Arthur Gea and Jesper De Jong will face off in the qualifications of the Tunis Challenger for the 1^st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:00 pm on COURT 5. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jesper De Jong who should win in 2 sets.

As per the initial odds, Jesper De Jong is the pick to win this match.
Jesper De Jong -> 1.094
Arthur Gea -> 6.25

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

Prediction and head to head Arthur Gea vs. Jesper De Jong

There is no head to head record between Arthur Gea and Jesper De Jong since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.

Arthur Gea

Currently unranked, the French player reached the qualifications after beating Viktor Durasovic 7-5 6-3.

In the qualifications, The French player had a good straight sets win against Durasovic (7-5 6-3). During the match, Gea scored 72 points vs Durasovic’s 60. Gea was pretty aggressive to blast 22 winners.

Regarding the service games, Gea wasn’t able to score even 1 ace during the match and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Arthur Gea was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 85% (22/26) of his 1st serve and 51% (18/35) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The French player broke Durasovic 4 times after converting 33% of his break points (4/12).

Gea has a winning win-loss record in the last 3 years having won 53% of his matches (18-16). 12-6 on clay in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Gea has an overall13-10 record in the last 3 years on clay.

The French player has a composed 13-7 win-loss record in 2023, 12-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Tunis Challenger

Gea has never competed in this tournament before.

Jesper De Jong

Ranked no. 210, Jesper got to the qualifications after beating Charles Broom 6-2 6-3.

In the qualifications, De had a good straight sets win against Broom (6-2 6-3). During the match De scored 66 points vs Broom’s 49. De was extremely aggressive to blast 30 winners.

About the serving games, De scored 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Jesper De Jong lost the serve once and he saved 9 break points. Furthermore, De put 61% of his first serves in, winning 70% (30/43) of the points behind his 1st serve and 52% (14/27) on the 2nd serve. Jesper broke Broom 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).

The Dutch’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the Tigre 2 Challenger,M25 Quinta Do Lago and the Rome Challenger.

Jesper has an aggregate 32-11 win-loss record in 2023, 22-9 on clay (See FULL STATS).

H2H Performance in the tournament

Matches, sets, games and points

Points	Gea	De
Match played	1	1
Tot Set	2	2
Tot Games	21	17
Pts	72-60	66-49
Total Points	132	115
Winners	22	30
%Winners	31%	45%

Both Gea and De played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Gea and De have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Gea played 4 games more than De. Gea scored 22 winners (31% of the total points). On the other side, The Dutch fired 30 winners (45%).

Serve Performance

Serve	Gea	De
Aces	0	2
Avg per match	0	2
1st in	26/61	43/70
%1st in	43%	61%
1st pts	22/26	30/43
%1st pts	85%	70%
2nd pts	18/35	14/27
%2nd pts	51%	52%

Gea didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. De fired 2 aces . Gea won 85% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 51% of the points. On the other side, De won 70% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks	Gea	De
Won	4	4
Converted	4/12	4/5
% Converted	33%	80%
Conceded	2	10
Saved	0	9
% Saved	0%	90%
Times Broken	2	1

Arthur broke his opponent 4 times with a 33% conversion rate. Gea lost his serve twice and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. De broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. The Dutch conceded his serve once and he saved 90% of the break points that he conceded.

Gea
	Q1 Durasovic	Total
Score	7-5 6-3
Tot Set	2	2
Tot Games	21	21
pts	72-60	72-60
Total points	132	132
Winners	22	22
%Winners	31%	31%
SERVE
Aces	0	0
Double Faults	4	4
1st in	26/61	26/61
% 1st in	43%	43%
1st pts	22/26	22/26
% 1st pts	85%	85%
2nd pts	18/35	18/35
% 2nd pts	51%	51%
Breaks
Won	4	4
Converted	4/12	4/12
Converted %	33%	33%
Conceded	2	2
Saved	0/2	0
Saved %	0%	0%
Times Broken	2	2

De
	Q1 Broom	Total
Score	6-2 6-3
Tot Set	2	2
Tot Games	17	17
pts	66-49	66-49
Total points	115	115
Winners	30	30
%Winners	45%	45%
SERVE
Aces	2	2
Double Faults	2	2
1st in	43/70	43/70
% 1st in	61%	61%
1st pts	30/43	30/43
% 1st pts	70%	70%
2nd pts	14/27	14/27
% 2nd pts	52%	52%
Breaks
Won	4	4
Converted	4/5	4/5
Converted %	80%	80%
Conceded	10	10
Saved	9/10	9
Saved %	90%	90%
Times Broken	1	1

Upcoming matches in the draw

• Malek JaziriJaziri – Aziz DougazDougaz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Aziz OuakaaOuakaa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Nicolas KickerKicker – Liam BroadyBroady (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Dennis NovakNovak – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Maximilian MartererMarterer – Alejandro TabiloTabilo (0-1) – H2H and prediction
• Hady HabibHabib – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Nicolas MejiaMejia – Alexander WeisWeis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Joao SousaSousa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Max HoukesHoukes (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Jesper De JongDe Jong – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel – (0-0) – H2H and prediction