Julia Grabher and Dayana Yastremska will play each other in the qualifications of the Mutua Madrid Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Tuesday at 1:30 pm on COURT 5. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Dayana Yastremska who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Dayana Yastremska is the pick to win this match.
Dayana Yastremska -> 1.54
Julia Grabher -> 2.36
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Julia Grabher vs. Dayana Yastremska
There is no head to head record between Julia Grabher and Dayana Yastremska since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Julia Grabher
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 23-26 | 5-9 | 17-11 | 1-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 55-32 | 3-6 | 46-22 | 6-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 30-25 | 5-4 | 21-13 | 3-7 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 10-13 | 0-3 | 5-4 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 92, Julia reached the qualifications after beating Ana Konjuh 6-4 7-64.
In the qualifications, Grabher had a good straight sets win against Konjuh (6-4 7-64). During the match, Grabher scored 89 points vs Konjuh’s 81. Julia was pretty aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Talking about the service games, Grabher scored just 1 ace during the match and she was not very steady on her 2nd serve to score 10 double faults. Julia Grabher lost the serve 4 times and she saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Grabher put 69% of her first serves in, winning 66% (39/59) of the points behind her 1st serve and 31% (8/26) on the 2nd serve. Julia broke Konjuh 5 times after converting 56% of her break points (5/9).
Grabher has a solid match record in the last 9 years having won 61% of her matches (323-206). 3-2 on clay in 2023. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this competition, Grabher has a compiled280-147 win-loss record in the last 9 years on clay.
Julia has a compiled 8-14 win-loss record in 2023, 3-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Madrid
Julia has never competed in this tournament before.
Dayana Yastremska
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 16-10 | 12-6 | 3-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 39-29 | 19-13 | 12-9 | 5-4 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-25 | 7-11 | 5-4 | 7-6 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 7-12 | 3-8 | 2-1 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-12 | 10-7 | 4-3 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 149, the Ukrainian got to the qualifications after defeating Eva Lys 5-1 ret..
In the qualifications against Lys, Yastremska had a free pass after Lys retired on a 5-1 . scoreline.
Yastremska has a compiled 10-11 win-loss record in 2023, 1-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Madrid
Previously, her best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2022. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Grabher | Yastremska |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 23 | 6 |
| Pts | 89-81 | 27-18 |
| Total Points | 170 | 45 |
| Winners | 39 | 10 |
| %Winners | 44% | 37% |
Both Grabher and Yastremska played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Grabher and Yastremska have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Grabher played 17 games more than Yastremska. The Austrian scored 39 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Yastremska blasted 10 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Grabher | Yastremska |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 0 |
| 1st in | 59/85 | 18/28 |
| %1st in | 69% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 39/59 | 10/18 |
| %1st pts | 66% | 56% |
| 2nd pts | 8/26 | 5/10 |
| %2nd pts | 31% | 50% |
Grabher managed to score 1 ace . Yastremska didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Grabher won 66% points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 31% of the points. On the other side, Yastremska won 56% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Grabher | Yastremska |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 3 |
| Converted | 5/9 | 3/4 |
| % Converted | 56% | 75% |
| Conceded | 12 | 3 |
| Saved | 8 | 2 |
| % Saved | 67% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 1 |
Julia broke her opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Julia surrendered her serve 4 times and she saved 67% of the break points that she conceded. Dayana broke her opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. Dayana conceded her serve once and she saved 67% of the break points that she conceded.
| Grabher | |||
| Q1 Konjuh |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 89-81 | 89-81 | |
| Total points | 170 | 170 | |
| Winners | 39 | 39 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 10 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 59/85 | 59/85 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 39/59 | 39/59 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/26 | 8/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 31% | 31% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 12 | 12 | |
| Saved | 8/12 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Yastremska | |||
| Q1 Lys |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 5-1 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 1 | 1 | |
| Tot Games | 6 | 6 | |
| pts | 27-18 | 27-18 | |
| Total points | 45 | 45 | |
| Winners | 10 | 10 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 18/28 | 18/28 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 10/18 | 10/18 | |
| % 1st pts | 56% | 56% | |
| 2nd pts | 5/10 | 5/10 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLL
WLWLWLLWLL Tennis Scores in Madrid
- Harrison AdamsAdams – Mwendwa MbithiMbithi (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Evan ZhuZhu – Sid DonarskiDonarski (6-1 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Viktoriya TomovaTomova – Clara BurelBurel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Julia GrabherGrabher – Dayana YastremskaYastremska (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nuria Parrizas-DiazParrizas-Diaz – Tamara KorpatschKorpatsch (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marketa VondrousovaVondrousova – Taylor TownsendTownsend (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sara ErraniErrani – Jodie Anna BurrageAnna Burrage (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse – Leolia JeanjeanJeanjean (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna-Lena FriedsamFriedsam – Arantxa RusRus (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Kamilla RakhimovaRakhimova – Laura SiegemundSiegemund (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna SchmiedlovaSchmiedlova – Kimberly BirrellBirrell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Irene Burillo EscorihuelaBurillo Escorihuela – Emiliana ArangoArango (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elizabeth MandlikMandlik – Eugenie BouchardBouchard (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Magdalena FrechFrech – Aliona BolsovaBolsova (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Dalma GalfiGalfi – Caty McNallyMcNally (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Varvara GrachevaGracheva – Xiyu WangWang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna KalinskayaKalinskaya – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elina SvitolinaSvitolina – Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jaqueline CristianCristian – Sloane StephensStephens (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lesya TsurenkoTsurenko – Lucia BronzettiBronzetti (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kaia KanepiKanepi – Shelby RogersRogers (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Barbora StrycovaStrycova – Elisabetta CocciarettoCocciaretto (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rebeka MasarovaMasarova – Cristina BucsaBucsa (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maryna ZanevskaZanevska – Sofia KeninKenin (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Anett KontaveitKontaveit – Karolina MuchovaMuchova (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Ana BogdanBogdan – Anna BondarBondar (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yulia PutintsevaPutintseva – Claire LiuLiu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Camila GiorgiGiorgi – Mayar SherifSherif (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lin ZhuZhu – Rebecca MarinoMarino (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jule NiemeierNiemeier – Xin Yu WangYu Wang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sorana CirsteaCirstea – Lauren DavisDavis (0-1) – H2H and prediction
