![Prediction And Head To Head Dennis Novak Vs. Hamad Medjedovic Wr9rc2ea3h Prediction and head to head Dennis Novak vs. Hamad Medjedovic](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Dennis-Novak-vs.-Hamad-Medjedovic-Wr9rc2ea3h.jpg)
Dennis Novak and Hamad Medjedovic will square off in the quarter of the Mauthausen Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 1:30 pm on COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Hamad Medjedovic who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Hamad Medjedovic is the pick to win this match.
Hamad Medjedovic -> 1.88
Dennis Novak -> 1.88
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Dennis Novak vs. Hamad Medjedovic
There is no head to head record between Dennis Novak and Hamad Medjedovic since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Dennis Novak
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 14-16 | 5-5 | 9-9 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 38-23 | 12-3 | 12-10 | 10-8 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 33-27 | 2-2 | 21-14 | 6-9 | 4-1 | 0-1 |
2021 | 26-29 | 1-3 | 9-12 | 14-11 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 16-14 | 8-6 | 0-2 | 8-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 174, Dennis got to the quarter after defeating Harold Mayot 2-6 6-3 6-2 and Sandro Kopp 7-5 3-6 6-3.
In the 2nd round, The Austrian defeated Kopp (7-5 3-6 6-3). During the match, Novak scored 91 points vs Kopp’s 86. The Austrian was very aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Talking about the service games, Novak recorded 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Dennis Novak lost the serve 4 times and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Novak put 66% of his first serves in, winning 67% (36/54) of the points behind his 1st serve and 54% (15/28) on the 2nd serve. Dennis broke Kopp 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Austrian has surrendered 2 set in this tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
Novak has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 64% of his matches (387-221). 2-0 on clay in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Novak has an aggregate 211-117 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
His best result of the current year was winning the title the Nonthaburi 1 Challenger where he overcame Tung-Lin Wu in the final 6-4 6-4.
The Austrian has an aggregate 13-4 win-loss record in 2023, 2-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Mauthausen Challenger
Hamad Medjedovic
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 14-9 | 1-3 | 11-4 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
2023 | 48-23 | 10-5 | 22-9 | 11-7 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 46-24 | 12-10 | 28-6 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 13-13 | 0-0 | 13-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 214, the Serbian got to the quarter after defeating Lucas Gerch 6-1 6-3 and Alexander Ritschard 6-3 6-1.
In the 2nd round, Hamad had a good straight sets win against Ritschard (6-3 6-1). During the match Medjedovic scored 66 points vs Ritschard’s 43. Hamad was pretty aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about serving, Medjedovic managed to score 6 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Hamad Medjedovic lost the serve twice and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Medjedovic put 57% of his first serves in, winning 70% (26/37) of the points behind his 1st serve and 39% (11/28) on the 2nd serve. Medjedovic broke Ritschard 6 times after converting 75% of his break points (6/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Medjedovic hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 59% of the points he played.
His best result of the year was winning the title the Szekesfehervar Challenger where he beat Nino Serdarusic in the final 6-4 6-3.
The Serbian has a compiled 16-10 win-loss record in 2023, 9-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Mauthausen Challenger
Hamad has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Novak | Medjedovic |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 2 |
Tot Set | 6 | 4 |
Tot Games | 55 | 32 |
Pts | 176-159 | 130-90 |
Total Points | 335 | 220 |
Winners | 75 | 53 |
%Winners | 43% | 41% |
Both Novak and Medjedovic played 2 matches. At the moment, Dennis Novak conceded 2 sets while Hamad Medjedovic hasn’t dropped a set so far. Novak has played 2 sets more than Medjedovic (6 vs 4). Therefore, Novak played 23 games more than Medjedovic. The Austrian scored 75 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, The Serbian recorded 53 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Novak | Medjedovic |
---|---|---|
Aces | 4 | 9 |
Avg per match | 2 | 4.5 |
1st in | 110/166 | 74/127 |
%1st in | 66% | 58% |
1st pts | 75/110 | 53/74 |
%1st pts | 68% | 72% |
2nd pts | 29/56 | 20/53 |
%2nd pts | 52% | 38% |
Novak fired 4 aces (2 per match). Medjedovic fired 9 aces (4.5 per match). Novak won 68% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Medjedovic won 72% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 38% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Novak | Medjedovic |
---|---|---|
Won | 9 | 12 |
Converted | 9/21 | 12/17 |
% Converted | 43% | 71% |
Conceded | 16 | 15 |
Saved | 9 | 11 |
% Saved | 56% | 73% |
Times Broken | 7 | 4 |
The Austrian broke his opponents 9 times with a 43% conversion rate. The Austrian dropped his serve 7 times and he saved 56% of the break points that he conceded. Hamad broke his opponents 12 times with a 71% conversion rate. Medjedovic conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded.
Novak | ||||
R1 Mayot |
R2 Kopp |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 2-6 6-3 6-2 | 7-5 3-6 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
Tot Games | 25 | 30 | 55 | |
pts | 85-73 | 91-86 | 176-159 | |
Total points | 158 | 177 | 335 | |
Winners | 39 | 36 | 75 | |
%Winners | 46% | 40% | 43% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 1 | 5 | |
1st in | 56/84 | 54/82 | 110/166 | |
% 1st in | 67% | 66% | 66% | |
1st pts | 39/56 | 36/54 | 75/110 | |
% 1st pts | 70% | 67% | 68% | |
2nd pts | 14/28 | 15/28 | 29/56 | |
% 2nd pts | 50% | 54% | 52% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 4 | 5 | 9 | |
Converted | 4/11 | 5/10 | 9/21 | |
Converted % | 36% | 50% | 43% | |
Conceded | 11 | 5 | 16 | |
Saved | 8/11 | 1/5 | 9 | |
Saved % | 73% | 20% | 47% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 4 | 7 |
Medjedovic | ||||
R1 Gerch |
R2 Ritschard |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 6-3 | 6-3 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 16 | 32 | |
pts | 64-47 | 66-43 | 130-90 | |
Total points | 111 | 109 | 220 | |
Winners | 27 | 26 | 53 | |
%Winners | 42% | 39% | 41% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 3 | 6 | 9 | |
Double Faults | 5 | 5 | 10 | |
1st in | 37/62 | 37/65 | 74/127 | |
% 1st in | 60% | 57% | 58% | |
1st pts | 27/37 | 26/37 | 53/74 | |
% 1st pts | 73% | 70% | 72% | |
2nd pts | 9/25 | 11/28 | 20/53 | |
% 2nd pts | 36% | 39% | 38% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 6 | 6 | 12 | |
Converted | 6/9 | 6/8 | 12/17 | |
Converted % | 67% | 75% | 71% | |
Conceded | 5 | 10 | 15 | |
Saved | 3/5 | 8/10 | 11 | |
Saved % | 60% | 80% | 70% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 | 4 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Dominic ThiemThiem – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Hugo GastonGaston (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Facundo BagnisBagnis (0-0) – H2H and prediction