Tennys Sandgren and Nick Chappell will square off in the 2nd round of the Tyler Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 4:00 pm on STADIUM. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tennys Sandgren who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tennys Sandgren is the pick to win this match.
Tennys Sandgren -> 1.24
Nick Chappell -> 3.74
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Tennys Sandgren vs. Nick Chappell
This will be the 2nd time that Tennys Sandgren and Nick Chappell square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Sandgren (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on hard.
The last time that they competed against each other, Sandgren won 7-5 6-3 in the 1st round in Canada F9.
Tennys Sandgren
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13-9 | 4-4 | 5-3 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 20-19 | 0-1 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 25-23 | 19-11 | 1-5 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-24 | 5-12 | 1-7 | 2-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-13 | 7-5 | 5-3 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 246, Sandgren got to the 2nd round after beating Adam Walton 4-6 6-3 7-64.
In the 1st round against Walton, Tennys recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 7-64). During the match, Sandgren scored 99 points vs Walton’s 94. Tennys was exceptionally aggressive to blast 53 winners.
Talking about the service games, Sandgren struck 19 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Tennys Sandgren lost the serve twice and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Sandgren put 62% of his first serves in, winning 80% (53/66) of the points behind his 1st serve and 49% (20/41) on the 2nd serve. Tennys broke Walton twice after converting 25% of his break points (2/8).
Sandgren has positive win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (272-215). 8-6 on hard in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Sandgren has a composed 157-115 record in the last years on hard.
Tennys’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in the Cleveland Challenger.
Sandgren has an overall 11-9 win-loss record in 2023, 8-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tyler Challenger
Tennys has never competed in this tournament before.
Nick Chappell
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 12-18 | 9-11 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 44-36 | 38-25 | 2-4 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-33 | 14-16 | 7-8 | 2-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-35 | 14-16 | 4-12 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 22-16 | 19-11 | 0-0 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 381, Nick reached the 2nd round after beating Bernard Tomic 7-5 6-3, Jose Statham 7-5 7-5 and Omni Kumar 6-4 6-2.
In the 1st round, Chappell had a good straight sets win against Kumar (6-4 6-2). During the match Chappell scored 72 points vs Kumar’s 61. Nick was very aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about serving, Chappell couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Nick Chappell lost the serve twice and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Chappell put 58% of his first serves in, winning 61% (22/36) of the points behind his 1st serve and 54% (14/26) on the 2nd serve. Chappell broke Kumar 5 times after converting 38% of his break points (5/13).
Chappell has an aggregate 15-13 win-loss record in 2023, 11-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Sandgren | Chappell |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 32 | 63 |
| Pts | 99-94 | 226-187 |
| Total Points | 193 | 413 |
| Winners | 53 | 87 |
| %Winners | 54% | 38% |
Sandgren played 1 match while Chappell competed in 3 matches. Chappell started his run from the qualifications while Sandgren had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Tennys Sandgren dropped 1 set while Nick Chappell hasn’t conceded a set so far. Sandgren has played 3 set(s) less than Chappell (3 vs 6). Therefore, Sandgren played 31 games less than Chappell. The American scored 53 winners (54% of the total points). On the other side, The American managed to score 87 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Sandgren | Chappell |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 19 | 15 |
| Avg per match | 19 | 5 |
| 1st in | 66/107 | 124/199 |
| %1st in | 62% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 53/66 | 87/124 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 20/41 | 39/75 |
| %2nd pts | 49% | 52% |
Sandgren blasted 19 aces . Chappell managed to score 15 aces (5 per match). Sandgren won 80% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 49% of the points. On the other side, Chappell won 70% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Sandgren | Chappell |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 14 |
| Converted | 2/8 | 14/27 |
| % Converted | 25% | 52% |
| Conceded | 7 | 17 |
| Saved | 5 | 11 |
| % Saved | 71% | 65% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 6 |
The American broke his opponent twice with a 25% conversion rate. Tennys lost his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded. Chappell broke his opponents 14 times with a 52% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 65% of the break points that he conceded.
| Sandgren | |||
| R1 Walton |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-3 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
| pts | 99-94 | 99-94 | |
| Total points | 193 | 193 | |
| Winners | 53 | 53 | |
| %Winners | 54% | 54% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 19 | 19 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 66/107 | 66/107 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 53/66 | 53/66 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/41 | 20/41 | |
| % 2nd pts | 49% | 49% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/8 | 2/8 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 71% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Chappell | |||||
| Q1 Tomic |
Q3 Statham |
R1 Kumar |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-3 | 7-5 7-5 | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 24 | 18 | 63 | |
| pts | 75-61 | 79-65 | 72-61 | 226-187 | |
| Total points | 136 | 144 | 133 | 413 | |
| Winners | 33 | 32 | 22 | 87 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 41% | 31% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 5 | 10 | 0 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 4 | 1 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 43/59 | 45/78 | 36/62 | 124/199 | |
| % 1st in | 73% | 58% | 58% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 33/43 | 32/45 | 22/36 | 87/124 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 71% | 61% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/16 | 17/33 | 14/26 | 39/75 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 52% | 54% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 5 | 5 | 14 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 5/5 | 5/13 | 14/27 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 100% | 38% | 52% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 12 | 3 | 17 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 9/12 | 1/3 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 75% | 33% | 158% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLWWWLW
LLLLWWLWLW Tennis Scores in Tyler Challenger
- Skander MansouriMansouri – Aziz DougazDougaz (7-64 1-6 7-610) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – Alex BoltBolt (7-65 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Tung-Lin WuWu (6-2 6-78 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – Marc PolmansPolmans (2-6 6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Peter GojowczykGojowczyk – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Nick ChappellChappell (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Skander MansouriMansouri – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Christian LangmoLangmo – Adam NeffNeff (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
