Carol Zhao and Kristina Dmitruk will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Libema Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 3:00 pm on COURT 2. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kristina Dmitruk who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Kristina Dmitruk is the pick to win this match.
Kristina Dmitruk -> 1.37
Carol Zhao -> 2.91
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Carol Zhao vs. Kristina Dmitruk
There is no head to head record between Carol Zhao and Kristina Dmitruk since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Carol Zhao
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19-27 | 11-16 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 4-2 |
| 2023 | 26-30 | 14-16 | 3-9 | 0-0 | 6-4 | 3-1 |
| 2022 | 32-25 | 18-17 | 10-5 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 24-19 | 11-9 | 13-8 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 178, the Canadian reached the qualifications after defeating Lexie Stevens 6-1 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Canadian had a good straight sets win against Stevens (6-1 6-4). During the match, Zhao scored 72 points vs Stevens’s 55. Carol was exceptionally aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Regarding the service games, Zhao bagged 2 aces and she committed only 4 double faults. Carol Zhao lost the serve once and she saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Zhao put 66% of her first serves in, winning 65% (28/43) of the points behind her 1st serve and 59% (13/22) on the 2nd serve. The Canadian broke Stevens 4 times after converting 33% of her break points (4/12).
Zhao has favorable match record in the last 10 years having won 54% of her matches (189-164). 1-1 on grass in 2023. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this event, Zhao has a composed 1-4 record in the last years on grass.
Zhao’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in the W60 Fukuoka.
Carol has an aggregate 11-15 win-loss record in 2023, 1-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in ‘s-Hertogenbosch
Carol has never competed in this tournament before.
Kristina Dmitruk
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19-8 | 0-0 | 19-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 22-18 | 7-5 | 11-7 | 3-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 47-18 | 39-13 | 7-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-12 | 4-5 | 7-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 219, the Belarussian reached the qualifications after defeating Sabine Lisicki 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Belarussian had a good straight sets win against Lisicki (6-3 6-4). During the match Dmitruk scored 59 points vs Lisicki’s 50. The Belarussian was very aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about serving, Dmitruk couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she committed only 4 double faults. Kristina Dmitruk was pretty efficient on serve to win 73% (33/45) of her 1st serve and 57% (8/14) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Belarussian was clinical in her return game without wasting any break point and break Lisicki twice.
The Belarussian’s best result of the season was reaching the final in the W25 Monastir.
The Belarussian has a composed 16-12 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Zhao | Dmitruk |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 19 |
| Pts | 72-55 | 59-50 |
| Total Points | 127 | 109 |
| Winners | 28 | 33 |
| %Winners | 39% | 56% |
Both Zhao and Dmitruk played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Zhao and Dmitruk have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Zhao played 2 games less than Dmitruk. Carol scored 28 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, The Belarussian bagged 33 winners (56%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Zhao | Dmitruk |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 0 |
| 1st in | 43/65 | 45/59 |
| %1st in | 66% | 76% |
| 1st pts | 28/43 | 33/45 |
| %1st pts | 65% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 13/22 | 8/14 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 57% |
Zhao struck 2 aces . Dmitruk didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Zhao won 65% points behind her first serve. She extremely effective on her second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Dmitruk won 73% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Zhao | Dmitruk |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 2 |
| Converted | 4/12 | 2/2 |
| % Converted | 33% | 100% |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 |
| Saved | 2 | 3 |
| % Saved | 67% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
Carol broke her opponent 4 times with a 33% conversion rate. The Canadian dropped her serve once and she saved 67% of the break points that she conceded. Kristina broke her opponent twice with a 100% conversion rate. The Belarussian was rock solid on her serve as she has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points.
| Zhao | |||
| Q1 Stevens |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 72-55 | 72-55 | |
| Total points | 127 | 127 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 43/65 | 43/65 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 28/43 | 28/43 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/22 | 13/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/12 | 4/12 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Dmitruk | |||
| Q1 Lisicki |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 59-50 | 59-50 | |
| Total points | 109 | 109 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 56% | 56% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 45/59 | 45/59 | |
| % 1st in | 76% | 76% | |
| 1st pts | 33/45 | 33/45 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/14 | 8/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/2 | 2/2 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWWLLWWL
LWWLLWWWWW Tennis Scores in ‘s Hertogenbosch
- Luka PavlovicPavlovic – Bogdan BajicBajic (7-65 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Priscilla HonHon – Natalija KosticKostic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lena RuefferRueffer – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sachia VickeryVickery – Zeynep SonmezSonmez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carol ZhaoZhao – Kristina DmitrukDmitruk (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emina BektasBektas – Ankita RainaRaina (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mai HontamaHontama – Susan BandecchiBandecchi (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Veronika KudermetovaKudermetova – Alison RiskeRiske (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Katie VolynetsVolynets – Caty McNallyMcNally (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Rebecca PetersonPeterson – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elise MertensMertens – Eva LysLys (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lesley KerkhoveKerkhove – Kimberly BirrellBirrell (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evgeniya RodinaRodina – Ekaterina AlexandrovaAlexandrova (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich – Lucrezia StefaniniStefanini (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Greetje MinnenMinnen – Jessika PonchetPonchet (0-1) – H2H and prediction
