James McCabe and Mark Whitehouse will square off in the qualifications of the Surbiton Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 1:30 pm on CENTRE COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is James McCabe who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, James McCabe is the pick to win this match.
James McCabe -> 1.168
Mark Whitehouse -> 4.6
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head James McCabe vs. Mark Whitehouse
There is no head to head record between James McCabe and Mark Whitehouse since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
James McCabe
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 26-20 | 19-14 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-27 | 24-14 | 2-6 | 1-3 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 39-27 | 30-19 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 17-5 | 17-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 280, the Australian reached the qualifications after beating Johannus Monday 7-613 7-63.
In the qualifications, McCabe had a good straight sets win against Monday (7-613 7-63). During the match, McCabe scored 91 points vs Monday’s 89. McCabe was exceptionally aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Regarding the service games, McCabe made 9 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. James McCabe lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, McCabe put 72% of his first serves in, winning 64% (41/64) of the points behind his 1st serve and 72% (18/25) on the 2nd serve. McCabe broke Monday twice after converting 29% of his break points (2/7).
McCabe has a solid match record in the last 4 years having won 62% of his matches (76-46). 1-0 on grass in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, McCabe has an aggregate1-0 match record in the last 4 years on grass.
The Australian’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in the Bengaluru Challenger and the Puerto Vallarta Challenger.
James has an overall 20-14 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Surbiton Challenger
James has never competed in this tournament before.
Mark Whitehouse
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6-8 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2023 | 13-26 | 7-14 | 0-2 | 2-6 | 4-3 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 34-33 | 25-21 | 0-0 | 2-6 | 7-6 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 12-18 | 7-10 | 5-6 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-9 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 9-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 553, the Brit got to the qualifications after defeating Antoine Bellier 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, Whitehouse had a good straight sets win against Bellier (6-4 6-2). During the match Whitehouse scored 64 points vs Bellier’s 55. The Brit was exceptionally aggressive to blast 28 winners.
About the serving games, Whitehouse made 5 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Mark Whitehouse lost the serve once and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Whitehouse put 68% of his first serves in, winning 70% (28/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 53% (10/19) on the 2nd serve. Whitehouse broke Bellier 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Mark has an overall 4-11 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Surbiton Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | McCabe | Whitehouse |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 26 | 18 |
| Pts | 91-89 | 64-55 |
| Total Points | 180 | 119 |
| Winners | 41 | 28 |
| %Winners | 45% | 44% |
Both McCabe and Whitehouse played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, McCabe and Whitehouse have played the same amount of sets 2. However, McCabe played 8 games more than Whitehouse. McCabe scored 41 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, Mark recorded 28 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | McCabe | Whitehouse |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 9 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 9 | 5 |
| 1st in | 64/89 | 40/59 |
| %1st in | 72% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 41/64 | 28/40 |
| %1st pts | 64% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 18/25 | 10/19 |
| %2nd pts | 72% | 53% |
McCabe blasted 9 aces . Whitehouse recorded 5 aces . McCabe won 64% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 72% of the points. On the other side, Whitehouse won 70% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | McCabe | Whitehouse |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 4 |
| Converted | 2/7 | 4/9 |
| % Converted | 29% | 44% |
| Conceded | 5 | 7 |
| Saved | 3 | 6 |
| % Saved | 60% | 86% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
McCabe broke his opponent twice with a 29% conversion rate. McCabe conceded his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. The Brit broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Whitehouse conceded his serve once and he saved 86% of the break points that he conceded.
| McCabe | |||
| Q1 Monday |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-613 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 91-89 | 91-89 | |
| Total points | 180 | 180 | |
| Winners | 41 | 41 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 9 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 64/89 | 64/89 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 72% | |
| 1st pts | 41/64 | 41/64 | |
| % 1st pts | 64% | 64% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/25 | 18/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 72% | 72% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/7 | 2/7 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 29% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Whitehouse | |||
| Q1 Bellier |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 64-55 | 64-55 | |
| Total points | 119 | 119 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 40/59 | 40/59 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 28/40 | 28/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/19 | 10/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 6/7 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 86% | 86% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLWWLLW
LWLLLWLWWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Daniel CoxCox – (1-4) – H2H and prediction
- Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert – Harry WendelkenWendelken (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler – Gijs BrouwerBrouwer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Liam BroadyBroady – Gabriel DialloDiallo (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jiri VeselyVesely – Ryan PenistonPeniston (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Denis KudlaKudla (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hyeon ChungChung – Andy MurrayMurray (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Max PurcellPurcell – Zizou BergsBergs (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ilya IvashkaIvashka – Hugo GrenierGrenier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Luke SavilleSaville (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Billy HarrisHarris – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mark WhitehouseWhitehouse – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Christopher EubanksEubanks (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Otto VirtanenVirtanen – Jurij RodionovRodionov (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
