Nicholas David Ionel and Sumit Nagal will face off in the 2nd round of the Roseto Degli Abruzzi Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 1:30 pm on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Sumit Nagal who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Sumit Nagal is the pick to win this match.
Sumit Nagal -> 1.48
Nicholas David Ionel -> 2.52
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Nicholas David Ionel vs. Sumit Nagal
There is no head to head record between Nicholas David Ionel and Sumit Nagal since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Nicholas David Ionel
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 70-32 | 0-2 | 70-29 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 50-38 | 7-7 | 43-30 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 66-33 | 17-9 | 48-20 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 47-33 | 14-4 | 33-29 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 19-14 | 16-8 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 219,he will start his run in the Roseto Degli Abruzzi Challenger after he played his last match in the Roseto Degli Abruzzi Challenger where he beat 7-5 4-4 ret. to Lavagno in the 1st round on the 19th of April.
The Romanian has an aggregate 16-12 win-loss record in 2023, 9-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Nicholas’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M15 Jakarta.
Talking about his overall career, Nicholas has an overall 179-104 record. He has a positive 124-71 record on clay.
Previously in the Roseto Degli Abruzzi Challenger
Nicholas has never competed in this tournament before.
Sumit Nagal
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 32-29 | 15-13 | 16-11 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-29 | 9-8 | 32-17 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-18 | 0-1 | 16-17 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-26 | 1-4 | 22-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-14 | 2-4 | 5-5 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 366, the Indian got to the 2nd round after defeating Giorgio Ricca 6-1 6-2, Riccardo Balzerani 6-3 6-3 and Jacopo Berrettini 6-3 6-0.
In the 1st round, Nagal had a good straight sets win against Berrettini (6-3 6-0). During the match Nagal scored 54 points vs Berrettini’s 33. The Indian was pretty aggressive to blast 20 winners.
Talking about serving, Nagal wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 2 double faults. Sumit Nagal lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Nagal put 82% of his first serves in, winning 63% (20/32) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (3/7) on the 2nd serve. The Indian broke Berrettini 7 times after converting 64% of his break points (7/11).
The Indian’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in the Chennai Challenger.
The Indian has a compiled 11-9 win-loss record in 2023, 3-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | David Ionel | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 48 |
| Pts | 72-70 | 187-124 |
| Total Points | 142 | 311 |
| Winners | 31 | 69 |
| %Winners | 43% | 37% |
David Ionel played 1 match while Nagal competed in 3 matches. Nagal started his run from the qualifications while David Ionel had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. David Ionel has played 3 set(s) less than Nagal (3 vs 6). Therefore, David Ionel played 28 games less than Nagal. David Ionel scored 31 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Nagal fired 69 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | David Ionel | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 0.7 |
| 1st in | 45/83 | 102/145 |
| %1st in | 54% | 70% |
| 1st pts | 31/45 | 69/102 |
| %1st pts | 69% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 15/38 | 20/43 |
| %2nd pts | 39% | 47% |
David Ionel bagged 3 aces . Nagal bagged 2 aces (0.7 per match). David Ionel won 69% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 39% of the points. On the other side, Nagal won 68% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | David Ionel | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 19 |
| Converted | 4/6 | 19/34 |
| % Converted | 67% | 56% |
| Conceded | 12 | 15 |
| Saved | 9 | 9 |
| % Saved | 75% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 6 |
David Ionel broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. Nicholas surrendered his serve 3 times and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. Nagal broke his opponents 19 times with a 56% conversion rate. Nagal conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| David Ionel | ||
| Total | ||
|---|---|---|
| Score | ||
| Tot Set | 0 | |
| Tot Games | 0 | |
| pts | 0-0 | |
| Total points | 0 | |
| Winners | 0 | |
| %Winners | 0% | |
| SERVE | ||
| Aces | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | |
| 1st in | 0/0 | |
| % 1st in | 0% | |
| 1st pts | 0/0 | |
| % 1st pts | % | |
| 2nd pts | 0/0 | |
| % 2nd pts | 0% | |
| Breaks | ||
| Won | 0 | |
| Converted | 0/0 | |
| Converted % | 0% | |
| Conceded | 0 | |
| Saved | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | |
| Nagal | |||||
| Q1 Ricca |
Q3 Balzerani |
R1 Berrettini |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-2 | 6-3 6-3 | 6-3 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 18 | 15 | 48 | |
| pts | 58-34 | 75-57 | 54-33 | 187-124 | |
| Total points | 92 | 132 | 87 | 311 | |
| Winners | 22 | 27 | 20 | 69 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 36% | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 32/43 | 38/63 | 32/39 | 102/145 | |
| % 1st in | 74% | 60% | 82% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 22/32 | 27/38 | 20/32 | 69/102 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 71% | 63% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/11 | 11/25 | 3/7 | 20/43 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 44% | 43% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 6 | 6 | 7 | 19 | |
| Converted | 6/8 | 6/15 | 7/11 | 19/34 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 40% | 64% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 6 | 6 | 15 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 3/6 | 4/6 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 50% | 67% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWWLWWW
LLLLWLLLLL Tennis Scores in Roseto Degli Abruzzi Challenger
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Gian Marco MoroniMarco Moroni (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Gabriele PirainoPiraino (2-6 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Jelle SelsSels – Gianmarco FerrariFerrari (7-63 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Raphael CollignonCollignon – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (6-75 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Mate ValkuszValkusz (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Kacper ZukZuk (7-5 6-0) – See score progression
- Sumit NagalNagal – Jacopo BerrettiniBerrettini (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Gauthier OnclinOnclin – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (7-5 5-7 6-4) – See score progression
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Juan Bautista TorresBautista Torres (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna – Ergi KirkinKirkin (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Salvatore CarusoCaruso – Dan AddedAdded (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Kilian FeldbauschFeldbausch – Mariano NavoneNavone (7-65 6-0) – See score progression
- Emilio NavaNava – Titouan DroguetDroguet (6-4 2-6 6-0) – See score progression
- Francesco FortiForti – Giovanni FonioFonio (7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Gianluca MagerMager – Nikola MilojevicMilojevic (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Salvatore CarusoCaruso – Dan AddedAdded (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Mate ValkuszValkusz (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Gabriele PirainoPiraino (2-6 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna – Ergi KirkinKirkin (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel – Edoardo LavagnoLavagno (7-5 4-4 ret.) – See score progression
- Sumit NagalNagal – Jacopo BerrettiniBerrettini (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Gian Marco MoroniMarco Moroni (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Salvatore CarusoCaruso – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jelle SelsSels – Jesper De JongDe Jong (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Gianluca MagerMager (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gauthier OnclinOnclin – Francesco FortiForti (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel – Sumit NagalNagal (0-0) – H2H and prediction
