Kyrian Jacquet and Govind Nanda will play each other in the qualifications of the Savannah Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:00 am on ATLANTIC RADIOLOGY COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kyrian Jacquet who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Kyrian Jacquet is the pick to win this match.
Kyrian Jacquet -> 1.56
Govind Nanda -> 2.31
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Kyrian Jacquet vs. Govind Nanda
There is no head to head record between Kyrian Jacquet and Govind Nanda since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Kyrian Jacquet
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21-15 | 8-5 | 12-8 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 39-22 | 11-5 | 27-15 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 31-25 | 9-5 | 19-13 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 34-28 | 1-3 | 19-14 | 14-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-11 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 408, the French player reached the qualifications after beating Daniil Glinka 4-6 7-64 7-5.
In the qualifications against Glinka, Kyrian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-64 7-5).During the match, Jacquet scored less points (1) than Glinka. In fact, the world no. 408 won 115 points vs Glinka’s. That means that Jacquet was more focused during the important points. Kyrian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 48 winners.
Regarding the service games, Jacquet bagged 2 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Kyrian Jacquet lost the serve 6 times and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Jacquet put 68% of his first serves in, winning 62% (48/77) of the points behind his 1st serve and 41% (15/37) on the 2nd serve. The French player broke Glinka 6 times after converting 40% of his break points (6/15).
Jacquet has a winning win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 56% of his matches (127-101). 7-2 on clay in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Jacquet has a composed57-39 record in the last 6 years on clay.
The French player best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in M25 Palmanova.
Kyrian has a composed 10-5 win-loss record in 2023, 7-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Savannah Challenger
The French player has never competed in this tournament before.
Govind Nanda
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 15-9 | 15-8 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 5-6 | 1-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 27-26 | 22-19 | 5-3 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-14 | 21-10 | 2-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 419, Govind reached the qualifications after defeating Isaiah Strode 2-6 7-62 6-3.
In the qualifications against Strode, Govind recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 7-62 6-3). During the match Nanda scored 95 points vs Strode’s 93. Govind was very aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Talking about serving, Nanda scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he was exceptionally steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Govind Nanda lost the serve 5 times and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Nanda put 64% of his first serves in, winning 61% (39/64) of the points behind his 1st serve and 56% (20/36) on the 2nd serve. Nanda broke Strode 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Nanda has an overall 3-3 win-loss record in 2023, 2-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Savannah Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Jacquet | Nanda |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 35 | 30 |
| Pts | 115-116 | 95-93 |
| Total Points | 231 | 188 |
| Winners | 48 | 39 |
| %Winners | 42% | 41% |
Both Jacquet and Nanda played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Kyrian Jacquet conceded 1 set, while Govind Nanda surrendered 1 set. Talking about their workload, Jacquet and Nanda have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Jacquet played 5 games more than Nanda. Jacquet scored 48 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, The American bagged 39 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Jacquet | Nanda |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 1 |
| 1st in | 77/114 | 64/100 |
| %1st in | 68% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 48/77 | 39/64 |
| %1st pts | 62% | 61% |
| 2nd pts | 15/37 | 20/36 |
| %2nd pts | 41% | 56% |
Jacquet struck 2 aces . Nanda scored 1 ace . Jacquet won 62% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 41% of the points. On the other side, Nanda won 61% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Jacquet | Nanda |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 4 |
| Converted | 6/15 | 4/9 |
| % Converted | 40% | 44% |
| Conceded | 13 | 12 |
| Saved | 7 | 7 |
| % Saved | 54% | 58% |
| Times Broken | 6 | 5 |
Jacquet broke his opponent 6 times with a 40% conversion rate. Kyrian surrendered his serve 6 times and he saved 54% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 58% of the break points that he conceded.
| Jacquet | |||
| Q1 Glinka |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 7-64 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 35 | 35 | |
| pts | 115-116 | 115-116 | |
| Total points | 231 | 231 | |
| Winners | 48 | 48 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 77/114 | 77/114 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 48/77 | 48/77 | |
| % 1st pts | 62% | 62% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/37 | 15/37 | |
| % 2nd pts | 41% | 41% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/15 | 6/15 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 13 | 13 | |
| Saved | 7/13 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 54% | 54% | |
| Times Broken | 6 | 6 | |
| Nanda | |||
| Q1 Strode |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 7-62 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 95-93 | 95-93 | |
| Total points | 188 | 188 | |
| Winners | 39 | 39 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 64/100 | 64/100 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 39/64 | 39/64 | |
| % 1st pts | 61% | 61% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/36 | 20/36 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 12 | 12 | |
| Saved | 7/12 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 58% | 58% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWWLWWWL
LWWLLLLLLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jose StathamStatham – Moez EcharguiEchargui (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick ChappellChappell – Alex RybakovRybakov (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Elmar EjupovicEjupovic – Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Colin SinclairSinclair – Luca PotenzaPotenza (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Nicolas KickerKicker (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Aziz DougazDougaz – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matteo MartineauMartineau – Ulises BlanchBlanch (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Evan ZhuZhu – Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zizou BergsBergs – Bernard TomicTomic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Govind NandaNanda – Kyrian JacquetJacquet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oliver CrawfordCrawford – Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan BoyerBoyer – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
