Dane Sweeny and Christian Langmo will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Tyler Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:30 pm on STADIUM. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Dane Sweeny who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Dane Sweeny is the pick to win this match.
Dane Sweeny -> 1.74
Christian Langmo -> 2.01
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Dane Sweeny vs. Christian Langmo
There is no head to head record between Dane Sweeny and Christian Langmo since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Dane Sweeny
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-16 | 14-11 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 35-33 | 25-23 | 10-8 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 62-26 | 59-22 | 3-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 27-23 | 19-15 | 1-1 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2020 | 5-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 236, Dane got to the qualifications after defeating Nathan Ponwith 4-6 7-5 6-2.
In the qualifications against Ponwith, The Australian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-5 6-2). During the match, Sweeny scored 95 points vs Ponwith’s 85. Sweeny was extremely aggressive to blast 44 winners.
Talking about the service games, Sweeny scored 6 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Dane Sweeny was pretty efficient on serve to win 75% (44/59) of his 1st serve and 52% (15/29) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Dane broke Ponwith 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Sweeny has a winning win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 59% of his matches (129-88). 10-7 on hard in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Sweeny has a composed103-57 win-loss record in the last 6 years on hard.
The Australian’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Canberra.
The Australian has a composed 20-15 win-loss record in 2023, 10-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tyler Challenger
Dane has never competed in this tournament before.
Christian Langmo
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23-18 | 18-13 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-31 | 30-23 | 5-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-24 | 15-16 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 49-25 | 40-19 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 9-9 | 9-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 353, Langmo got to the qualifications after defeating Alafia Ayeni 6-4 7-64.
In the qualifications, Langmo had a good straight sets win against Ayeni (6-4 7-64). During the match Langmo scored 75 points vs Ayeni’s 69. The American was quite aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Talking about serving, Langmo blasted 6 aces and he was very steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Christian Langmo was quite efficient on serve to win 77% (36/47) of his 1st serve and 62% (13/21) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The American broke Ayeni once after converting 17% of his break points (1/6).
The American’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Wesley Chapel and M15 Weston.
The American has a composed 26-12 win-loss record in 2023, 21-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Sweeny | Langmo |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 30 | 23 |
| Pts | 95-85 | 75-69 |
| Total Points | 180 | 144 |
| Winners | 44 | 36 |
| %Winners | 46% | 48% |
Both Sweeny and Langmo played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Dane Sweeny dropped 1 set while Christian Langmo hasn’t conceded a set so far. Sweeny has played 1 set more than Langmo (3 vs 2). Therefore, Sweeny played 7 games more than Langmo. The Australian scored 44 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, The American scored 36 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Sweeny | Langmo |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 6 |
| 1st in | 59/88 | 47/68 |
| %1st in | 67% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 44/59 | 36/47 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 15/29 | 13/21 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 62% |
Sweeny fired 6 aces . Langmo managed to score 6 aces . Sweeny won 75% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Langmo won 77% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Sweeny | Langmo |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 1 |
| Converted | 4/11 | 1/6 |
| % Converted | 36% | 17% |
| Conceded | 6 | 0 |
| Saved | 4 | 0 |
| % Saved | 67% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
Sweeny broke his opponent 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. The Australian surrendered his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Langmo broke his opponent once with a 17% conversion rate. Langmo was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Sweeny | |||
| Q1 Ponwith |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 7-5 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 95-85 | 95-85 | |
| Total points | 180 | 180 | |
| Winners | 44 | 44 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 59/88 | 59/88 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 44/59 | 44/59 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/29 | 15/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 4/11 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Langmo | |||
| Q1 Ayeni |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 75-69 | 75-69 | |
| Total points | 144 | 144 | |
| Winners | 36 | 36 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 47/68 | 47/68 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 36/47 | 36/47 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/21 | 13/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 1 | 1 | |
| Converted | 1/6 | 1/6 | |
| Converted % | 17% | 17% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLLLLLLW
LWWLWLWWWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jose StathamStatham – Nick ChappellChappell (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Peter GojowczykGojowczyk – Evan ZhuZhu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Tung-Lin WuWu (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MasurMasur – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Viktor DurasovicDurasovic – Marc PolmansPolmans (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Alex BoltBolt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aziz DougazDougaz – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran – Steven DiezDiez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adam WaltonWalton – Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva – Adam NeffNeff (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan BoyerBoyer – Marius CopilCopil (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Omni KumarKumar – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dane SweenySweeny – Christian LangmoLangmo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
