Gerard Campana Lee and Nerman Fatic will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Skopje Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 11:00 am on COURT 5. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Nerman Fatic who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Nerman Fatic is the pick to win this match.
Nerman Fatic -> 1.5
Gerard Campana Lee -> 2.46
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Gerard Campana Lee vs. Nerman Fatic
There is no head to head record between Gerard Campana Lee and Nerman Fatic since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Gerard Campana Lee
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 15-17 | 0-0 | 15-17 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-23 | 1-3 | 30-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, the Korean got to the 2nd round after defeating Daniel Dutra Da Silva 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round, Gerard had a good straight sets win against Dutra Da Silva (6-3 6-2). During the match, Campana Lee scored 60 points vs Dutra Da Silva’s 41. The Korean was quite aggressive to blast 17 winners.
Regarding the service games, Campana Lee blasted 2 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Gerard Campana Lee lost the serve twice. Furthermore, Campana Lee put 51% of his first serves in, winning 65% (17/26) of the points behind his 1st serve and 64% (16/25) on the 2nd serve. The Korean broke Dutra Da Silva 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Campana Lee has a losing match record in the last 3 years having won 44% of his matches (12-15). 8-7 on clay in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Campana Lee has an overall11-12 win-loss record in the last 3 years on clay.
Campana Lee’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in M15 Antalya.
The Korean has a composed 9-10 win-loss record in 2023, 8-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Skopje Challenger
Gerard has never competed in this tournament before.
Nerman Fatic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 10-16 | 3-3 | 6-12 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-28 | 0-1 | 35-25 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 34-27 | 0-1 | 31-19 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 37-26 | 1-1 | 30-22 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-3 | 0-0 | 9-1 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 284, will start his run in the Skopje Challenger after he played his last match in the Skopje Challenger where he beat 6-1 ret. to Zekic in the 1st round on the 23rd of May.
Fatic has a composed 6-8 win-loss record in 2023, 6-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
In terms of his career, Fatic has an overall 282-198 record. He has a positive 232-149 record on clay.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Campana Lee | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 7 |
| Pts | 60-41 | 26-14 |
| Total Points | 101 | 40 |
| Winners | 17 | 7 |
| %Winners | 28% | 27% |
Both Campana Lee and Fatic played 1 match. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Campana Lee and Fatic have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Campana Lee played 10 games more than Fatic. Campana Lee scored 17 winners (28% of the total points). On the other side, The Bosnian blasted 7 winners (27%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Campana Lee | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 0 |
| 1st in | 26/51 | 11/20 |
| %1st in | 51% | 55% |
| 1st pts | 17/26 | 7/11 |
| %1st pts | 65% | 64% |
| 2nd pts | 16/25 | 7/9 |
| %2nd pts | 64% | 78% |
Campana Lee blasted 2 aces . Fatic didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Campana Lee won 65% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 64% of the points. On the other side, Fatic won 64% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 78% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Campana Lee | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 3 |
| Converted | 5/7 | 3/3 |
| % Converted | 71% | 100% |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 |
| Saved | 0 | 2 |
| % Saved | 0% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
The Korean broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. The Korean surrendered his serve twice and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. The Bosnian broke his opponent 3 times with a 100% conversion rate. Fatic was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points.
| Campana Lee | |||
| R1 Dutra Da Silva |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 60-41 | 60-41 | |
| Total points | 101 | 101 | |
| Winners | 17 | 17 | |
| %Winners | 28% | 28% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 26/51 | 26/51 | |
| % 1st in | 51% | 51% | |
| 1st pts | 17/26 | 17/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/25 | 16/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 0/2 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Fatic | |||
| Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | |||
| Tot Set | 0 | ||
| Tot Games | 0 | ||
| pts | 0-0 | ||
| Total points | 0 | ||
| Winners | 0 | ||
| %Winners | 0% | ||
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | ||
| Double Faults | 0 | ||
| 1st in | 0/0 | ||
| % 1st in | 0% | ||
| 1st pts | 0/0 | ||
| % 1st pts | 0% | ||
| 2nd pts | 0/0 | ||
| % 2nd pts | 0% | ||
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 0 | ||
| Converted | 0/0 | ||
| Converted % | 0% | ||
| Conceded | 0 | ||
| Saved | 0 | ||
| Saved % | 0% | ||
| Times Broken | 0 | ||
Head 2 Head
LWLLWLWWWL
LLLWLWWWLL Tennis Scores in Skopje Challenger
- Alexander WeisWeis – Nikola MilojevicMilojevic (5-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Mate ValkuszValkusz – Andrew PaulsonPaulson (2-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Dino PrizmicPrizmic – Kalin IvanovskiIvanovski (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Roman Andres BurruchagaAndres Burruchaga – Karol DrzewieckiDrzewiecki (7-5 6-0) – See score progression
- Sumit NagalNagal – Benjamin HassanHassan (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Aziz DougazDougaz – Louis WesselsWessels (3-6 6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Nerman FaticFatic – Miljan ZekicZekic (6-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – James McCabeMcCabe (6-1 4-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Steven DiezDiez – Eduardo RibeiroRibeiro (4-6 6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Max HoukesHoukes – Kacper ZukZuk (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Giovanni FonioFonio – Mili PoljicakPoljicak (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy – Martin LandaluceLandaluce (7-65 7-5) – See score progression
- Gerard Campana LeeCampana Lee – Daniel Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Aziz DougazDougaz – Louis WesselsWessels (3-6 6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Wilson LeiteLeite (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Mate ValkuszValkusz – Andrew PaulsonPaulson (2-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Sumit NagalNagal – Benjamin HassanHassan (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Dragos Nicolae MadarasNicolae Madaras – Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski (7-6(3) 6-1) – See score progression
- Alexander WeisWeis – Nikola MilojevicMilojevic (5-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Roman Andres BurruchagaAndres Burruchaga – Karol DrzewieckiDrzewiecki (7-5 6-0) – See score progression
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – James McCabeMcCabe (6-1 4-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Oliver CrawfordCrawford – Matheus Pucinelli De AlmeidaPucinelli De Almeida (6-3 7-6(7)) – See score progression
- Dino PrizmicPrizmic – Kalin IvanovskiIvanovski (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Nerman FaticFatic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aziz DougazDougaz – Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander WeisWeis – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mate ValkuszValkusz – Sumit NagalNagal (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dragos Nicolae MadarasNicolae Madaras – Steven DiezDiez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – Giovanni FonioFonio (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Max HoukesHoukes – Oliver CrawfordCrawford (0-0) – H2H and prediction
