Yibing Wu and Marco Cecchinato will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Gonet Geneva Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 8:30 pm on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Marco Cecchinato who should win in 2 sets.
Marco Cecchinato -> 1.4
Yibing Wu -> 2.95
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Yibing Wu vs. Marco Cecchinato
There is no head to head record between Yibing Wu and Marco Cecchinato since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Yibing Wu
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 18-17 | 5-7 | 3-5 | 9-1 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
2022 | 40-7 | 20-5 | 10-2 | 10-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 59, Yibing reached the 2nd round after beating Marc-Andrea Huesler 6-4 4-6 7-66.
In the 1st round, The Chinese defeated Huesler (6-4 4-6 7-66).During the match, Wu scored less points (12) than Huesler. In fact, the world no. 59 won 96 points vs Huesler’s. That means that Wu was more focused during the important points. Yibing was exceptionally aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Regarding the service games, Wu scored 3 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Yibing Wu lost the serve 5 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Wu put 57% of his first serves in, winning 61% (39/64) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (24/48) on the 2nd serve. Wu broke Huesler 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Wu has a solid match record in the last 6 years having won 65% of his matches (107-57). 2-3 on clay in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Wu has a composed27-15 win-loss record in the last 6 years on clay.
His best result of the current year was winning the title in Dallas where he overcame John Isner in the final 6-7(4) 7-6(3) 7-6(12).
Yibing has a compiled 14-8 win-loss record in 2023, 2-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Geneva
The Chinese has never competed in this tournament before.
Marco Cecchinato
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 22-19 | 0-2 | 22-17 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 13-23 | 1-4 | 12-17 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 43-33 | 0-3 | 43-30 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 32-27 | 1-5 | 31-19 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2020 | 25-17 | 1-4 | 22-11 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 73, Marco reached the 2nd round after beating Ben Shelton 7-5 2-6 6-2.
In the 1st round, Marco defeated Shelton (7-5 2-6 6-2). During the match Cecchinato scored 91 points vs Shelton’s 82. Cecchinato was extremely aggressive to blast 40 winners.
About the serving games, Cecchinato fired 7 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Marco Cecchinato was extremely effective on serve to win 71% (40/56) of his 1st serve and 52% (13/25) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 3 times. Cecchinato broke Shelton 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
The Italian’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in Estoril.
The Italian has an overall 12-10 win-loss record in 2023, 11-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Geneva
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2021 and 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Wu | Cecchinato |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
Tot Games | 33 | 28 |
Pts | 96-108 | 91-82 |
Total Points | 204 | 173 |
Winners | 39 | 40 |
%Winners | 41% | 44% |
Both Wu and Cecchinato played 1 match. Both players lost a set in the event. Yibing Wu conceded 1 set, while Marco Cecchinato dropped 1 set. Talking about their workload, Wu and Cecchinato have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Wu played 5 games more than Cecchinato. Wu scored 39 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Cecchinato made 40 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Wu | Cecchinato |
---|---|---|
Aces | 3 | 7 |
Avg per match | 3 | 7 |
1st in | 64/112 | 56/81 |
%1st in | 57% | 69% |
1st pts | 39/64 | 40/56 |
%1st pts | 61% | 71% |
2nd pts | 24/48 | 13/25 |
%2nd pts | 50% | 52% |
Wu bagged 3 aces . Cecchinato blasted 7 aces . Wu won 61% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Cecchinato won 71% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Wu | Cecchinato |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 4 |
Converted | 5/7 | 4/11 |
% Converted | 71% | 36% |
Conceded | 8 | 6 |
Saved | 3 | 3 |
% Saved | 38% | 50% |
Times Broken | 5 | 3 |
Wu broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. Wu surrendered his serve 5 times and he saved 38% of the break points that he conceded. Marco broke his opponent 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. Cecchinato conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
Wu | |||
R1 Huesler | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 4-6 7-66 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 33 | 33 | |
pts | 96-108 | 96-108 | |
Total points | 204 | 204 | |
Winners | 39 | 39 | |
%Winners | 41% | 41% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
1st in | 64/112 | 64/112 | |
% 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
1st pts | 39/64 | 39/64 | |
% 1st pts | 61% | 61% | |
2nd pts | 24/48 | 24/48 | |
% 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
Saved | 3/8 | 3 | |
Saved % | 38% | 38% | |
Times Broken | 5 | 5 |
Cecchinato | |||
R1 Shelton | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-5 2-6 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
pts | 91-82 | 91-82 | |
Total points | 173 | 173 | |
Winners | 40 | 40 | |
%Winners | 44% | 44% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 7 | 7 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
1st in | 56/81 | 56/81 | |
% 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
1st pts | 40/56 | 40/56 | |
% 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
2nd pts | 13/25 | 13/25 | |
% 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/11 | 4/11 | |
Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
Saved | 3/6 | 3 | |
Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Tennis Scores in Geneva
- Nicolas JarryJarry – Dusan LajovicLajovic (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Yibing WuWu – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (6-4 4-6 7-66) – See score progression
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Daniel RinconRincon (6-4 4-6 6-0) – See score progression
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – Filip KrajinovicKrajinovic (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Nikola Mektic/Mate PavicMektic/Mate Pavic – Julian Cash/Henry PattenCash/Henry Patten (7-64 6-3) – See score progression
- Marcos GironGiron – Alexander BublikBublik (6-0 6-4) – See score progression
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Ben SheltonShelton (7-5 2-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Benoit PairePaire (7-62 6-3) – See score progression
- Marcos GironGiron – Alexander BublikBublik (6-0 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Guido PellaPella – Ilya IvashkaIvashka (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo DellienDellien – Jeff WolfWolf (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marcos GironGiron – Taylor Harry FritzHarry Fritz (1-5) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Grigor DimitrovDimitrov (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander ZverevZverev – Christopher EubanksEubanks (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Christopher O ConnellO Connell (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yibing WuWu – Marco CecchinatoCecchinato (0-0) – H2H and prediction