Tristan Schoolkate and Luke Saville will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Gwangju Challenger for the 5th time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 1:00 pm on SHOW COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tristan Schoolkate who should win in 3 sets.
Tristan Schoolkate -> 1.71
Luke Saville -> 2.05
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Tristan Schoolkate vs. Luke Saville
This will be the 5th time that Tristan Schoolkate and Luke Saville square off. The head to head is 3-1 for Schoolkate (see full H2H stats), 3-0 on hard.
The last time that they locked horns, Saville won 7-6(4) 6-1
in the semifinal in M25 Swan Hill back in March 2023.Tristan Schoolkate
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 44-33 | 38-24 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 6-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 44-30 | 30-23 | 4-4 | 2-2 | 8-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 48-29 | 24-15 | 17-11 | 0-0 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-20 | 8-9 | 3-5 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2020 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 315, Schoolkate got to the qualifications after beating Woohyuk Sim 6-75 6-2 6-0.
In the qualifications against Sim, The Australian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-75 6-2 6-0). During the match, Schoolkate scored 100 points vs Sim’s 68. The Australian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Regarding the service games, Schoolkate fired 4 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Tristan Schoolkate lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Schoolkate put 73% of his first serves in, winning 70% (39/56) of the points behind his 1st serve and 57% (12/21) on the 2nd serve. The Australian broke Sim 7 times after converting 58% of his break points (7/12).
Schoolkate has a solid record in the last 5 years having won 60% of his matches (106-70). 13-9 on hard in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Schoolkate has an aggregate55-41 record in the last 5 years on hard.
Tristan’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Swan Hill.
The Australian has a composed 24-12 win-loss record in 2023, 13-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Gwangju Challenger
Tristan has never competed in this tournament before.
Luke Saville
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19-22 | 11-16 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 7-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 43-26 | 28-18 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 14-5 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 18-11 | 18-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-4 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-7 | 1-2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 479, Luke reached the qualifications after beating Woobin Shin 6-2 6-0.
In the qualifications, Saville had a good straight sets win against Shin (6-2 6-0). During the match Saville scored 53 points vs Shin’s 28. Saville was exceptionally aggressive to blast 19 winners.
About the serving games, Saville scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he was extremely solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Luke Saville conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 68% of his first serves in, win 68% (19/28) of the points behind his 1st serve and 85% (11/13) on the 2nd serve. Saville broke Shin 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
The Australian’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Swan Hill.
Luke has an aggregate 14-10 win-loss record in 2023, 8-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Schoolkate | Saville |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 27 | 14 |
| Pts | 100-68 | 53-28 |
| Total Points | 168 | 81 |
| Winners | 39 | 19 |
| %Winners | 39% | 36% |
Both Schoolkate and Saville played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Tristan Schoolkate dropped 1 set while Luke Saville hasn’t conceded a set so far. Schoolkate has played 1 set more than Saville (3 vs 2). Therefore, Schoolkate played 13 games more than Saville. The Australian scored 39 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Luke fired 19 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Schoolkate | Saville |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 1 |
| 1st in | 56/77 | 28/41 |
| %1st in | 73% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 39/56 | 19/28 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 12/21 | 11/13 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 85% |
Schoolkate bagged 4 aces . Saville blasted 1 ace . Schoolkate won 70% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Saville won 68% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 85% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Schoolkate | Saville |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 5 |
| Converted | 7/12 | 5/8 |
| % Converted | 58% | 63% |
| Conceded | 5 | 0 |
| Saved | 3 | 0 |
| % Saved | 60% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
Tristan broke his opponent 7 times with a 58% conversion rate. Schoolkate lost his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. The Australian broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. The Australian was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Schoolkate | |||
| Q1 Sim | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-75 6-2 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | 100-68 | 100-68 | |
| Total points | 168 | 168 | |
| Winners | 39 | 39 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 56/77 | 56/77 | |
| % 1st in | 73% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 39/56 | 39/56 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/21 | 12/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/12 | 7/12 | |
| Converted % | 58% | 58% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Saville | |||
| Q1 Shin | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
| pts | 53-28 | 53-28 | |
| Total points | 81 | 81 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 28/41 | 28/41 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 19/28 | 19/28 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/13 | 11/13 | |
| % 2nd pts | 85% | 85% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Tatsuma ItoIto – Peter GojowczykGojowczyk (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jason JungJung – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Brandon HoltHolt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MasurMasur – Dayne KellyKelly (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek – Emilio GomezGomez (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Omar JasikaJasika – Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Max PurcellPurcell – Richard BerankisBerankis (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yunseong ChungChung – Kaichi UchidaUchida (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Li TuTu (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Christopher EubanksEubanks (4-1) – H2H and prediction
- Uisung ParkPark – Jordan ThompsonThompson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Gabriel DialloDiallo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Sanhui ShinShin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Luke SavilleSaville (3-1) – H2H and prediction