Alexis Galarneau and Skander Mansouri will clash against each other in the quarter of the Tyler Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 11:00 am on STADIUM. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Alexis Galarneau who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Alexis Galarneau is the pick to win this match.
Alexis Galarneau -> 1.52
Skander Mansouri -> 2.45
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Alexis Galarneau vs. Skander Mansouri
This will be the 2nd time that Alexis Galarneau and Skander Mansouri face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Galarneau (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on hard.
The last time that they squared off, Galarneau won 6-3 6-4 in the 2nd round in the Calgary Challenger back in 2022.
Alexis Galarneau
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18-12 | 9-5 | 8-5 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 30-26 | 20-18 | 3-5 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 39-28 | 12-7 | 9-9 | 18-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-20 | 13-9 | 5-6 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 6-3 | 6-1 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 259, the Canadian reached the quarter after beating Gustavo Heide 6-4 6-2 and Tung-Lin Wu 6-2 6-78 6-4.
In the 2nd round, Galarneau defeated Wu (6-2 6-78 6-4). During the match, Galarneau scored 107 points vs Wu’s 87. Alexis was exceptionally aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Regarding the service games, Galarneau struck 6 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Alexis Galarneau lost the serve 3 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Galarneau put 56% of his first serves in, winning 65% (32/49) of the points behind his 1st serve and 61% (23/38) on the 2nd serve. The Canadian broke Wu 6 times after converting 86% of his break points (6/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Galarneau has dropped 1 set in this competition to win 56% of the points he played.
Galarneau has a winning match record in the last 9 years having won 54% of his matches (120-102). 7-7 on hard in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Galarneau has an aggregate69-52 win-loss record in the last 9 years on hard.
Galarneau has an aggregate 9-12 win-loss record in 2023, 7-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tyler Challenger
The Canadian has never competed in this tournament before.
Skander Mansouri
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 5-5 | 1-3 | 4-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-30 | 30-26 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 2-2 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 73-35 | 71-26 | 0-3 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 50-25 | 41-17 | 8-7 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 28-15 | 26-13 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 291, Skander got to the quarter after beating Dane Sweeny 6-2 6-4 and Aziz Dougaz 7-64 1-6 7-610.
In the 2nd round, Skander defeated Dougaz (7-64 1-6 7-610).During the match Mansouri scored less points (22) than Dougaz. In fact, the world no. 259 won 102 points vs Dougaz’s. That means that Mansouri was more focused during the important points. The Tunisian was pretty aggressive to blast 49 winners.
Talking about serving, Mansouri bagged 11 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Skander Mansouri lost the serve 5 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Mansouri put 62% of his first serves in, winning 69% (49/71) of the points behind his 1st serve and 37% (16/43) on the 2nd serve. Skander broke Dougaz 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Tunisian has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 48% of the points he played.
Skander’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Monastir.
Mansouri has a composed 17-11 win-loss record in 2023, 17-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Galarneau | Mansouri |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 49 | 51 |
| Pts | 163-129 | 160-171 |
| Total Points | 292 | 331 |
| Winners | 56 | 80 |
| %Winners | 34% | 50% |
Both Galarneau and Mansouri played 2 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Alexis Galarneau surrendered 1 set, while Skander Mansouri conceded 1 set. Talking about their workload, Galarneau and Mansouri have played the same amount of sets 5. However, Galarneau played 2 games less than Mansouri. Alexis scored 56 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, Skander struck 80 winners (50%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Galarneau | Mansouri |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 11 | 17 |
| Avg per match | 5.5 | 8.5 |
| 1st in | 78/137 | 106/165 |
| %1st in | 57% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 56/78 | 80/106 |
| %1st pts | 72% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 37/59 | 23/59 |
| %2nd pts | 63% | 39% |
Galarneau blasted 11 aces (5.5 per match). Mansouri scored 17 aces (8.5 per match). Galarneau won 72% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Mansouri won 75% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 39% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Galarneau | Mansouri |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 9 | 6 |
| Converted | 9/11 | 6/18 |
| % Converted | 82% | 33% |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 |
| Saved | 6 | 4 |
| % Saved | 67% | 44% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 5 |
Galarneau broke his opponents 9 times with a 82% conversion rate. Galarneau lost his serve 3 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Skander broke his opponents 6 times with a 33% conversion rate. Mansouri conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 44% of the break points that he conceded.
| Galarneau | ||||
| R1 Heide |
R2 Wu |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | 6-2 6-78 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 31 | 49 | |
| pts | 56-42 | 107-87 | 163-129 | |
| Total points | 98 | 194 | 292 | |
| Winners | 24 | 32 | 56 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 30% | 34% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 5 | 6 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 4 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 29/50 | 49/87 | 78/137 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 56% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 24/29 | 32/49 | 56/78 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 65% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/21 | 23/38 | 37/59 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 61% | 63% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 6 | 9 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 6/7 | 9/11 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 86% | 82% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 7 | 9 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 4/7 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 57% | 79% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 | 3 | |
| Mansouri | ||||
| R1 Sweeny |
R2 Dougaz |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | 7-64 1-6 7-610 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 33 | 51 | |
| pts | 58-47 | 102-124 | 160-171 | |
| Total points | 105 | 226 | 331 | |
| Winners | 31 | 49 | 80 | |
| %Winners | 53% | 48% | 50% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 6 | 11 | 17 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 5 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 35/51 | 71/114 | 106/165 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 62% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 31/35 | 49/71 | 80/106 | |
| % 1st pts | 89% | 69% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/16 | 16/43 | 23/59 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 37% | 39% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 3/10 | 6/18 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 30% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 8 | 9 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 3/8 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 38% | 69% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 5 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWLWWLL
LWLLWWWWLL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Skander MansouriMansouri – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adam NeffNeff – Peter GojowczykGojowczyk (0-0) – H2H and prediction
