Franco Agamenone and Jesper De Jong will clash against each other in the quarter of the Rome Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 2:00 pm on CAMPO CENTRALE. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jesper De Jong who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jesper De Jong is the pick to win this match.
Jesper De Jong -> 1.69
Franco Agamenone -> 2.11
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Franco Agamenone vs. Jesper De Jong
This will be the 2nd time that Franco Agamenone and Jesper De Jong clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for De (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they locked horns, De won 6-2 4-6 6-4 in the 2nd round in the Guayaquil Challenger back in 2022.
Franco Agamenone
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 12-17 | 1-4 | 10-9 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-29 | 0-3 | 24-24 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 35-32 | 6-3 | 26-24 | 3-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 81-23 | 21-5 | 60-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 22-8 | 0-0 | 22-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 148, Franco reached the quarter after beating Salvatore Caruso 6-3 6-4 and Oriol Roca Batalla 7-5 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Agamenone had a good straight sets win against Roca Batalla (7-5 6-3). During the match, Agamenone scored 72 points vs Roca Batalla’s 54. The Italian was pretty aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about the service games, Agamenone was unable to score even 1 ace in the course of the match and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Franco Agamenone was pretty efficient on serve to win 72% (26/36) of his 1st serve and 63% (12/19) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Agamenone broke Roca Batalla 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Italian hasn’t dropped yet a set in this competition to conquer 55% of the points he played.
Agamenone has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 62% of his matches (325-197). 9-8 on clay in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Agamenone has a composed 288-172 match record in the last years on clay.
Franco’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in the Barletta Challenger.
Agamenone has an overall 9-10 win-loss record in 2023, 9-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Rome Challenger
Jesper De Jong
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-16 | 7-3 | 20-10 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 52-23 | 19-4 | 30-14 | 0-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-28 | 12-7 | 10-13 | 2-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 32-29 | 2-6 | 27-18 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 31-12 | 7-3 | 14-5 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 234, the Dutch got to the quarter after defeating Marek Gengel 6-3 6-2 and Gianluca Mager 6-0 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Jesper had a good straight sets win against Mager (6-0 6-3). During the match De scored 65 points vs Mager’s 41. The Dutch was pretty aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about serving, De fired 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Jesper De Jong lost the serve once and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, De put 78% of his first serves in, winning 78% (28/36) of the points behind his 1st serve and 40% (4/10) on the 2nd serve. De broke Mager 5 times after converting 38% of his break points (5/13).
Overall Performance in this tournament
De hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 60% of the points he played.
The Dutch’s best result of the season was reaching the final in the Tigre 2 Challenger and M25 Quinta Do Lago.
Jesper has a composed 29-9 win-loss record in 2023, 19-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Agamenone | De |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 40 | 32 |
| Pts | 133-108 | 130-88 |
| Total Points | 241 | 218 |
| Winners | 52 | 49 |
| %Winners | 39% | 38% |
Both Agamenone and De played 2 matches. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Agamenone and De have played the same amount of sets 4. However, Agamenone played 8 games more than De. Agamenone scored 52 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Jesper blasted 49 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Agamenone | De |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 3 |
| 1st in | 73/120 | 68/106 |
| %1st in | 61% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 52/73 | 49/68 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 22/47 | 22/38 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 58% |
Agamenone fired 2 aces (1 per match). De recorded 6 aces (3 per match). Agamenone won 71% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, De won 72% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Agamenone | De |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 9 | 9 |
| Converted | 9/16 | 9/21 |
| % Converted | 56% | 43% |
| Conceded | 8 | 11 |
| Saved | 4 | 9 |
| % Saved | 50% | 82% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 2 |
Franco broke his opponents 9 times with a 56% conversion rate. The Italian lost his serve 4 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Jesper broke his opponents 9 times with a 43% conversion rate. Jesper conceded his serve twice and he saved 82% of the break points that he conceded.
| Agamenone | ||||
| R1 Caruso |
R2 Roca Batalla |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 21 | 40 | |
| pts | 61-54 | 72-54 | 133-108 | |
| Total points | 115 | 126 | 241 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | 52 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 36% | 39% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 1 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 37/65 | 36/55 | 73/120 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 65% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 26/37 | 26/36 | 52/73 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 72% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/28 | 12/19 | 22/47 | |
| % 2nd pts | 36% | 63% | 47% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 4 | 9 | |
| Converted | 5/6 | 4/10 | 9/16 | |
| Converted % | 83% | 40% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 1 | 8 | |
| Saved | 4/7 | 0/1 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 57% | 0% | 29% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
| De | ||||
| R1 Gengel |
R2 Mager |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | 6-0 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 15 | 32 | |
| pts | 65-47 | 65-41 | 130-88 | |
| Total points | 112 | 106 | 218 | |
| Winners | 21 | 28 | 49 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 43% | 38% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 32/60 | 36/46 | 68/106 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 78% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 21/32 | 28/36 | 49/68 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 78% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/28 | 4/10 | 22/38 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 40% | 58% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 5 | 9 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 5/13 | 9/21 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 38% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 5 | 11 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 4/5 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 80% | 82% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLLLWWWL
LWWWWWWLWL Tennis Scores in Rome Challenger
- Sadio Doumbia/Fabien ReboulDoumbia/Fabien Reboul – Inigo Cervantes/Oriol Roca BatallaCervantes/Oriol Roca Batalla (7-62 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Alexander RitschardRitschard – Joris De LooreDe Loore (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sumit NagalNagal – Max HoukesHoukes (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Franco AgamenoneAgamenone (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (1-0) – H2H and prediction
