Francisco Comesana and Vitaliy Sachko will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Vicenza Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 11:30 am on COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Francisco Comesana who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Francisco Comesana is the pick to win this match.
Francisco Comesana -> 1.68
Vitaliy Sachko -> 2.09
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Francisco Comesana vs. Vitaliy Sachko
There is no head to head record between Francisco Comesana and Vitaliy Sachko since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Francisco Comesana
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18-15 | 1-2 | 16-12 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 59-25 | 2-2 | 57-23 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-18 | 2-2 | 28-16 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 49-15 | 0-0 | 49-15 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-10 | 7-6 | 5-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 241, Francisco reached the 2nd round after defeating Kimmer Coppejans 6-3 7-64.
In the 1st round, The Argentine had a good straight sets win against Coppejans (6-3 7-64). During the match, Comesana scored 83 points vs Coppejans’s 69. Comesana was extremely aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about the service games, Comesana blasted 6 aces and he was very consistent in conceding no double faults. Overall, Francisco Comesana was exceptionally effective on serve to win 76% (35/46) of his 1st serve and 52% (12/23) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The Argentine broke Coppejans 3 times after converting 25% of his break points (3/12).
Comesana has a solid win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 64% of his matches (190-106). 23-11 on clay in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Comesana has an aggregate181-95 win-loss record in the last 7 years on clay.
The Argentine’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Tucuman and the Skopje Challenger.
The Argentine has a compiled 23-12 win-loss record in 2023, 23-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Vicenza Challenger
Vitaliy Sachko
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 9-13 | 3-3 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 47-32 | 4-3 | 28-16 | 15-12 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 24-33 | 2-3 | 12-18 | 8-10 | 0-1 | 2-1 |
| 2021 | 42-28 | 0-2 | 24-17 | 18-7 | 0-0 | 0-2 |
| 2020 | 21-12 | 8-5 | 7-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 275, Sachko got to the 2nd round after beating Andrea Arnaboldi 6-4 6-2, Giovanni Fonio 6-4 7-61 and Joao Sousa 6-2 7-64.
In the 1st round, The Ukrainian had a good straight sets win against Sousa (6-2 7-64). During the match Sachko scored 78 points vs Sousa’s 64. The Ukrainian was quite aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about serving, Sachko recorded 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Vitaliy Sachko lost the serve once and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Sachko put 66% of his first serves in, winning 73% (38/52) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (13/27) on the 2nd serve. The Ukrainian broke Sousa 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Sachko has an aggregate 25-14 win-loss record in 2023, 9-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Vicenza Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Comesana | Sachko |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 62 |
| Pts | 83-69 | 214-174 |
| Total Points | 152 | 388 |
| Winners | 35 | 97 |
| %Winners | 42% | 45% |
Comesana played 1 match while Sachko competed in 3 matches. Sachko started his run from the qualifications while Comesana had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Comesana has played 4 set(s) less than Sachko (2 vs 6). Therefore, Comesana played 40 games less than Sachko. Francisco scored 35 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Sachko recorded 97 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Comesana | Sachko |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 2.3 |
| 1st in | 46/69 | 126/195 |
| %1st in | 67% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 35/46 | 97/126 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 12/23 | 41/69 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 59% |
Comesana scored 6 aces . Sachko recorded 7 aces (2.3 per match). Comesana won 76% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Sachko won 77% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Comesana | Sachko |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 8 |
| Converted | 3/12 | 8/15 |
| % Converted | 25% | 53% |
| Conceded | 7 | 9 |
| Saved | 5 | 7 |
| % Saved | 71% | 78% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
The Argentine broke his opponent 3 times with a 25% conversion rate. The Argentine dropped his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded. Vitaliy broke his opponents 8 times with a 53% conversion rate. The Ukrainian conceded his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded.
| Comesana | |||
| R1 Coppejans |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 83-69 | 83-69 | |
| Total points | 152 | 152 | |
| Winners | 35 | 35 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 46/69 | 46/69 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 35/46 | 35/46 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/23 | 12/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/12 | 3/12 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 71% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Sachko | |||||
| Q1 Arnaboldi |
Q3 Fonio |
R1 Sousa |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | 6-4 7-61 | 6-2 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 23 | 21 | 62 | |
| pts | 53-36 | 83-74 | 78-64 | 214-174 | |
| Total points | 89 | 157 | 142 | 388 | |
| Winners | 21 | 38 | 38 | 97 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 46% | 49% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 25/42 | 49/74 | 52/79 | 126/195 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 66% | 66% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 21/25 | 38/49 | 38/52 | 97/126 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 78% | 73% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/17 | 13/25 | 13/27 | 41/69 | |
| % 2nd pts | 88% | 52% | 48% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | |
| Converted | 3/3 | 2/8 | 3/4 | 8/15 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 25% | 75% | 53% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 2/3 | 5/6 | 7 | |
| Saved % | – | 67% | 83% | 150% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
WLLLLWWWLW
WLLWLLWLLL Tennis Scores in Vicenza Challenger
- Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel – Nerman FaticFatic (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Riccardo BonadioBonadio (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Roman Andres BurruchagaAndres Burruchaga – Franco AgamenoneAgamenone (7-63 6-2) – See score progression
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Gabriele PirainoPiraino (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Mariano NavoneNavone – Federico GaioGaio (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – Vit KoprivaKopriva (6-0 7-5) – See score progression
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (6-3 7-64) – See score progression
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Lorenzo RottoliRottoli (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Joao SousaSousa (6-2 7-64) – See score progression
- Luca NardiNardi – Luciano DarderiDarderi (1-6 6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Pablo Llamas RuizLlamas Ruiz – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Matheus Pucinelli De AlmeidaPucinelli De Almeida – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel – Nerman FaticFatic (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna – Matteo GiganteGigante (1-6 6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – Vit KoprivaKopriva (6-0 7-5) – See score progression
- Roman Andres BurruchagaAndres Burruchaga – Franco AgamenoneAgamenone (7-6(3) 6-2) – See score progression
- Mariano NavoneNavone – Federico GaioGaio (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Lorenzo RottoliRottoli (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Riccardo BonadioBonadio (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – Matheus Pucinelle De AlmeidaPucinelle De Almeida (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Francisco ComesanaComesana (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pablo Llamas RuizLlamas Ruiz – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (0-1) – H2H and prediction
