Jesper De Jong and Alexander Weis will play each other in the 2nd round of the Tunis Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 2:00 pm on COURT 5. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jesper De Jong who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jesper De Jong is the pick to win this match.
Jesper De Jong -> 1.27
Alexander Weis -> 3.5
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jesper De Jong vs. Alexander Weis
There is no head to head record between Jesper De Jong and Alexander Weis since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Jesper De Jong
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-16 | 7-3 | 20-10 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 52-23 | 19-4 | 30-14 | 0-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-28 | 12-7 | 10-13 | 2-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 32-29 | 2-6 | 27-18 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 31-12 | 7-3 | 14-5 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 210, De Jong got to the 2nd round after defeating Charles Broom 6-2 6-3, Arthur Gea 6-3 6-2 and Pablo Cuevas 7-60 2-1 ret..
In the 1st round against Cuevas, the Dutch had a free pass after Cuevas retired on a 7-60 2-1 . scoreline.
De Jong has a solid match record in the last 7 years having won 63% of his matches (187-110). 24-9 on clay in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, De Jong has a composed106-58 match record in the last 7 years on clay.
Jesper’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in the Tigre 2 Challenger,M25 Quinta Do Lago and the Rome Challenger.
Jesper has an aggregate 34-11 win-loss record in 2023, 24-9 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tunis Challenger
Jesper has never competed in this tournament before.
Alexander Weis
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18-20 | 0-0 | 18-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 51-37 | 0-2 | 51-33 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 58-30 | 2-3 | 55-24 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 49-31 | 0-0 | 49-30 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 13-9 | 0-0 | 13-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 338 (career-high), the Italian got to the 2nd round after beating Antoine Hoang 6-4 6-4, Nicolas Mejia 6-4 6-3 and Liam Broady 6-0 5-7 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Italian defeated Broady (6-0 5-7 6-3). During the match Weis scored 95 points vs Broady’s 84. Alexander was pretty aggressive to blast 38 winners.
About the serving games, Weis scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 5 double faults. Alexander Weis lost the serve 3 times and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Weis put 67% of his first serves in, winning 68% (38/56) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (12/28) on the 2nd serve. The Italian broke Broady 7 times after converting 50% of his break points (7/14).
Weis’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in M15 Antalya and M25 Santa Margherita di Pula.
The Italian has an overall 17-16 win-loss record in 2023, 17-12 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | De Jong | Weis |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 50 | 66 |
| Pts | 190-141 | 226-190 |
| Total Points | 331 | 416 |
| Winners | 69 | 90 |
| %Winners | 36% | 40% |
Both De Jong and Weis played 3 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Alexander Weis surrendered 1 set while Jesper De Jong hasn’t lost a set so far. Talking about their workload, De Jong and Weis have played the same amount of sets 7. However, De Jong played 16 games less than Weis. Jesper scored 69 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, The Italian managed to score 90 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | De Jong | Weis |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 1.7 | 1.3 |
| 1st in | 103/179 | 126/210 |
| %1st in | 58% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 69/103 | 90/126 |
| %1st pts | 67% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 41/76 | 42/84 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 50% |
De Jong fired 5 aces (1.7 per match). Weis managed to score 4 aces (1.3 per match). De Jong won 67% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Weis won 71% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | De Jong | Weis |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 13 | 14 |
| Converted | 13/24 | 14/26 |
| % Converted | 54% | 54% |
| Conceded | 23 | 18 |
| Saved | 17 | 12 |
| % Saved | 74% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 6 | 6 |
De Jong broke his opponents 13 times with a 54% conversion rate. Jesper surrendered his serve 6 times and he saved 74% of the break points that he conceded. The Italian broke his opponents 14 times with a 54% conversion rate. Alexander conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| De Jong | |||||
| Q1 Broom |
Q3 Gea |
R1 Cuevas |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | 6-3 6-2 | 7-60 2-1 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | 16 | 50 | |
| pts | 66-49 | 73-47 | 51-45 | 190-141 | |
| Total points | 115 | 120 | 96 | 331 | |
| Winners | 30 | 20 | 19 | 69 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 27% | 37% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 3 | 4 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 43/70 | 31/58 | 29/51 | 103/179 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 53% | 57% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 30/43 | 20/31 | 19/29 | 69/103 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 65% | 66% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/27 | 18/27 | 9/22 | 41/76 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 67% | 41% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 5 | 4 | 13 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 5/14 | 4/5 | 13/24 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 36% | 80% | 54% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 6 | 7 | 23 | |
| Saved | 9/10 | 4/6 | 4/7 | 17 | |
| Saved % | 90% | 67% | 57% | 71% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | |
| Weis | |||||
| Q1 Hoang |
Q3 Mejia |
R1 Broady |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | 6-4 6-3 | 6-0 5-7 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 19 | 27 | 66 | |
| pts | 70-57 | 61-49 | 95-84 | 226-190 | |
| Total points | 127 | 110 | 179 | 416 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | 38 | 90 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 43% | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 5 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 35/67 | 35/59 | 56/84 | 126/210 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 59% | 67% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 26/35 | 26/35 | 38/56 | 90/126 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | 68% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/32 | 12/24 | 12/28 | 42/84 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 50% | 43% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 7 | 14 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 4/8 | 7/14 | 14/26 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 50% | 50% | 54% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 3 | 10 | 18 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 1/3 | 7/10 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 33% | 70% | 61% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWWWLWL
LLWWWWLWLL Tennis Scores in Tunis Challenger
- Borna GojoGojo – Nicolas MejiaMejia (6-4 7-64) – See score progression
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Joao SousaSousa (6-3 5-7 6-4) – See score progression
- Aziz DougazDougaz – Malek JaziriJaziri (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Aziz OuakaaOuakaa (1-6 6-0 6-2) – See score progression
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Pablo CuevasCuevas (7-60 2-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Alejandro TabiloTabilo (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Damien WengerWenger (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante – Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Dennis NovakNovak – Gilles Arnaud BaillyArnaud Bailly (2-6 6-3 7-63) – See score progression
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri (6-72 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Tomas Barrios VeraBarrios Vera – Matteo GiganteGigante (6-1 1-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Daniel RinconRincon – Joris De LooreDe Loore (4-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Alexander WeisWeis – Liam BroadyBroady (6-0 5-7 6-3) – See score progression
- Jakub MensikMensik – Laurent LokoliLokoli (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel – Mattia BellucciBellucci (7-65 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Dennis NovakNovak (2-3) – H2H and prediction
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Borna GojoGojo – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante – Aziz DougazDougaz (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Alexander WeisWeis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
