Damir Dzumhur and Jesper De Jong will square off in the quarter of the Tunis Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 3:30 pm on COURT AZIZ ZOUHIR. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jesper De Jong who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jesper De Jong is the pick to win this match.
Jesper De Jong -> 1.33
Damir Dzumhur -> 3.18
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Damir Dzumhur vs. Jesper De Jong
There is no head to head record between Damir Dzumhur and Jesper De Jong since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Damir Dzumhur
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 29-17 | 6-8 | 17-5 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-34 | 15-5 | 18-18 | 8-9 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 34-28 | 5-5 | 19-12 | 10-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 32-32 | 6-6 | 17-17 | 6-6 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 18-15 | 4-7 | 6-4 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 172, the Bosnian reached the quarter after beating Aziz Ouakaa 1-6 6-0 6-2 and Dennis Novak 6-4 6-0.
In the 2nd round, Dzumhur had a good straight sets win against Novak (6-4 6-0). During the match, Dzumhur scored 69 points vs Novak’s 46. Dzumhur was quite aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Regarding the service games, Dzumhur blasted 2 aces and he was exceptionally solid in conceding no double faults. Damir Dzumhur lost the serve once and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Dzumhur put 80% of his first serves in, winning 67% (29/43) of the points behind his 1st serve and 55% (6/11) on the 2nd serve. Damir broke Novak 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Bosnian has lost 1 set in this tournament to conquer 57% of the points he played.
Dzumhur has winning record in the last 10 years having won 55% of his matches (333-267). 10-7 on clay in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Dzumhur has a compiled 153-106 match record in the last years on clay.
The Bosnian’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in the Vilnius Challenger.
Dzumhur has an overall 18-13 win-loss record in 2023, 10-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tunis Challenger
Damir has never competed in this tournament before.
Jesper De Jong
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-16 | 7-3 | 20-10 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 52-23 | 19-4 | 30-14 | 0-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-28 | 12-7 | 10-13 | 2-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 32-29 | 2-6 | 27-18 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 31-12 | 7-3 | 14-5 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 210, the Dutch got to the quarter after beating Charles Broom 6-2 6-3, Arthur Gea 6-3 6-2, Pablo Cuevas 7-60 2-1 ret. and Alexander Weis 6-4 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Jesper had a good straight sets win against Weis (6-4 6-3). During the match De scored 70 points vs Weis’s 53. Jesper was quite aggressive to blast 24 winners.
About the serving games, De blasted 3 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Jesper De Jong was pretty efficient on serve to win 73% (24/33) of his 1st serve and 69% (18/26) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Dutch broke Weis 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Dutch started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t lost yet a set in this competition to win 58% of the points he played.
De’s best result of the season was getting to the final in the Tigre 2 Challenger,M25 Quinta Do Lago and the Rome Challenger.
Jesper has an aggregate 35-11 win-loss record in 2023, 25-9 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Dzumhur | De |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 37 | 69 |
| Pts | 151-114 | 260-194 |
| Total Points | 265 | 454 |
| Winners | 65 | 93 |
| %Winners | 43% | 36% |
Dzumhur played 2 matches while De competed in 4 matches. De started his run from the qualifications while Dzumhur had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Damir Dzumhur lost 1 set while Jesper De Jong hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Dzumhur has played 4 set(s) less than De (5 vs 9). Therefore, Dzumhur played 32 games less than De. Damir scored 65 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, De blasted 93 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Dzumhur | De |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 2 |
| 1st in | 98/135 | 136/238 |
| %1st in | 73% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 65/98 | 93/136 |
| %1st pts | 66% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 16/37 | 59/102 |
| %2nd pts | 43% | 58% |
Dzumhur bagged 4 aces (2 per match). De recorded 8 aces (2 per match). Dzumhur won 66% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 43% of the points. On the other side, De won 68% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Dzumhur | De |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 11 | 16 |
| Converted | 11/24 | 16/29 |
| % Converted | 46% | 55% |
| Conceded | 17 | 26 |
| Saved | 13 | 19 |
| % Saved | 76% | 73% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 7 |
The Bosnian broke his opponents 11 times with a 46% conversion rate. The Bosnian surrendered his serve 4 times and he saved 76% of the break points that he conceded. The Dutch broke his opponents 16 times with a 55% conversion rate. De conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded.
| Dzumhur | ||||
| R1 Ouakaa |
R2 Novak |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 1-6 6-0 6-2 | 6-4 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 16 | 37 | |
| pts | 82-68 | 69-46 | 151-114 | |
| Total points | 150 | 115 | 265 | |
| Winners | 36 | 29 | 65 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 42% | 43% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 0 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 55/81 | 43/54 | 98/135 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 80% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 36/55 | 29/43 | 65/98 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 67% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/26 | 6/11 | 16/37 | |
| % 2nd pts | 38% | 55% | 43% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 6 | 5 | 11 | |
| Converted | 6/14 | 5/10 | 11/24 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 50% | 46% | |
| Conceded | 13 | 4 | 17 | |
| Saved | 10/13 | 3/4 | 13 | |
| Saved % | 77% | 75% | 76% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
| De | ||||||
| Q1 Broom |
Q3 Gea |
R1 Cuevas |
R2 Weis |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | 6-3 6-2 | 7-60 2-1 ret. | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | 16 | 19 | 69 | |
| pts | 66-49 | 73-47 | 51-45 | 70-53 | 260-194 | |
| Total points | 115 | 120 | 96 | 123 | 454 | |
| Winners | 30 | 20 | 19 | 24 | 93 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 27% | 37% | 34% | 36% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 13 | |
| 1st in | 43/70 | 31/58 | 29/51 | 33/59 | 136/238 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 53% | 57% | 56% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 30/43 | 20/31 | 19/29 | 24/33 | 93/136 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 65% | 66% | 73% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/27 | 18/27 | 9/22 | 18/26 | 59/102 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 67% | 41% | 69% | 58% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 4 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 16 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 5/14 | 4/5 | 3/5 | 16/29 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 36% | 80% | 60% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 6 | 7 | 3 | 26 | |
| Saved | 9/10 | 4/6 | 4/7 | 2/3 | 19 | |
| Saved % | 90% | 67% | 57% | 67% | 141% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLLWWWWW
LWWWWWWLWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Jesper De JongDe Jong (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Borna GojoGojo – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aziz DougazDougaz – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
