Adam Neff and Peter Gojowczyk will fight against each other in the quarter of the Tyler Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 1:30 pm on STADIUM. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Peter Gojowczyk who should win in 2 sets.
Peter Gojowczyk -> 1.29
Adam Neff -> 3.44
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Adam Neff vs. Peter Gojowczyk
There is no head to head record between Adam Neff and Peter Gojowczyk since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Adam Neff
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13-16 | 7-9 | 1-2 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 7-8 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, the American reached the quarter after defeating Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva 4-6 6-2 6-3 and Christian Langmo 7-64 7-66.
In the 2nd round, The American had a good straight sets win against Langmo (7-64 7-66). During the match, Neff scored 80 points vs Langmo’s 78. Neff was quite aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Regarding the service games, Neff scored 15 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Adam Neff was very efficient on serve to win 88% (37/42) of his 1st serve and 60% (24/40) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match.
Overall Performance in this tournament
Adam has conceded 1 set in this tournament to win 52% of the points he played.
Neff has a winning match record in the last 2 years having won 56% of his matches (5-4). 2-0 on hard in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Neff has a compiled2-1 match record in the last 2 years on hard.
Adam has a composed 2-0 win-loss record in 2023, 2-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tyler Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Peter Gojowczyk
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 29-21 | 21-12 | 5-3 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 13-25 | 6-10 | 0-4 | 4-7 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 33-26 | 9-4 | 3-7 | 16-12 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 5-8 | 5-6 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 21-35 | 9-16 | 1-6 | 8-7 | 1-5 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 333, the German reached the quarter after defeating Ezekiel Clark 7-5 6-2, Evan Zhu 6-3 7-63, Bruno Kuzuhara 7-5 6-2 and Mark Lajal 6-1 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Peter had a good straight sets win against Lajal (6-1 6-3). During the match Gojowczyk scored 60 points vs Lajal’s 40. The German was quite aggressive to blast 28 winners.
About the serving games, Gojowczyk blasted 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Peter Gojowczyk conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 5 break points. Furthermore, Gojowczyk put 64% of his first serves in, winning 88% (28/32) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (8/18) on the 2nd serve. Peter broke Lajal 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Peter started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t dropped yet a set in this tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
Gojowczyk has a composed 13-8 win-loss record in 2023, 12-5 on hard (See FULL STATS)
.H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Neff | Gojowczyk |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 53 | 78 |
| Pts | 171-156 | 278-217 |
| Total Points | 327 | 495 |
| Winners | 76 | 102 |
| %Winners | 44% | 37% |
Neff played 2 matches while Gojowczyk competed in 4 matches. Gojowczyk started his run from the qualifications while Neff had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Adam Neff surrendered 1 set while Peter Gojowczyk hasn’t dropped a set so far. Neff has played 3 set(s) less than Gojowczyk (5 vs 8). Therefore, Neff played 25 games less than Gojowczyk. Neff scored 76 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, The German scored 102 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Neff | Gojowczyk |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 31 | 24 |
| Avg per match | 15.5 | 6 |
| 1st in | 95/170 | 126/239 |
| %1st in | 56% | 53% |
| 1st pts | 76/95 | 102/126 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 43/75 | 55/113 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 49% |
Neff blasted 31 aces (15.5 per match). Gojowczyk blasted 24 aces (6 per match). Neff won 80% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Gojowczyk won 81% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 49% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Neff | Gojowczyk |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 18 |
| Converted | 4/7 | 18/28 |
| % Converted | 57% | 64% |
| Conceded | 9 | 19 |
| Saved | 7 | 13 |
| % Saved | 78% | 68% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 6 |
The American broke his opponents 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Adam conceded his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded. Gojowczyk broke his opponents 18 times with a 64% conversion rate. Gojowczyk conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 68% of the break points that he conceded.
| Neff | ||||
| R1 Lucas Reis Da | R2 Langmo | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | 7-64 7-66 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 26 | 53 | |
| pts | 91-78 | 80-78 | 171-156 | |
| Total points | 169 | 158 | 327 | |
| Winners | 39 | 37 | 76 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 46% | 44% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 16 | 15 | 31 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 5 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 53/88 | 42/82 | 95/170 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 51% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 39/53 | 37/42 | 76/95 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 88% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/35 | 24/40 | 43/75 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 60% | 57% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 0 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 0/0 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 0% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 3 | 9 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 3/3 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 100% | 84% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| Gojowczyk | ||||||
| Q1 Clark | Q3 Zhu | R1 Kuzuhara | R2 Lajal | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-2 | 6-3 7-63 | 7-5 6-2 | 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 22 | 20 | 16 | 78 | |
| pts | 75-61 | 70-60 | 73-56 | 60-40 | 278-217 | |
| Total points | 136 | 130 | 129 | 100 | 495 | |
| Winners | 23 | 25 | 26 | 28 | 102 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 36% | 36% | 47% | 37% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 8 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 24 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 12 | |
| 1st in | 30/69 | 32/60 | 32/60 | 32/50 | 126/239 | |
| % 1st in | 43% | 53% | 53% | 64% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 23/30 | 25/32 | 26/32 | 28/32 | 102/126 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 78% | 81% | 88% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/39 | 18/28 | 16/28 | 8/18 | 55/113 | |
| % 2nd pts | 33% | 64% | 57% | 44% | 49% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 7 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 18 | |
| Converted | 7/9 | 3/7 | 4/7 | 4/5 | 18/28 | |
| Converted % | 78% | 43% | 57% | 80% | 64% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 19 | |
| Saved | 5/9 | 1/2 | 2/3 | 5/5 | 13 | |
| Saved % | 56% | 50% | 67% | 100% | 137% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Skander MansouriMansouri – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adam NeffNeff – Peter GojowczykGojowczyk (0-0) – H2H and prediction