Sumit Nagal and Robert Strombachs will play each other in the qualifications of the Troisdorf Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:30 am on B&B COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Sumit Nagal who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Sumit Nagal is the pick to win this match.
Sumit Nagal -> 1.174
Robert Strombachs -> 4.5
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Sumit Nagal vs. Robert Strombachs
There is no head to head record between Sumit Nagal and Robert Strombachs since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Sumit Nagal
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-14 | 15-8 | 13-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-29 | 9-8 | 32-17 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-18 | 0-1 | 16-17 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-26 | 1-4 | 22-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-14 | 2-4 | 5-5 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 254, Sumit reached the qualifications after beating Sergey Fomin 6-1 6-1.
In the qualifications, Nagal had a good straight sets win against Fomin (6-1 6-1). During the match, Nagal scored 58 points vs Fomin’s 30. Nagal was exceptionally aggressive to blast 20 winners.
Talking about the service games, Nagal scored just 1 ace in the course of the match and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Sumit Nagal was quite efficient on serve to win 74% (20/27) of his 1st serve and 53% (9/17) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Nagal broke Fomin 6 times after converting 67% of his break points (6/9).
Nagal has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 61% of his matches (276-178). 15-5 on clay in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Nagal has an aggregate 192-109 record in the last years on clay.
His best result of the season was winning the title the Rome Challenger where he beat Jesper De Jong in the final 6-3 6-2.
Nagal has a compiled 23-12 win-loss record in 2023, 15-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Troisdorf Challenger
Sumit has never competed in this tournament before.
Robert Strombachs
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-18 | 3-3 | 4-8 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2023 | 54-33 | 44-21 | 6-8 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2022 | 68-30 | 47-21 | 15-4 | 6-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-26 | 18-15 | 1-3 | 1-6 | 0-1 | 1-1 |
| 2020 | 13-11 | 6-5 | 3-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 3-3 |
Ranked no. 411, the German reached the qualifications after beating Maxime Janvier 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications, Robert had a good straight sets win against Janvier (6-3 6-4). During the match Strombachs scored 68 points vs Janvier’s 54. Strombachs was exceptionally aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Talking about serving, Strombachs fired 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Robert Strombachs lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Strombachs put 75% of his first serves in, winning 76% (37/49) of the points behind his 1st serve and 38% (6/16) on the 2nd serve. Strombachs broke Janvier 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Robert’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Sharm ElSheikh and M25 Sanxenxo.
The German has a compiled 26-13 win-loss record in 2023, 2-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Nagal | Strombachs |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 14 | 19 |
| Pts | 58-30 | 68-54 |
| Total Points | 88 | 122 |
| Winners | 20 | 37 |
| %Winners | 34% | 54% |
Both Nagal and Strombachs played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Nagal and Strombachs have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Nagal played 5 games less than Strombachs. The Indian scored 20 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, Robert struck 37 winners (54%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Nagal | Strombachs |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 2 |
| 1st in | 27/44 | 49/65 |
| %1st in | 61% | 75% |
| 1st pts | 20/27 | 37/49 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 9/17 | 6/16 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 38% |
Nagal recorded 1 ace . Strombachs also bagged 2 aces . Nagal won 74% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Strombachs won 76% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 38% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Nagal | Strombachs |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 3 |
| Converted | 6/9 | 3/4 |
| % Converted | 67% | 75% |
| Conceded | 5 | 2 |
| Saved | 4 | 1 |
| % Saved | 80% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
The Indian broke his opponent 6 times with a 67% conversion rate. Sumit dropped his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. The German broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. Robert conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Nagal | |||
| Q1 Fomin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
| pts | 58-30 | 58-30 | |
| Total points | 88 | 88 | |
| Winners | 20 | 20 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 27/44 | 27/44 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 20/27 | 20/27 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/17 | 9/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/9 | 6/9 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Strombachs | |||
| Q1 Janvier |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 68-54 | 68-54 | |
| Total points | 122 | 122 | |
| Winners | 37 | 37 | |
| %Winners | 54% | 54% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 49/65 | 49/65 | |
| % 1st in | 75% | 75% | |
| 1st pts | 37/49 | 37/49 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/16 | 6/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | 38% | 38% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWWWWWW
LLLLWLWLLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jose PereiraPereira – Karl FribergFriberg (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mats MoraingMoraing – Jelle SelsSels (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla – Constantin Bittoun KouzmineBittoun Kouzmine (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Zizou BergsBergs (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ivan GakhovGakhov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek – Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sumit NagalNagal – Robert StrombachsStrombachs (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Zsombor PirosPiros (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin HassanHassan – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas KleinKlein – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick HardtHardt – Louis WesselsWessels (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Pavel KotovKotov – Joris De LooreDe Loore (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Henri SquireSquire – Adrian AndreevAndreev (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gauthier OnclinOnclin – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Marvin MoellerMoeller (0-0) – H2H and prediction
