Filip Krajinovic and Federico Gaio will square off in the 2nd round of the Prague 1 Challenger for the 6th time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 11:00 am on CENTRE COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Filip Krajinovic who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Filip Krajinovic is the pick to win this match.
Filip Krajinovic -> 1.36
Federico Gaio -> 2.96
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Filip Krajinovic vs. Federico Gaio
This will be the 6th time that Filip Krajinovic and Federico Gaio face off. The head to head is 5-0 for Krajinovic (see full H2H stats), 5-0 on clay.
The last time that they played each other, Krajinovic won 6-0 6-0 in the quarter in the Almaty Challenger back in 2017.
Filip Krajinovic
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 8-10 | 0-1 | 5-6 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 7-15 | 2-5 | 4-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 19-17 | 5-7 | 6-6 | 3-2 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 19-23 | 4-6 | 11-9 | 4-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2020 | 16-12 | 8-5 | 2-2 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 79, the Serbian reached the 2nd round after defeating Jan Choinski 6-4 4-6 6-2.
In the 1st round, Filip defeated Choinski (6-4 4-6 6-2). During the match, Krajinovic scored 100 points vs Choinski’s 92. Krajinovic was very aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Regarding the service games, Krajinovic recorded 5 aces and he was extremely steady in conceding no double faults. Filip Krajinovic lost the serve 3 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Krajinovic put 60% of his first serves in, winning 67% (33/49) of the points behind his 1st serve and 56% (18/32) on the 2nd serve. Filip broke Choinski 5 times after converting 36% of his break points (5/14).
Krajinovic has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 62% of his matches (306-187). 2-4 on clay in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Krajinovic has a composed 159-66 record in the last years on clay.
Filip has an aggregate 5-11 win-loss record in 2023, 2-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Prague 1 Challenger
Federico Gaio
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 14-17 | 2-7 | 12-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 43-30 | 14-12 | 25-15 | 3-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 18-28 | 9-9 | 8-15 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 36-38 | 6-8 | 14-16 | 13-11 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 17-19 | 5-4 | 10-12 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 326, Gaio reached the 2nd round after beating Denis Yevseyev 6-0 6-75 6-3, Henri Laaksonen 6-4 5-7 6-3 and Dimitar Kuzmanov 6-4 7-65.
In the 1st round, Federico had a good straight sets win against Kuzmanov (6-4 7-65). During the match Gaio scored 79 points vs Kuzmanov’s 67. Gaio was pretty aggressive to blast 35 winners.
About the serving games, Gaio recorded 2 aces and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Federico Gaio lost the serve twice and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Gaio put 62% of his first serves in, winning 73% (35/48) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (15/30) on the 2nd serve. The Italian was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Kuzmanov 3 times.
Gaio’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Monastir and M25 Vila Real de Santo Antonio.
Federico has a composed 25-11 win-loss record in 2023, 15-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Krajinovic | Gaio |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 3 |
Tot Set | 3 | 8 |
Tot Games | 28 | 82 |
Pts | 100-92 | 303-251 |
Total Points | 192 | 554 |
Winners | 33 | 104 |
%Winners | 33% | 34% |
Krajinovic played 1 match while Gaio competed in 3 matches. Gaio started his run from the qualifications while Krajinovic had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Filip Krajinovic conceded 1 set, while Federico Gaio conceded 2 sets. Krajinovic has played 5 set(s) less than Gaio (3 vs 8). Therefore, Krajinovic played 54 games less than Gaio. Filip scored 33 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, The Italian blasted 104 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Krajinovic | Gaio |
---|---|---|
Aces | 5 | 4 |
Avg per match | 5 | 1.3 |
1st in | 49/81 | 160/280 |
%1st in | 60% | 57% |
1st pts | 33/49 | 104/160 |
%1st pts | 67% | 65% |
2nd pts | 18/32 | 62/120 |
%2nd pts | 56% | 52% |
Krajinovic struck 5 aces . Gaio blasted 4 aces (1.3 per match). Krajinovic won 67% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Gaio won 65% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Krajinovic | Gaio |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 19 |
Converted | 5/14 | 19/39 |
% Converted | 36% | 49% |
Conceded | 7 | 31 |
Saved | 4 | 19 |
% Saved | 57% | 61% |
Times Broken | 3 | 12 |
The Serbian broke his opponent 5 times with a 36% conversion rate. Filip conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded. Gaio broke his opponents 19 times with a 49% conversion rate. Federico conceded his serve 12 times and he saved 61% of the break points that he conceded.
Krajinovic | |||
R1 Choinski |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 4-6 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
pts | 100-92 | 100-92 | |
Total points | 192 | 192 | |
Winners | 33 | 33 | |
%Winners | 33% | 33% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 5 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 49/81 | 49/81 | |
% 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
1st pts | 33/49 | 33/49 | |
% 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
2nd pts | 18/32 | 18/32 | |
% 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/14 | 5/14 | |
Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
Saved | 4/7 | 4 | |
Saved % | 57% | 57% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Gaio | |||||
Q1 Yevseyev |
Q3 Laaksonen |
R1 Kuzmanov |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-0 6-75 6-3 | 6-4 5-7 6-3 | 6-4 7-65 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 | |
Tot Games | 28 | 31 | 23 | 82 | |
pts | 107-81 | 117-103 | 79-67 | 303-251 | |
Total points | 188 | 220 | 146 | 554 | |
Winners | 35 | 34 | 35 | 104 | |
%Winners | 33% | 29% | 44% | 34% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 5 | 7 | 0 | 12 | |
1st in | 63/109 | 49/93 | 48/78 | 160/280 | |
% 1st in | 58% | 53% | 62% | 57% | |
1st pts | 35/63 | 34/49 | 35/48 | 104/160 | |
% 1st pts | 56% | 69% | 73% | 65% | |
2nd pts | 24/46 | 23/44 | 15/30 | 62/120 | |
% 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | 50% | 52% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 10 | 6 | 3 | 19 | |
Converted | 10/17 | 6/19 | 3/3 | 19/39 | |
Converted % | 59% | 32% | 100% | 49% | |
Conceded | 13 | 9 | 9 | 31 | |
Saved | 7/13 | 5/9 | 7/9 | 19 | |
Saved % | 54% | 56% | 78% | 188% | |
Times Broken | 6 | 4 | 2 | 12 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Prague 1 Challenger
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Andrew PaulsonPaulson (6-1 3-6 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tomas Barrios VeraBarrios Vera – Vit KoprivaKopriva (6-2 5-7 7-67) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Dominic StrickerStricker – Felipe Meligeni AlvesMeligeni Alves (6-75 6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Filip KrajinovicKrajinovic – Federico GaioGaio (5-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Norbert GombosGombos (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas KleinKlein – Franco AgamenoneAgamenone (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas MachacMachac – Zdenek KolarKolar (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – (0-0) – H2H and prediction