Nick Hardt and Louis Wessels will play each other in the qualifications of the Troisdorf Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:00 pm on SATURN CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Nick Hardt who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Nick Hardt is the pick to win this match.
Nick Hardt -> 1.4
Louis Wessels -> 2.78
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Nick Hardt vs. Louis Wessels
This will be the 2nd time that Nick Hardt and Louis Wessels square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Wessels (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they played, Wessels won 4-6 7-5 7-6(5) in the final in M25 Marburg back in 2021.
Nick Hardt
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 37-18 | 6-5 | 30-12 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 22-28 | 11-9 | 10-16 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 51-25 | 18-6 | 28-16 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 44-19 | 9-6 | 35-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-11 | 6-6 | 2-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 222, Nick reached the qualifications after defeating Orlando Luz 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications, Nick had a good straight sets win against Luz (6-3 6-2). During the match, Hardt scored 61 points vs Luz’s 35. The Dominican was very aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Regarding the service games, Hardt blasted 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Nick Hardt was quite efficient on serve to win 92% (23/25) of his 1st serve and 61% (11/18) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Dominican broke Luz 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Hardt has a solid match record in the last 7 years having won 61% of his matches (171-108). 6-7 on clay in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Hardt has an aggregate108-64 match record in the last 7 years on clay.
Hardt has an overall 11-14 win-loss record in 2023, 6-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Troisdorf Challenger
The Dominican has never competed in this tournament before.
Louis Wessels
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-18 | 3-1 | 9-13 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 1-1 |
| 2023 | 37-36 | 4-4 | 26-18 | 3-10 | 2-2 | 2-2 |
| 2022 | 46-34 | 7-4 | 39-27 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 40-23 | 0-1 | 32-19 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2020 | 3-5 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 323, Louis got to the qualifications after beating Max Hans Rehberg 7-66 4-6 6-3.
In the qualifications, Wessels defeated Hans Rehberg (7-66 4-6 6-3). During the match Wessels scored 101 points vs Hans Rehberg’s 99. Louis was quite aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Talking about serving, Wessels made 11 aces and he committed only 9 double faults. Louis Wessels lost the serve 4 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Wessels put 55% of his first serves in, winning 72% (41/57) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (22/47) on the 2nd serve. Louis broke Hans Rehberg 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Wessels’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in M15 Meerbusch.
The German has an aggregate 9-16 win-loss record in 2023, 6-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Troisdorf Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Hardt | Wessels |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 32 |
| Pts | 61-35 | 101-99 |
| Total Points | 96 | 200 |
| Winners | 23 | 41 |
| %Winners | 38% | 41% |
Both Hardt and Wessels played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Louis Wessels dropped 1 set while Nick Hardt hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Hardt has played 1 set(s) less than Wessels (2 vs 3). Therefore, Hardt played 15 games less than Wessels. Hardt scored 23 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, The German recorded 41 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Hardt | Wessels |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 11 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 11 |
| 1st in | 25/43 | 57/104 |
| %1st in | 58% | 55% |
| 1st pts | 23/25 | 41/57 |
| %1st pts | 92% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 11/18 | 22/47 |
| %2nd pts | 61% | 47% |
Hardt made 5 aces . Wessels bagged 11 aces . Hardt won 92% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 61% of the points. On the other side, Wessels won 72% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Hardt | Wessels |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 |
| % Converted | 50% | 50% |
| Conceded | 1 | 7 |
| Saved | 0 | 3 |
| % Saved | 0% | 43% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 |
The Dominican broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Dominican dropped his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Wessels broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Wessels conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 43% of the break points that he conceded.
| Hardt | |||
| Q1 Luz |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 61-35 | 61-35 | |
| Total points | 96 | 96 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 25/43 | 25/43 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 23/25 | 23/25 | |
| % 1st pts | 92% | 92% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/18 | 11/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Wessels | |||
| Q1 Hans |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-66 4-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
| pts | 101-99 | 101-99 | |
| Total points | 200 | 200 | |
| Winners | 41 | 41 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 11 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 9 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 57/104 | 57/104 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 41/57 | 41/57 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/47 | 22/47 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 3/7 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 43% | 43% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWLLWWL
LWLWLLWLLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jose PereiraPereira – Karl FribergFriberg (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mats MoraingMoraing – Jelle SelsSels (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla – Constantin Bittoun KouzmineBittoun Kouzmine (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Zizou BergsBergs (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ivan GakhovGakhov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek – Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sumit NagalNagal – Robert StrombachsStrombachs (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Zsombor PirosPiros (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin HassanHassan – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas KleinKlein – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick HardtHardt – Louis WesselsWessels (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Pavel KotovKotov – Joris De LooreDe Loore (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Henri SquireSquire – Adrian AndreevAndreev (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gauthier OnclinOnclin – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Marvin MoellerMoeller (0-0) – H2H and prediction
