Marc Polmans and Jason Jung will play each other in the quarter of the Gwangju Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 11:00 am on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Marc Polmans who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Marc Polmans is the pick to win this match.
Marc Polmans -> 1.533
Jason Jung -> 2.42
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Marc Polmans vs. Jason Jung
This will be the 2nd time that Marc Polmans and Jason Jung face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Jung (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they competed against each other, Jung won 5-7 6-4 6-4 in the quarter in the Vancouver Challenger back in 2019.
Marc Polmans
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 16-24 | 10-15 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
2023 | 50-35 | 32-23 | 14-9 | 2-1 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 18-13 | 14-12 | 0-0 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 15-28 | 1-6 | 8-13 | 2-6 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 11-16 | 2-6 | 5-4 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 209, Marc got to the quarter after beating Yuta Shimizu 2-6 7-5 6-4 and James Duckworth 6-3 7-65.
In the 2nd round, Polmans had a good straight sets win against Duckworth (6-3 7-65). During the match, Polmans scored 67 points vs Duckworth’s 52. The Australian was very aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about the service games, Polmans blasted 8 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Marc Polmans was quite effective on serve to win 84% (27/32) of his 1st serve and 71% (15/21) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Polmans broke Duckworth 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Marc has dropped 1 set in this event to win 52% of the points he played.
Polmans has good record in the last 10 years having won 57% of his matches (280-212). 10-7 on hard in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Polmans has an overall 157-120 match record in the last years on hard.
Polmans’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Canberra.
Polmans has a compiled 23-10 win-loss record in 2023, 10-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Gwangju Challenger
Jason Jung
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 42-25 | 40-23 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 25-28 | 13-14 | 2-5 | 4-4 | 6-5 | 0-0 |
2021 | 12-25 | 5-12 | 1-4 | 2-6 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 16-18 | 7-8 | 2-4 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 338, Jason reached the quarter after beating Makoto Ochi 6-4 7-67, Hiroki Moriya 6-3 7-66, Denis Kudla 6-3 6-71 6-3 and Yunseong Chung 3-6 6-3 6-4.
In the 2nd round against Chung, Jason recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-3 6-4). During the match Jung scored 91 points vs Chung’s 81. Jason was very aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about serving, Jung fired 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Jason Jung lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Jung put 66% of his first serves in, winning 70% (38/54) of the points behind his 1st serve and 61% (17/28) on the 2nd serve. Jung broke Chung 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Chinese started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
Jason’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in the Nonthaburi 2 Challenger.
Jung has a composed 16-9 win-loss record in 2023, 16-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Gwangju Challenger
Previously, he won this tournament once in 2019. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Polmans | Jung |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 4 |
Tot Set | 5 | 10 |
Tot Games | 52 | 104 |
Pts | 171-159 | 362-325 |
Total Points | 330 | 687 |
Winners | 76 | 153 |
%Winners | 44% | 42% |
Polmans played 2 matches while Jung competed in 4 matches. Jung started his run from the qualifications while Polmans had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Marc Polmans dropped 1 set, while Jason Jung dropped 2 sets. Polmans has played 5 set(s) less than Jung (5 vs 10). Therefore, Polmans played 52 games less than Jung. Marc scored 76 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, The Chinese struck 153 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Polmans | Jung |
---|---|---|
Aces | 11 | 16 |
Avg per match | 5.5 | 4 |
1st in | 107/176 | 220/341 |
%1st in | 61% | 65% |
1st pts | 76/107 | 153/220 |
%1st pts | 71% | 70% |
2nd pts | 35/69 | 74/121 |
%2nd pts | 51% | 61% |
Polmans bagged 11 aces (5.5 per match). Jung bagged 16 aces (4 per match). Polmans won 71% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 51% of the points. On the other side, Jung won 70% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Polmans | Jung |
---|---|---|
Won | 7 | 12 |
Converted | 7/11 | 12/22 |
% Converted | 64% | 55% |
Conceded | 15 | 22 |
Saved | 10 | 15 |
% Saved | 67% | 68% |
Times Broken | 5 | 7 |
Marc broke his opponents 7 times with a 64% conversion rate. Marc surrendered his serve 5 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Jason broke his opponents 12 times with a 55% conversion rate. The Chinese conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 68% of the break points that he conceded.
Polmans | ||||
R1 Shimizu |
R2 Duckworth |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 2-6 7-5 6-4 | 6-3 7-65 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 30 | 22 | 52 | |
pts | 104-107 | 67-52 | 171-159 | |
Total points | 211 | 119 | 330 | |
Winners | 49 | 27 | 76 | |
%Winners | 47% | 40% | 44% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 3 | 8 | 11 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 2 | 6 | |
1st in | 75/123 | 32/53 | 107/176 | |
% 1st in | 61% | 60% | 61% | |
1st pts | 49/75 | 27/32 | 76/107 | |
% 1st pts | 65% | 84% | 71% | |
2nd pts | 20/48 | 15/21 | 35/69 | |
% 2nd pts | 42% | 71% | 51% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
Converted | 4/6 | 3/5 | 7/11 | |
Converted % | 67% | 60% | 64% | |
Conceded | 12 | 3 | 15 | |
Saved | 8/12 | 2/3 | 10 | |
Saved % | 67% | 67% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 4 | 1 | 5 |
Jung | ||||||
Q1 Ochi |
Q3 Moriya |
R1 Kudla |
R2 Chung |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 7-67 | 6-3 7-66 | 6-3 6-71 6-3 | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 10 | |
Tot Games | 23 | 22 | 31 | 28 | 104 | |
pts | 78-71 | 91-78 | 102-95 | 91-81 | 362-325 | |
Total points | 149 | 169 | 197 | 172 | 687 | |
Winners | 35 | 32 | 48 | 38 | 153 | |
%Winners | 45% | 35% | 47% | 42% | 42% | |
SERVE | ||||||
Aces | 5 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 16 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7 | |
1st in | 52/80 | 42/67 | 72/112 | 54/82 | 220/341 | |
% 1st in | 65% | 63% | 64% | 66% | 65% | |
1st pts | 35/52 | 32/42 | 48/72 | 38/54 | 153/220 | |
% 1st pts | 67% | 76% | 67% | 70% | 70% | |
2nd pts | 17/28 | 15/25 | 25/40 | 17/28 | 74/121 | |
% 2nd pts | 61% | 60% | 63% | 61% | 61% | |
Breaks | ||||||
Won | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 12 | |
Converted | 3/4 | 3/9 | 3/4 | 3/5 | 12/22 | |
Converted % | 75% | 33% | 75% | 60% | 55% | |
Conceded | 7 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 22 | |
Saved | 5/7 | 2/4 | 4/5 | 4/6 | 15 | |
Saved % | 71% | 50% | 80% | 67% | 134% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Jason JungJung (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Max PurcellPurcell – Emilio GomezGomez (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Jordan ThompsonThompson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Christopher EubanksEubanks (0-0) – H2H and prediction