Sumit Nagal and Mirza Basic will play each other in the qualifications of the Mauthausen Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Sumit Nagal who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Sumit Nagal is the pick to win this match.
Sumit Nagal -> 1.37
Mirza Basic -> 2.91
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Sumit Nagal vs. Mirza Basic
There is no head to head record between Sumit Nagal and Mirza Basic since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Sumit Nagal
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 9-13 | 2-3 | 7-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 32-29 | 15-13 | 16-11 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-29 | 9-8 | 32-17 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-18 | 0-1 | 16-17 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-26 | 1-4 | 22-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 347, Sumit got to the qualifications after defeating Mats Moraing 6-0 4-6 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Indian defeated Moraing (6-0 4-6 6-4). During the match, Nagal scored 101 points vs Moraing’s 83. Nagal was extremely aggressive to blast 51 winners.
Talking about the service games, Nagal scored just 1 ace during the encounter and he committed only 4 double faults. Sumit Nagal lost the serve twice and he saved 11 break points. Furthermore, Nagal put 74% of his first serves in, winning 63% (51/81) of the points behind his 1st serve and 54% (15/28) on the 2nd serve. Sumit broke Moraing 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Nagal has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 61% of his matches (272-176). 11-3 on clay in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Nagal has a composed 188-107 match record in the last years on clay.
His best result of the current season was conquering the title the Rome Challenger where he overcame Jesper De Jong in the final 6-3 6-2.
The Indian has an overall 19-10 win-loss record in 2023, 11-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Mauthausen Challenger
The Indian has never competed in this tournament before.
Mirza Basic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 17-10 | 0-0 | 17-9 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 31-23 | 4-7 | 21-13 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 28-19 | 0-1 | 23-12 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 17-29 | 1-6 | 6-11 | 8-9 | 1-2 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 37-27 | 9-7 | 17-13 | 10-5 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
Ranked no. 582, will start his run in the Mauthausen Challenger after he played his last match in the Mauthausen Challenger where he beat 7-6(4) 6-4 to Serdarusic in the qualifications on the 7th of May.
Basic has a compiled 12-9 win-loss record in 2023, 10-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
In terms of his career, Mirza has an overall 443-345 record. He has a positive 133-117 record on clay.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Nagal | Basic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 26 | 23 |
| Pts | 101-83 | 71-64 |
| Total Points | 184 | 135 |
| Winners | 51 | 37 |
| %Winners | 50% | 52% |
Both Nagal and Basic played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Sumit Nagal conceded 1 set while Mirza Basic hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Nagal has played 1 set more than Basic (3 vs 2). Therefore, Nagal played 3 games more than Basic. The Indian scored 51 winners (50% of the total points). On the other side, Mirza managed to score 37 winners (52%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Nagal | Basic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 3 |
| 1st in | 81/109 | 47/64 |
| %1st in | 74% | 73% |
| 1st pts | 51/81 | 37/47 |
| %1st pts | 63% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 15/28 | 10/17 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 59% |
Nagal bagged 1 ace . Basic also bagged 3 aces . Nagal won 63% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Basic won 79% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Nagal | Basic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 2 |
| Converted | 5/7 | 2/5 |
| % Converted | 71% | 40% |
| Conceded | 13 | 2 |
| Saved | 11 | 1 |
| % Saved | 85% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Sumit broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. The Indian lost his serve twice and he saved 85% of the break points that he conceded. Mirza broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. The Bosnian conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Nagal | |||
| Q1 Moraing |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 4-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 101-83 | 101-83 | |
| Total points | 184 | 184 | |
| Winners | 51 | 51 | |
| %Winners | 50% | 50% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 81/109 | 81/109 | |
| % 1st in | 74% | 74% | |
| 1st pts | 51/81 | 51/81 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/28 | 15/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 13 | 13 | |
| Saved | 11/13 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 85% | 85% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Basic | |||
| Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | |||
| Tot Set | 0 | ||
| Tot Games | 0 | ||
| pts | 0-0 | ||
| Total points | 0 | ||
| Winners | 0 | ||
| %Winners | 0% | ||
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | ||
| Double Faults | 0 | ||
| 1st in | 0/0 | ||
| % 1st in | 0% | ||
| 1st pts | 0/0 | ||
| % 1st pts | 0% | ||
| 2nd pts | 0/0 | ||
| % 2nd pts | 0% | ||
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 0 | ||
| Converted | 0/0 | ||
| Converted % | 0% | ||
| Conceded | 0 | ||
| Saved | 0 | ||
| Saved % | 0% | ||
| Times Broken | 0 | ||
Head 2 Head
LWLLLWWLWL
LLWWLLWWLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Lucas GerchGerch (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mirza BasicBasic – Sumit NagalNagal (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico DelbonisDelbonis – Manuel GuinardGuinard (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gerald MelzerMelzer – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist – Facundo BagnisBagnis (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- David PichlerPichler – Marius CopilCopil (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Alexander RitschardRitschard (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Hendrik JebensJebens (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Hugo GastonGaston (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Louis WesselsWessels – David PelPel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sandro KoppKopp – Alexandar LazarovLazarov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adrian AndreevAndreev – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip MisolicMisolic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harold MayotMayot – Dennis NovakNovak (0-0) – H2H and prediction
