Christian Langmo and Bernard Tomic will play each other in the qualifications of the Little Rock Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:30 pm on STADIUM COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Christian Langmo who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Christian Langmo is the pick to win this match.
Christian Langmo -> 1.68
Bernard Tomic -> 2.09
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Christian Langmo vs. Bernard Tomic
There is no head to head record between Christian Langmo and Bernard Tomic since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Christian Langmo
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23-18 | 18-13 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-31 | 30-23 | 5-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-24 | 15-16 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 49-25 | 40-19 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 9-9 | 9-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 353, Langmo got to the qualifications after defeating Gustavo Heide 6-2 4-6 6-3.
In the qualifications, The American defeated Heide (6-2 4-6 6-3). During the match, Langmo scored 98 points vs Heide’s 89. Christian was very aggressive to blast 43 winners.
Regarding the service games, Langmo recorded 12 aces and he committed only 9 double faults. Christian Langmo lost the serve 3 times and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Langmo put 60% of his first serves in, winning 78% (43/55) of the points behind his 1st serve and 33% (12/36) on the 2nd serve. Christian broke Heide 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Langmo has a solid record in the last 7 years having won 60% of his matches (168-111). 19-6 on hard in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Langmo has a compiled140-85 win-loss record in the last 7 years on hard.
Christian’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Wesley Chapel and M15 Weston.
Christian has an aggregate 24-11 win-loss record in 2023, 19-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Little Rock Challenger
Bernard Tomic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 32-16 | 24-13 | 8-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-27 | 35-19 | 4-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-12 | 24-7 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 9-12 | 4-4 | 2-4 | 2-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 3-6 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 390, the Australian got to the qualifications after beating Tristan Mccormick 6-3 7-5.
In the qualifications, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Mccormick (6-3 7-5). During the match Tomic scored 72 points vs Mccormick’s 55. The Australian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about serving, Tomic recorded 8 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Bernard Tomic lost the serve twice and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Tomic put 64% of his first serves in, winning 79% (31/39) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (10/22) on the 2nd serve. The Australian broke Mccormick 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
The Australian’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Doha.
The Australian has an overall 15-8 win-loss record in 2023, 13-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Little Rock Challenger
The Australian has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Langmo | Tomic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 27 | 21 |
| Pts | 98-89 | 72-55 |
| Total Points | 187 | 127 |
| Winners | 43 | 31 |
| %Winners | 44% | 43% |
Both Langmo and Tomic played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Christian Langmo surrendered 1 set while Bernard Tomic hasn’t dropped a set so far. Langmo has played 1 set more than Tomic (3 vs 2). Therefore, Langmo played 6 games more than Tomic. Langmo scored 43 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, The Australian struck 31 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Langmo | Tomic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 12 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 12 | 8 |
| 1st in | 55/91 | 39/61 |
| %1st in | 60% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 43/55 | 31/39 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 12/36 | 10/22 |
| %2nd pts | 33% | 45% |
Langmo scored 12 aces . Tomic bagged 8 aces . Langmo won 78% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 33% of the points. On the other side, Tomic won 79% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Langmo | Tomic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 4 |
| Converted | 5/8 | 4/6 |
| % Converted | 63% | 67% |
| Conceded | 10 | 3 |
| Saved | 7 | 1 |
| % Saved | 70% | 33% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 2 |
The American broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. The American dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 70% of the break points that he conceded. The Australian broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. Bernard conceded his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded.
| Langmo | |||
| Q1 Heide |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 4-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | 98-89 | 98-89 | |
| Total points | 187 | 187 | |
| Winners | 43 | 43 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 12 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 9 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 55/91 | 55/91 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 43/55 | 43/55 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/36 | 12/36 | |
| % 2nd pts | 33% | 33% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 7/10 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 70% | 70% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Tomic | |||
| Q1 Mccormick |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 72-55 | 72-55 | |
| Total points | 127 | 127 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 39/61 | 39/61 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 31/39 | 31/39 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/22 | 10/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWLWWWL
LWWLWWWWLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Peter GojowczykGojowczyk – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – Viktor DurasovicDurasovic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MasurMasur – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Skander MansouriMansouri – Aziz DougazDougaz (3-5) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian LangmoLangmo – Bernard TomicTomic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marek GengelGengel – Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan ZhuZhu – Tristan BoyerBoyer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adam WaltonWalton – Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Colin MarkesMarkes (0-0) – H2H and prediction
