Christopher Eubanks and Brandon Holt will face off in the 2nd round of the Gwangju Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 10:30 am on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Christopher Eubanks who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Christopher Eubanks is the pick to win this match.
Christopher Eubanks -> 1.51
Brandon Holt -> 2.43
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Christopher Eubanks vs. Brandon Holt
There is no head to head record between Christopher Eubanks and Brandon Holt since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Christopher Eubanks
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6-17 | 2-6 | 0-6 | 2-1 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 39-26 | 24-16 | 1-2 | 0-4 | 14-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 43-26 | 24-16 | 1-2 | 14-6 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 30-21 | 19-13 | 0-1 | 11-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 13-8 | 12-6 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 90, the American got to the 2nd round after defeating Lloyd Harris 7-63 4-6 6-4.
In the 1st round, Christopher defeated Lloyd (7-63 4-6 6-4). During the match, Eubanks scored 90 points vs Lloyd’s 84. The American was extremely aggressive to blast 45 winners.
Talking about the service games, Eubanks fired 6 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Christopher Eubanks was very efficient on serve to win 80% (45/56) of his 1st serve and 76% (22/29) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Eubanks broke Lloyd once after converting 17% of his break points (1/6).
Eubanks has a winning record in the last 8 years having won 57% of his matches (186-138). 15-8 on hard in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Eubanks has an overall131-91 record in the last 8 years on hard.
The American has an overall 15-9 win-loss record in 2023, 15-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Gwangju Challenger
Brandon Holt
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-16 | 27-14 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 22-24 | 14-16 | 1-2 | 7-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 52-21 | 48-17 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 3-6 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-5 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 192, Brandon reached the 2nd round after beating Cem Ilkel 3-6 6-0 6-1.
In the 1st round against Ilkel, The American recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-0 6-1). During the match Holt scored 76 points vs Ilkel’s 55. Brandon was exceptionally aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about serving, Holt recorded 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Brandon Holt lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Holt put 63% of his first serves in, winning 70% (31/44) of the points behind his 1st serve and 54% (14/26) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Ilkel 6 times after converting 67% of his break points (6/9).
Brandon has an aggregate 10-11 win-loss record in 2023, 6-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Gwangju Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Eubanks | Holt |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 33 | 22 |
| Pts | 90-84 | 76-55 |
| Total Points | 174 | 131 |
| Winners | 45 | 31 |
| %Winners | 50% | 41% |
Both Eubanks and Holt played 1 match. Both players lost a set in the event. Christopher Eubanks dropped 1 set, while Brandon Holt dropped 1 set. Talking about their workload, Eubanks and Holt have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Eubanks played 11 games more than Holt. Eubanks scored 45 winners (50% of the total points). On the other side, Brandon recorded 31 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Eubanks | Holt |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 3 |
| 1st in | 56/85 | 44/70 |
| %1st in | 66% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 45/56 | 31/44 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 22/29 | 14/26 |
| %2nd pts | 76% | 54% |
Eubanks fired 6 aces . Holt managed to score 3 aces . Eubanks won 80% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 76% of the points. On the other side, Holt won 70% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Eubanks | Holt |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 1 | 6 |
| Converted | 1/6 | 6/9 |
| % Converted | 17% | 67% |
| Conceded | 1 | 4 |
| Saved | 0 | 2 |
| % Saved | 0% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
The American broke his opponent once with a 17% conversion rate. The American lost his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponent 6 times with a 67% conversion rate. Holt conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Eubanks | |||
| R1 Lloyd |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 4-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 33 | 33 | |
| pts | 90-84 | 90-84 | |
| Total points | 174 | 174 | |
| Winners | 45 | 45 | |
| %Winners | 50% | 50% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 56/85 | 56/85 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 45/56 | 45/56 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/29 | 22/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 76% | 76% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 1 | 1 | |
| Converted | 1/6 | 1/6 | |
| Converted % | 17% | 17% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Holt | |||
| R1 Ilkel |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-0 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 76-55 | 76-55 | |
| Total points | 131 | 131 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 44/70 | 44/70 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 31/44 | 31/44 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/26 | 14/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/9 | 6/9 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWWLLLLL
LLWWWWLWWL Tennis Scores in Gwangju Challenger
- Dominik PalanPalan – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (7-5 7-62) – See score progression
- Luke SavilleSaville – Peter GojowczykGojowczyk (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Sanhui ShinShin (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Yunseong ChungChung – Kaichi UchidaUchida (7-64 6-3) – See score progression
- Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy – Daniel MasurMasur (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Uisung ParkPark (6-1 6-73 6-0) – See score progression
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (2-6 7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Omar JasikaJasika (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Max PurcellPurcell – Ricardas BerankisBerankis (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Emilio GomezGomez – Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Jason JungJung – Denis KudlaKudla (6-3 6-71 6-3) – See score progression
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Gabriel DialloDiallo (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Brandon HoltHolt – Cem IlkelIlkel (3-6 6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Li TuTu – Tung-Lin WuWu (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Lloyd HarrisHarris (7-63 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Max PurcellPurcell – Ricardas BerankisBerankis (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Dominik PalanPalan – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Emilio GomezGomez – Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Yunseong ChungChung – Kaichi UchidaUchida (7-6(4) 6-3) – See score progression
- Jason JungJung – Denis KudlaKudla (6-3 6-7(1) 6-3) – See score progression
- Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy – Daniel MasurMasur (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy – Jordan ThompsonThompson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Marc PolmansPolmans (3-2) – H2H and prediction
- Max PurcellPurcell – Luke SavilleSaville (3-4) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yunseong ChungChung – Jason JungJung (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon HoltHolt – Christopher EubanksEubanks (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Li TuTu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
