Radu Albot and Jan Choinski will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Oeiras 4 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 10:00 am on COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Radu Albot who should win in 3 sets.
Radu Albot -> 1.666
Jan Choinski -> 2.12
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Radu Albot vs. Jan Choinski
There is no head to head record between Radu Albot and Jan Choinski since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Radu Albot
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 28-19 | 3-3 | 17-11 | 4-3 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
2023 | 39-34 | 10-13 | 13-8 | 12-10 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
2022 | 40-30 | 25-14 | 4-6 | 3-5 | 8-5 | 0-0 |
2021 | 22-27 | 4-9 | 2-8 | 13-6 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
2020 | 9-18 | 0-8 | 2-4 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 112, Radu reached the 2nd round after beating Adrian Andreev 6-1 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Moldovan had a good straight sets win against Andreev (6-1 6-3). During the match, Albot scored 62 points vs Andreev’s 39. The Moldovan was extremely aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about the service games, Albot scored just 1 ace throughout the match and he committed only 4 double faults. Radu Albot was extremely efficient on serve to win 75% (21/28) of his 1st serve and 67% (16/24) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Moldovan broke Andreev 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Albot has winning win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 55% of his matches (338-280). 8-5 on clay in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Albot has an aggregate 110-91 record in the last years on clay.
The Moldovan’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in Delray Beach.
The Moldovan has a composed 16-16 win-loss record in 2023, 8-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Oeiras 4 Challenger
Albot has never competed in this tournament before.
Jan Choinski
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 14-21 | 1-2 | 10-8 | 3-7 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 41-35 | 1-4 | 30-19 | 5-5 | 2-5 | 3-2 |
2022 | 46-21 | 5-5 | 35-14 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 179, Choinski got to the 2nd round after beating Alessandro Giannessi 6-3 4-6 6-4.
In the 1st round, Jan defeated Giannessi (6-3 4-6 6-4). During the match Choinski scored 89 points vs Giannessi’s 75. The German was quite aggressive to blast 43 winners.
Talking about serving, Choinski recorded 5 aces and he was extremely solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Jan Choinski was extremely efficient on serve to win 72% (43/60) of his 1st serve and 66% (21/32) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The German broke Giannessi 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Jan’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in M25 Nussloch,the Cherbourg Challenger,the Mexico City Challenger and the San Luis Potosi Challenger.
Choinski has a compiled 22-14 win-loss record in 2023, 13-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Albot | Choinski |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
Tot Games | 16 | 29 |
Pts | 62-39 | 89-75 |
Total Points | 101 | 164 |
Winners | 21 | 43 |
%Winners | 34% | 48% |
Both Albot and Choinski played 1 match. At the moment, Jan Choinski conceded 1 set while Radu Albot hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Albot has played 1 set(s) less than Choinski (2 vs 3). Therefore, Albot played 13 games less than Choinski. The Moldovan scored 21 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, Choinski struck 43 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Albot | Choinski |
---|---|---|
Aces | 1 | 5 |
Avg per match | 1 | 5 |
1st in | 28/52 | 60/92 |
%1st in | 54% | 65% |
1st pts | 21/28 | 43/60 |
%1st pts | 75% | 72% |
2nd pts | 16/24 | 21/32 |
%2nd pts | 67% | 66% |
Albot struck 1 ace . Choinski also scored 5 aces . Albot won 75% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 67% of the points. On the other side, Choinski won 72% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 66% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Albot | Choinski |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 3 |
Converted | 4/5 | 3/5 |
% Converted | 80% | 60% |
Conceded | 2 | 11 |
Saved | 2 | 9 |
% Saved | 100% | 82% |
Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Radu broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. Radu was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points. The German broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. The German conceded his serve twice and he saved 82% of the break points that he conceded.
Albot | |||
R1 Andreev | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
pts | 62-39 | 62-39 | |
Total points | 101 | 101 | |
Winners | 21 | 21 | |
%Winners | 34% | 34% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 1 | 1 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
1st in | 28/52 | 28/52 | |
% 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
1st pts | 21/28 | 21/28 | |
% 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
2nd pts | 16/24 | 16/24 | |
% 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Choinski | |||
R1 Giannessi | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
pts | 89-75 | 89-75 | |
Total points | 164 | 164 | |
Winners | 43 | 43 | |
%Winners | 48% | 48% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 5 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 60/92 | 60/92 | |
% 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
1st pts | 43/60 | 43/60 | |
% 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
2nd pts | 21/32 | 21/32 | |
% 2nd pts | 66% | 66% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
Saved | 9/11 | 9 | |
Saved % | 82% | 82% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Tennis Scores in Oeiras 4 Challenger
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi (6-3 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh – Facundo BagnisBagnis (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Ulises BlanchBlanch – Pedro SousaSousa (6-2 7-64) – See score progression
- Pedro CachinCachin – Eduardo RibeiroRibeiro (5-7 7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Mate ValkuszValkusz – Emilio GomezGomez (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva (7-63 6-3) – See score progression
- Steve JohnsonJohnson – Rinky HijikataHijikata (1-6 7-63 6-1) – See score progression
- Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero – Hugo GastonGaston (6-3 3-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Gerard Campana LeeCampana Lee – Manuel GuinardGuinard (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Adrian AndreevAndreev (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Felipe Meligeni AlvesMeligeni Alves – Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran – Federico DelbonisDelbonis (6-2 2-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Alexander RitschardRitschard – Martin LandaluceLandaluce (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Hugo DellienDellien – Ivan GakhovGakhov (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – Emilio NavaNava (6-1 7-63) – See score progression
- Pedro CachinCachin – Eduardo RibeiroRibeiro (5-7 7-6(5) 6-3) – See score progression
- Steve JohnsonJohnson – Rinky HijikataHijikata (1-6 7-6(3) 6-1) – See score progression
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi (6-3 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Ulises BlanchBlanch – Pedro SousaSousa (6-2 7-6(4)) – See score progression
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva (7-6(3) 6-3) – See score progression
- Gerard Campana LeeCampana Lee – Manuel GuinardGuinard (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Mate ValkuszValkusz – Emilio GomezGomez (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh – Facundo BagnisBagnis (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Felipe Meligeni AlvesMeligeni Alves – Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Joao DominguesDomingues (4-6 6-0 6-2) – See score progression
- Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero – Hugo GastonGaston (6-3 3-0 ret.) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander RitschardRitschard – Mate ValkuszValkusz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro CachinCachin – Hugo DellienDellien (3-3) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran – Steve JohnsonJohnson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ulises BlanchBlanch – Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh – Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves (0-0) – H2H and prediction