![Prediction And Head To Head Borna Gojo Vs. Zsombor Piros Avhvdhkcdh Prediction and head to head Borna Gojo vs. Zsombor Piros](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Borna-Gojo-vs.-Zsombor-Piros-AvHvDHKCDH.jpg)
Borna Gojo and Zsombor Piros will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Mutua Madrid Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Tuesday at 5:00 pm on COURT 4. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Borna Gojo who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Borna Gojo is the pick to win this match.
Borna Gojo -> 1.7
Zsombor Piros -> 2.06
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Borna Gojo vs. Zsombor Piros
This will be the 2nd time that Borna Gojo and Zsombor Piros face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Piros (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on clay.
The last time that they fought against each other, Piros won 6-7(5) 6-1 6-3 in the 2nd round in the Forli 2 Challenger back in 2022.
Borna Gojo
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 43-25 | 22-9 | 12-7 | 6-5 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
2022 | 40-28 | 19-9 | 5-5 | 14-10 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
2021 | 21-22 | 8-7 | 3-6 | 7-6 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 23-14 | 11-6 | 10-6 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 110, Borna got to the qualifications after beating Jan Choinski 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Croatian had a good straight sets win against Choinski (6-3 6-2). During the match, Gojo scored 60 points vs Choinski’s 46. Gojo was exceptionally aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about the service games, Gojo managed to score 11 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Borna Gojo was pretty efficient on serve to win 77% (30/39) of his 1st serve and 60% (12/20) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Borna broke Choinski 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Gojo has a winning record in the last 8 years having won 59% of his matches (204-141). 5-2 on clay in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Gojo has a compiled41-37 record in the last 8 years on clay.
Borna’s best result of the year was getting to the final in the Monterrey Challenger and the Murcia Challenger.
The Croatian has an aggregate 20-9 win-loss record in 2023, 5-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Madrid
Borna has never competed in this tournament before.
Zsombor Piros
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 15-16 | 1-4 | 7-10 | 7-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 48-29 | 3-2 | 35-18 | 5-7 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 38-23 | 7-6 | 19-9 | 10-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
2021 | 47-16 | 3-2 | 31-9 | 13-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 8-2 | 1-1 | 7-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 118 (career-high), the Hungarian reached the qualifications after beating Pablo Andujar 3-6 6-1 6-2.
In the qualifications against Andujar, The Hungarian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-1 6-2). During the match Piros scored 93 points vs Andujar’s 74. Zsombor was exceptionally aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Talking about serving, Piros scored 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Zsombor Piros was quite efficient on serve to win 75% (40/53) of his 1st serve and 52% (17/33) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Hungarian broke Andujar 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
His best result of the year was winning the title the Split Challenger where he overcame Norbert Gombos in the final 7-6(2) 7-6(9) and the Oeiras 3 Challenger where he overcame Juan Manuel Cerundolo in the final 6-3 6-4.
Piros has a compiled 24-10 win-loss record in 2023, 19-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Madrid
Piros has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Gojo | Piros |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
Tot Games | 17 | 24 |
Pts | 60-46 | 93-74 |
Total Points | 106 | 167 |
Winners | 30 | 40 |
%Winners | 50% | 43% |
Both Gojo and Piros played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Zsombor Piros conceded 1 set while Borna Gojo hasn’t lost a set so far. Gojo has played 1 set(s) less than Piros (2 vs 3). Therefore, Gojo played 7 games less than Piros. Borna scored 30 winners (50% of the total points). On the other side, Zsombor scored 40 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Gojo | Piros |
---|---|---|
Aces | 11 | 5 |
Avg per match | 11 | 5 |
1st in | 39/59 | 53/86 |
%1st in | 66% | 62% |
1st pts | 30/39 | 40/53 |
%1st pts | 77% | 75% |
2nd pts | 12/20 | 17/33 |
%2nd pts | 60% | 52% |
Gojo fired 11 aces . Piros scored 5 aces . Gojo won 77% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Piros won 75% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Gojo | Piros |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 4 |
Converted | 3/6 | 4/10 |
% Converted | 50% | 40% |
Conceded | 8 | 5 |
Saved | 8 | 4 |
% Saved | 100% | 80% |
Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
The Croatian broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Croatian very solid his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 8 break points. The Hungarian broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. Piros conceded his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
Gojo | |||
Q1 Choinski |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
pts | 60-46 | 60-46 | |
Total points | 106 | 106 | |
Winners | 30 | 30 | |
%Winners | 50% | 50% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 11 | 11 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 39/59 | 39/59 | |
% 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
1st pts | 30/39 | 30/39 | |
% 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
2nd pts | 12/20 | 12/20 | |
% 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
Saved | 8/8 | 8 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Piros | |||
Q1 Andujar |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 3-6 6-1 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 24 | 24 | |
pts | 93-74 | 93-74 | |
Total points | 167 | 167 | |
Winners | 40 | 40 | |
%Winners | 43% | 43% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 5 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 53/86 | 53/86 | |
% 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
1st pts | 40/53 | 40/53 | |
% 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
2nd pts | 17/33 | 17/33 | |
% 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Fabio FogniniFognini – Oscar OtteOtte (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas – Ilya IvashkaIvashka (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jeremy ChardyChardy – Hugo GastonGaston (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jan-Lennard StruffStruff – Aslan KaratsevKaratsev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler – Dusan LajovicLajovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kyle EdmundEdmund – Dominic ThiemThiem (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – David GoffinGoffin (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Kaichi UchidaUchida – Benoit PairePaire (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis – Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander BublikBublik – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Filip KrajinovicKrajinovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian GarinGarin – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Sebastian OfnerOfner (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Jurij RodionovRodionov (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Borna GojoGojo – Zsombor PirosPiros (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nuno BorgesBorges – Marcos GironGiron (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexei PopyrinPopyrin – Quentin HalysHalys (2-3) – H2H and prediction
- Corentin MoutetMoutet – Constant LestienneLestienne (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves – Andrea VavassoriVavassori (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori – Ugo HumbertHumbert (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Adrian MannarinoMannarino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yibing WuWu – Alex MolcanMolcan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pavel KotovKotov – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime CressyCressy – Stan WawrinkaWawrinka (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio NavaNava – Gregoire BarrereBarrere (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko – Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo (1-0) – H2H and prediction