Franco Agamenone and Nicholas David Ionel will square off in the quarter of the Roseto Degli Abruzzi Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 4:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Franco Agamenone who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Franco Agamenone is the pick to win this match.
Franco Agamenone -> 1.73
Nicholas David Ionel -> 2.05
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Franco Agamenone vs. Nicholas David Ionel
There is no head to head record between Franco Agamenone and Nicholas David Ionel since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Franco Agamenone
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 12-17 | 1-4 | 10-9 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-29 | 0-3 | 24-24 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 35-32 | 6-3 | 26-24 | 3-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 81-23 | 21-5 | 60-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 22-8 | 0-0 | 22-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 147, Franco reached the quarter after beating Gian Marco Moroni 6-3 7-5 and Kilian Feldbausch 6-0 6-1.
In the 2nd round, Franco had a good straight sets win against Feldbausch (6-0 6-1). During the match, Agamenone scored 55 points vs Feldbausch’s 23. Franco was exceptionally aggressive to blast 20 winners.
Talking about the service games, Agamenone couldn’t to score even 1 ace in the encounter and he committed only 1 double fault. Franco Agamenone was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 87% (20/23) of his 1st serve and 69% (9/13) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Franco broke Feldbausch 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Franco hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this tournament to conquer 60% of the points he played.
Agamenone has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 62% of his matches (323-196). 7-7 on clay in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Agamenone has a compiled 286-171 record in the last years on clay.
Franco’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in the Barletta Challenger.
Agamenone has an aggregate 7-9 win-loss record in 2023, 7-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Roseto Degli Abruzzi Challenger
Nicholas David Ionel
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 31-21 | 0-2 | 31-18 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 50-38 | 7-7 | 43-30 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 66-33 | 17-9 | 48-20 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 47-33 | 14-4 | 33-29 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 19-14 | 16-8 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 219, Nicholas reached the quarter after defeating Edoardo Lavagno 7-5 4-4 ret. and Sumit Nagal 7-5 7-66.
In the 2nd round, David had a good straight sets win against Nagal (7-5 7-66). During the match David scored 76 points vs Nagal’s 74. The Romanian was very aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about serving, David was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 3 double faults. Nicholas David Ionel lost the serve 6 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, David put 66% of his first serves in, winning 53% (27/51) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (11/26) on the 2nd serve. The Romanian broke Nagal 7 times after converting 88% of his break points (7/8).
David’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M15 Jakarta.
David has a composed 18-12 win-loss record in 2023, 11-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Agamenone | David |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 34 | 45 |
| Pts | 137-93 | 148-144 |
| Total Points | 230 | 292 |
| Winners | 52 | 58 |
| %Winners | 38% | 39% |
Both Agamenone and David played 2 matches. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Agamenone has played 1 set(s) less than David (4 vs 5). Therefore, Agamenone played 11 games less than David. Agamenone scored 52 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, The Romanian made 58 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Agamenone | David |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 0.5 | 1.5 |
| 1st in | 77/117 | 96/160 |
| %1st in | 66% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 52/77 | 58/96 |
| %1st pts | 68% | 60% |
| 2nd pts | 20/40 | 26/64 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 41% |
Agamenone made 1 ace (0.5 per match). David also recorded 3 aces (1.5 per match). Agamenone won 68% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, David won 60% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 41% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Agamenone | David |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 12 | 11 |
| Converted | 12/21 | 11/14 |
| % Converted | 57% | 79% |
| Conceded | 14 | 21 |
| Saved | 9 | 12 |
| % Saved | 64% | 57% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 9 |
Franco broke his opponents 12 times with a 57% conversion rate. Franco surrendered his serve 5 times and he saved 64% of the break points that he conceded. Nicholas broke his opponents 11 times with a 79% conversion rate. Nicholas conceded his serve 9 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded.
| Agamenone | ||||
| R1 Marco Moroni |
R2 Feldbausch |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-5 | 6-0 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 13 | 34 | |
| pts | 82-70 | 55-23 | 137-93 | |
| Total points | 152 | 78 | 230 | |
| Winners | 32 | 20 | 52 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 36% | 38% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 1 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 54/81 | 23/36 | 77/117 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 64% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 32/54 | 20/23 | 52/77 | |
| % 1st pts | 59% | 87% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/27 | 9/13 | 20/40 | |
| % 2nd pts | 41% | 69% | 50% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 7 | 5 | 12 | |
| Converted | 7/11 | 5/10 | 12/21 | |
| Converted % | 64% | 50% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 12 | 2 | 14 | |
| Saved | 7/12 | 2/2 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 58% | 100% | 79% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 0 | 5 | |
| David | ||||
| R1 Lavagno |
R2 Nagal |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 4-4 ret. | 7-5 7-66 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 25 | 45 | |
| pts | 72-70 | 76-74 | 148-144 | |
| Total points | 142 | 150 | 292 | |
| Winners | 31 | 27 | 58 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 36% | 39% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 3 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 45/83 | 51/77 | 96/160 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 66% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 31/45 | 27/51 | 58/96 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 53% | 60% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/38 | 11/26 | 26/64 | |
| % 2nd pts | 39% | 42% | 41% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 7 | 11 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 7/8 | 11/14 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 88% | 79% | |
| Conceded | 12 | 9 | 21 | |
| Saved | 9/12 | 3/9 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 33% | 54% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 6 | 9 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLLLWWWL
LLWWWLWLWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gauthier OnclinOnclin – (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel – Franco AgamenoneAgamenone (0-0) – H2H and prediction
