Henri Laaksonen and Pablo Llamas Ruiz will play each other in the 2nd round of the Prague 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 4:00 pm on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Pablo Llamas Ruiz who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Pablo Llamas Ruiz is the pick to win this match.
Pablo Llamas Ruiz -> 1.72
Henri Laaksonen -> 2.03
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Henri Laaksonen vs. Pablo Llamas Ruiz
There is no head to head record between Henri Laaksonen and Pablo Llamas Ruiz since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Henri Laaksonen
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 11-23 | 1-2 | 9-16 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 22-35 | 5-12 | 5-11 | 12-9 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 44-25 | 8-5 | 19-10 | 17-9 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 16-15 | 1-3 | 9-6 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
Ranked no. 223, Laaksonen got to the 2nd round after beating Dominic Stricker 7-5 4-6 6-1.
In the 1st round, The Swiss defeated Stricker (7-5 4-6 6-1). During the match, Laaksonen scored 91 points vs Stricker’s 82. Laaksonen was extremely aggressive to blast 46 winners.
Regarding the service games, Laaksonen recorded 2 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Henri Laaksonen was quite efficient on serve to win 73% (46/63) of his 1st serve and 55% (17/31) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Laaksonen broke Stricker 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Laaksonen has favorable match record in the last 10 years having won 54% of his matches (325-278). 2-1 on clay in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Laaksonen has a composed 127-114 match record in the last years on clay.
The Swiss has an overall 4-6 win-loss record in 2023, 2-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Prague 2 Challenger
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 16-16 | 2-5 | 10-8 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-21 | 12-6 | 33-12 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 37-23 | 2-4 | 35-19 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 22-16 | 2-2 | 20-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 9-5 | 2-4 | 7-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 239 (career-high), will start his run in the Prague 2 Challenger after he played his last match in the Prague 2 Challenger where he overcame 6-4 7-5 to Vesely in the 1st round on the 9th of May.
The Spaniard has a composed 23-8 win-loss record in 2023, 18-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Pablo’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M25 Palmanova.
In terms of his career, The Spaniard has an overall 110-65 record. He has a positive 99-52 record on clay.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Laaksonen | Llamas |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 29 | 22 |
| Pts | 91-82 | 66-63 |
| Total Points | 173 | 129 |
| Winners | 46 | 32 |
| %Winners | 51% | 48% |
Both Laaksonen and Llamas played 1 match. At the moment, Henri Laaksonen lost 1 set while Pablo Llamas Ruiz hasn’t dropped a set so far. Laaksonen has played 1 set more than Llamas (3 vs 2). Therefore, Laaksonen played 7 games more than Llamas. Henri scored 46 winners (51% of the total points). On the other side, Pablo managed to score 32 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Laaksonen | Llamas |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 0 |
| 1st in | 63/94 | 47/64 |
| %1st in | 67% | 73% |
| 1st pts | 46/63 | 32/47 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 17/31 | 8/17 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 47% |
Laaksonen fired 2 aces . Llamas didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Laaksonen won 73% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Llamas won 68% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Laaksonen | Llamas |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/9 |
| % Converted | 57% | 44% |
| Conceded | 6 | 3 |
| Saved | 4 | 1 |
| % Saved | 67% | 33% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
The Swiss broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. The Swiss surrendered his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The Spaniard broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. The Spaniard conceded his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded.
| Laaksonen | |||
| R1 Stricker |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 4-6 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 91-82 | 91-82 | |
| Total points | 173 | 173 | |
| Winners | 46 | 46 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 51% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 63/94 | 63/94 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 46/63 | 46/63 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/31 | 17/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Llamas | |||
| Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | |||
| Tot Set | 0 | ||
| Tot Games | 0 | ||
| pts | 0-0 | ||
| Total points | 0 | ||
| Winners | 0 | ||
| %Winners | 0% | ||
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | ||
| Double Faults | 0 | ||
| 1st in | 0/0 | ||
| % 1st in | 0% | ||
| 1st pts | 0/0 | ||
| % 1st pts | 0% | ||
| 2nd pts | 0/0 | ||
| % 2nd pts | 0% | ||
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 0 | ||
| Converted | 0/0 | ||
| Converted % | 0% | ||
| Conceded | 0 | ||
| Saved | 0 | ||
| Saved % | 0% | ||
| Times Broken | 0 | ||
Head 2 Head
LLWLWWWWLL
LLWLWWLLWW Tennis Scores in Prague 2 Challenger
- Nick HardtHardt – Federico GaioGaio (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Akira SantillanSantillan – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Michael GeertsGeerts (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Norbert GombosGombos – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Lukas KleinKlein – Yaroslav DeminDemin (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Gastao EliasElias (1-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Guido AndreozziAndreozzi – Daniel RinconRincon (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Dominic StrickerStricker (7-5 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Zachary SvajdaSvajda – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Pablo Llamas RuizLlamas Ruiz – Jiri VeselyVesely (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Evan FurnessFurness – Zdenek KolarKolar (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas – Billy HarrisHarris (6-2 3-6 6-0) – See score progression
- Jakub MensikMensik – Radu AlbotAlbot (7-64 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Nerman FaticFatic – Dan AddedAdded (5-7 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Nicolas KickerKicker – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (6-3 7-63) – See score progression
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Michael GeertsGeerts (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Nick HardtHardt – Federico GaioGaio (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Akira SantillanSantillan – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Norbert GombosGombos – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas – Billy HarrisHarris (6-2 3-6 6-0) – See score progression
- Zachary SvajdaSvajda – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Gastao EliasElias (1-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Evan FurnessFurness – Zdenek KolarKolar (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Guido AndreozziAndreozzi – Daniel RinconRincon (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Lukas KleinKlein – Yaroslav DeminDemin (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Pablo Llamas RuizLlamas Ruiz – Jiri VeselyVesely (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Dominic StrickerStricker (7-5 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Guido AndreozziAndreozzi – Lukas KleinKlein (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Norbert GombosGombos – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas KickerKicker – Nerman FaticFatic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Evan FurnessFurness (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick HardtHardt – Akira SantillanSantillan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pablo Llamas RuizLlamas Ruiz – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (0-0) – H2H and prediction
