Liam Gavrielides and Benjamin Hassan will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Troisdorf Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:00 pm on B&B COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Benjamin Hassan who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Benjamin Hassan is the pick to win this match.
Benjamin Hassan -> 1.3
Liam Gavrielides -> 3.3
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Liam Gavrielides vs. Benjamin Hassan
There is no head to head record between Liam Gavrielides and Benjamin Hassan since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Liam Gavrielides
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 34-29 | 6-6 | 26-17 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 35-27 | 6-3 | 29-21 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 7-13 | 0-0 | 5-9 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, the German reached the qualifications after beating Manuel Guinard 6-2 2-6 6-2.
In the qualifications, Gavrielides defeated Guinard (6-2 2-6 6-2). During the match, Gavrielides scored 79 points vs Guinard’s 64. Liam was very aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about the service games, Gavrielides struck 6 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Liam Gavrielides was quite efficient on serve to win 73% (35/48) of his 1st serve and 54% (13/24) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Gavrielides broke Guinard 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Gavrielides has a winning match record in the last 4 years having won 53% of his matches (28-25). 17-7 on clay in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Gavrielides has a composed24-18 record in the last 4 years on clay.
Gavrielides has a composed 17-9 win-loss record in 2023, 17-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Troisdorf Challenger
Gavrielides has never competed in this tournament before.
Benjamin Hassan
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 25-31 | 3-10 | 20-16 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 57-33 | 11-6 | 35-20 | 10-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-29 | 7-3 | 21-16 | 8-9 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 21-23 | 2-2 | 17-16 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2020 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 4-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 284, Benjamin reached the qualifications after defeating Hazem Naow 4-6 7-65 7-5.
In the qualifications against Naow, The Lebanese recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-65 7-5).During the match Hassan scored less points (1) than Naow. In fact, the world no. won 117 points vs Naow’s. That means that Hassan was more focused during the important points. The Lebanese was pretty aggressive to blast 43 winners.
About the serving games, Hassan recorded 6 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Benjamin Hassan was pretty effective on serve to win 75% (43/57) of his 1st serve and 52% (24/46) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 4 times. The Lebanese broke Naow 4 times after converting 31% of his break points (4/13).
Benjamin’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in M25 Al Zahra,the Biel Challenger and the Florianopolis Challenger.
Benjamin has an aggregate 19-14 win-loss record in 2023, 10-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Troisdorf Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gavrielides | Hassan |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 24 | 35 |
| Pts | 79-64 | 117-118 |
| Total Points | 143 | 235 |
| Winners | 35 | 43 |
| %Winners | 44% | 37% |
Both Gavrielides and Hassan played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Liam Gavrielides dropped 1 set, while Benjamin Hassan lost 1 set. Talking about their workload, Gavrielides and Hassan have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Gavrielides played 11 games less than Hassan. Liam scored 35 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, The Lebanese scored 43 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gavrielides | Hassan |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 6 |
| 1st in | 48/72 | 57/103 |
| %1st in | 67% | 55% |
| 1st pts | 35/48 | 43/57 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 13/24 | 24/46 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 52% |
Gavrielides blasted 6 aces . Hassan blasted 6 aces . Gavrielides won 73% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Hassan won 75% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gavrielides | Hassan |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/13 |
| % Converted | 67% | 31% |
| Conceded | 7 | 8 |
| Saved | 5 | 4 |
| % Saved | 71% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 4 |
The German broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. Gavrielides conceded his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded. Hassan broke his opponent 4 times with a 31% conversion rate. Hassan conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Gavrielides | |||
| Q1 Guinard |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 2-6 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 24 | 24 | |
| pts | 79-64 | 79-64 | |
| Total points | 143 | 143 | |
| Winners | 35 | 35 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 48/72 | 48/72 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 35/48 | 35/48 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/24 | 13/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 71% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Hassan | |||
| Q1 Naow |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 7-65 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 35 | 35 | |
| pts | 117-118 | 117-118 | |
| Total points | 235 | 235 | |
| Winners | 43 | 43 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 57/103 | 57/103 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 43/57 | 43/57 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 24/46 | 24/46 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/13 | 4/13 | |
| Converted % | 31% | 31% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 4/8 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWLWWWLW
LLLWWLWLLL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jose PereiraPereira – Karl FribergFriberg (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mats MoraingMoraing – Jelle SelsSels (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla – Constantin Bittoun KouzmineBittoun Kouzmine (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Zizou BergsBergs (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ivan GakhovGakhov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek – Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sumit NagalNagal – Robert StrombachsStrombachs (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Zsombor PirosPiros (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin HassanHassan – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas KleinKlein – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick HardtHardt – Louis WesselsWessels (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Pavel KotovKotov – Joris De LooreDe Loore (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Henri SquireSquire – Adrian AndreevAndreev (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gauthier OnclinOnclin – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Marvin MoellerMoeller (0-0) – H2H and prediction
