Adam Walton and Mukund Sasikumar will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Little Rock Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:30 pm on COURT 13. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Adam Walton who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Adam Walton is the pick to win this match.
Adam Walton -> 1.54
Mukund Sasikumar -> 2.36
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Adam Walton vs. Mukund Sasikumar
There is no head to head record between Adam Walton and Mukund Sasikumar since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Adam Walton
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 39-20 | 36-14 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 56-30 | 53-26 | 0-1 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-12 | 41-10 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 288 (career-high), Adam reached the qualifications after beating Gabriele Thomas Brancatelli 6-1 6-0.
In the qualifications, Adam had a good straight sets win against Thomas Brancatelli (6-1 6-0). During the match, Walton scored 55 points vs Thomas Brancatelli’s 28. The Australian was pretty aggressive to blast 15 winners.
Talking about the service games, Walton scored just 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 3 double faults. Adam Walton was quite effective on serve to win 83% (15/18) of his 1st serve and 60% (9/15) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Adam broke Thomas Brancatelli 6 times after converting 60% of his break points (6/10).
Walton has a solid win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 69% of his matches (76-34). 24-12 on hard in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Walton has a composed74-28 match record in the last 5 years on hard.
The Australian’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Santo Domingo and M15 Tbilisi.
Adam has an overall 24-13 win-loss record in 2023, 24-12 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Little Rock Challenger
Walton has never competed in this tournament before.
Mukund Sasikumar
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18-17 | 18-17 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 25-31 | 21-25 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 48-35 | 33-21 | 6-7 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 28-32 | 25-24 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-9 | 4-4 | 0-3 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 383, Sasi got to the qualifications after beating Donald Young 6-1 6-4.
In the qualifications, Sasi had a good straight sets win against Young (6-1 6-4). During the match Kumar Mukund scored 61 points vs Young’s 42. Sasi was exceptionally aggressive to blast 19 winners.
About the serving games, Kumar Mukund recorded 9 aces and he was extremely steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Mukund Sasikumar was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 79% (19/24) of his 1st serve and 68% (15/22) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Indian broke Young 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Kumar Mukund’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in M25 Lucknow.
Kumar Mukund has a composed 13-14 win-loss record in 2023, 13-14 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Little Rock Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2021. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Walton | Kumar Mukund |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 13 | 17 |
| Pts | 55-28 | 61-42 |
| Total Points | 83 | 103 |
| Winners | 15 | 19 |
| %Winners | 27% | 31% |
Both Walton and Kumar Mukund played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Walton and Kumar Mukund have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Walton played 4 games less than Kumar Mukund. Walton scored 15 winners (27% of the total points). On the other side, Sasi managed to score 19 winners (31%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Walton | Kumar Mukund |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 9 |
| 1st in | 18/33 | 24/46 |
| %1st in | 55% | 52% |
| 1st pts | 15/18 | 19/24 |
| %1st pts | 83% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 9/15 | 15/22 |
| %2nd pts | 60% | 68% |
Walton scored 1 ace . Kumar Mukund also recorded 9 aces . Walton won 83% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Kumar Mukund won 79% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 68% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Walton | Kumar Mukund |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 4 |
| Converted | 6/10 | 4/9 |
| % Converted | 60% | 44% |
| Conceded | 0 | 1 |
| Saved | 0 | 0 |
| % Saved | 0% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
The Australian broke his opponent 6 times with a 60% conversion rate. Walton was rock solid on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 0 break points. The Indian broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. The Indian conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
| Walton | |||
| Q1 Thomas |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 13 | |
| pts | 55-28 | 55-28 | |
| Total points | 83 | 83 | |
| Winners | 15 | 15 | |
| %Winners | 27% | 27% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 18/33 | 18/33 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 15/18 | 15/18 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/15 | 9/15 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/10 | 6/10 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Kumar Mukund | |||
| Q1 Young |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 61-42 | 61-42 | |
| Total points | 103 | 103 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 31% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 9 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 24/46 | 24/46 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 19/24 | 19/24 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/22 | 15/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 68% | 68% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLLLLWW
WWWWLLLLWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Peter GojowczykGojowczyk – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – Viktor DurasovicDurasovic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MasurMasur – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Skander MansouriMansouri – Aziz DougazDougaz (3-5) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian LangmoLangmo – Bernard TomicTomic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marek GengelGengel – Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan ZhuZhu – Tristan BoyerBoyer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adam WaltonWalton – Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Colin MarkesMarkes (0-0) – H2H and prediction
