27 | 13-12 | 3-2 | 14-9 | 5-3 | 4-1 |
| 2021 | 32-17 | 18-9 | 1-2 | 9-3 | 3-2 | 1-1 |
| 2020 | 6-9 | 3-3 | 0-2 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 164, the Ukrainian reached the qualifications after beating Naiktha Bains 6-2 6-4.
In the qualifications, Daria had a good straight sets win against Bains (6-2 6-4). During the match Snigur scored 72 points vs Bains’s 55. Snigur was extremely aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about serving, Snigur was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she committed only 2 double faults. Daria Snigur lost the serve twice. Furthermore, Snigur put 86% of her first serves in, winning 68% (30/44) of the points behind her 1st serve and 57% (4/7) on the 2nd serve. Snigur broke Bains 5 times after converting 36% of her break points (5/14).
The Ukrainian’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in the Boutheon,the W60 Trnava,the W25+H Tossa de Mar and the Gaudens.
The Ukrainian has an aggregate 22-12 win-loss record in 2023, 3-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Nottingham
Previously, her best result was reaching the 1st round in 2022. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Mandlik | Snigur |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 18 |
| Pts | 66-58 | 72-55 |
| Total Points | 124 | 127 |
| Winners | 22 | 30 |
| %Winners | 33% | 42% |
Both Mandlik and Snigur played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Mandlik and Snigur have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Mandlik played 2 games more than Snigur. Elizabeth scored 22 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, The Ukrainian fired 30 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Mandlik | Snigur |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 0 |
| 1st in | 33/65 | 44/51 |
| %1st in | 51% | 86% |
| 1st pts | 22/33 | 30/44 |
| %1st pts | 67% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 18/32 | 4/7 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 57% |
Mandlik fired 2 aces . Snigur didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Mandlik won 67% points behind her first serve. She pretty solid on her second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Snigur won 68% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Mandlik | Snigur |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/7 | 5/14 |
| % Converted | 57% | 36% |
| Conceded | 3 | 2 |
| Saved | 1 | 0 |
| % Saved | 33% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Elizabeth broke her opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Elizabeth surrendered her serve twice and she saved 33% of the break points that she conceded. Snigur broke her opponent 5 times with a 36% conversion rate. The Ukrainian conceded her serve twice and she saved 0% of the break points that she conceded.
| Mandlik | |||
| Q1 Shymanovich |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 66-58 | 66-58 | |
| Total points | 124 | 124 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 33/65 | 33/65 | |
| % 1st in | 51% | 51% | |
| 1st pts | 22/33 | 22/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/32 | 18/32 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Snigur | |||
| Q1 Bains |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 72-55 | 72-55 | |
| Total points | 127 | 127 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 44/51 | 44/51 | |
| % 1st in | 86% | 86% | |
| 1st pts | 30/44 | 30/44 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/14 | 5/14 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 0/2 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWWLWLLL
LWWWWLWWLW Tennis Scores in Nottingham
- Yan BondarevskiyBondarevskiy – Nicolas Vicente Del ValleVicente Del Valle (6-1 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Francois-Arthur VibertVibert – Filippo StramigioliStramigioli (6-1 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Elizabeth MandlikMandlik – Daria SnigurSnigur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arina RodionovaRodionova – Olivia GadeckiGadecki (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Harriet DartDart – Eden SilvaSilva (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Emiliana ArangoArango – Emily AppletonAppleton (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maria SakkariSakkari – Xiyu WangWang (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Katie SwanSwan – Alize CornetCornet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Madison BrengleBrengle – Camila GiorgiGiorgi (3-3) – H2H and prediction
- Tereza MartincovaMartincova – Jodie Anna BurrageAnna Burrage (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alycia ParksParks – Lin ZhuZhu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Shuai ZhangZhang – Tatjana MariaMaria (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jil TeichmannTeichmann – Viktorija GolubicGolubic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Cristina BucsaBucsa – Donna VekicVekic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anhelina KalininaKalinina – Nuria Parrizas-DiazParrizas-Diaz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lesya TsurenkoTsurenko – Beatriz Haddad MaiaHaddad Maia (0-1) – H2H and prediction
